Assessment of fish assemblages and minimum sampling effort required to determine botic integrity of large rivers in southern Idaho, 2002

T. R. Maret, D. S. Ott
{"title":"Assessment of fish assemblages and minimum sampling effort required to determine botic integrity of large rivers in southern Idaho, 2002","authors":"T. R. Maret, D. S. Ott","doi":"10.3133/WRI034274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A critical issue surrounding biomonitoring in large rivers (fifth- through seventh-order) is the minimum sampling-reach distance required to collect an adequate number of fish to represent the fish assemblage within a reach. Excessive sampling effort (excessive reach length) is costly in terms of work hours, reduces the number of sites that can be visited, can compromise field-crew safety, can be logistically unfeasible, and can cause unnecessary injury to captured fish. On the other hand, inadequate sampling effort can produce consider-able variability in multiple samples collected at a site and may underrepresent the species or river condition present. During the summer of 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, determined the minimum sampling effort required to characterize fish assemblages at 17 large-river sites in southern Idaho. The study was done as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. Electrofishing methods and multiple gear types were used to collect sample populations of fish in river reach lengths representing 40 and 100 times the wetted channel width. Minimum sampling effort was assessed by comparing the relation between reach length and the number of species collected, total individuals collected, and final Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores. developed specifically for large Idaho rivers, received scores of less than 50, indicating poor biotic integrity.","PeriodicalId":23603,"journal":{"name":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","volume":"811 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water-Resources Investigations Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3133/WRI034274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Abstract. A critical issue surrounding biomonitoring in large rivers (fifth- through seventh-order) is the minimum sampling-reach distance required to collect an adequate number of fish to represent the fish assemblage within a reach. Excessive sampling effort (excessive reach length) is costly in terms of work hours, reduces the number of sites that can be visited, can compromise field-crew safety, can be logistically unfeasible, and can cause unnecessary injury to captured fish. On the other hand, inadequate sampling effort can produce consider-able variability in multiple samples collected at a site and may underrepresent the species or river condition present. During the summer of 2002, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, determined the minimum sampling effort required to characterize fish assemblages at 17 large-river sites in southern Idaho. The study was done as part of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program. Electrofishing methods and multiple gear types were used to collect sample populations of fish in river reach lengths representing 40 and 100 times the wetted channel width. Minimum sampling effort was assessed by comparing the relation between reach length and the number of species collected, total individuals collected, and final Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI) scores. developed specifically for large Idaho rivers, received scores of less than 50, indicating poor biotic integrity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2002年爱达荷州南部大型河流的鱼群和最小采样努力评估
摘要在大河(五至七阶)中进行生物监测的一个关键问题是收集足够数量的鱼以代表一段河段内的鱼群所需的最小采样距离。过多的采样工作(采样范围过长)会增加工作时间的成本,减少可访问的地点数量,危及现场工作人员的安全,可能在后勤上不可行,并可能对捕获的鱼类造成不必要的伤害。另一方面,不充分的采样工作可能会在一个地点收集的多个样本中产生相当大的差异,并且可能无法充分代表目前的物种或河流状况。2002年夏天,美国地质调查局与爱达荷州环境质量部合作,确定了爱达荷州南部17条大河的鱼类群落特征所需的最小采样量。这项研究是美国环境保护署环境监测和评估项目的一部分。采用电钓法和多种渔具在河道长度为湿河道宽度的40倍和100倍的河段中采集鱼类样本种群。通过比较河段长度与采集的物种数量、采集的总个体数和最终的生物完整性指数(IBI)得分之间的关系来评估最小采样努力。专门为爱达荷州的大河开发的,得分低于50分,表明生物完整性差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Diffusion Hydrodynamic Model Clear-water abutment and contraction scour in the Coastal Plain and Piedmont Provinces of South Carolina, 1996-99 Borehole-geophysical and hydraulic investigation of the fractured-rock aquifer near the University of Connecticut Landfill, Storrs, Connecticut, 2000 to 2001 Trends in Streamflow, River Ice, and Snowpack for Coastal River Basins in Maine During the 20th Century Pesticides in the Lower Clackamas River Basin, Oregon, 2000-01
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1