6ER-033 Pharmacist led deprescribing and follow-up in a subacute multidisciplinary outpatient clinic: a pilot randomised controlled trial

A. Aharaz, J. H. Rasmussen, H. Mcnulty, A. Cyron, A. Bengaard, RR Løvig Simonsen, Charlotte Treldal, M. B. Houlind
{"title":"6ER-033 Pharmacist led deprescribing and follow-up in a subacute multidisciplinary outpatient clinic: a pilot randomised controlled trial","authors":"A. Aharaz, J. H. Rasmussen, H. Mcnulty, A. Cyron, A. Bengaard, RR Løvig Simonsen, Charlotte Treldal, M. B. Houlind","doi":"10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importance Medication deprescribing is essential to prevent inappropriate medication prescribing. However, the experiences of deprescribing in Danish outpatient clinics are limited. Aim and objectives Our objective was to determine the feasibility of a pharmacist led deprescribing intervention in subacute multimorbid patients in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. Material and methods Participants were randomised 1:1 to the intervention or standard care. A senior pharmacist performed a systematic deprescribing intervention, including a patient interview with follow-up 7 and 30 days after inclusion. A senior physician received the proposed recommendations and decided which should be implemented. The main outcome was the number of patients having ≥1 sustained medication deprescribed between inclusion and the 30 day follow-up. Results Of 76 eligible patients, 72 (95%) were included and 67 (93%) completed the study (57% men; mean age 73 years and mean number of prescribed medications 10). In total, 37 medications were deprescribed in the intervention group and 5 in the control group. 19 patients (56%) in the intervention group and 4 (12%) in the control group had ≥1 sustained medications deprescribed 30 days after the intervention (p=0.015). The three most frequent deprescribed medication groups were analgesics, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal medications. Conclusion and relevance In conclusion, a pharmacist led deprescribing intervention to subacute multimorbid patients is feasible to perform in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":11998,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/EJHPHARM-2021-EAHPCONF.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and importance Medication deprescribing is essential to prevent inappropriate medication prescribing. However, the experiences of deprescribing in Danish outpatient clinics are limited. Aim and objectives Our objective was to determine the feasibility of a pharmacist led deprescribing intervention in subacute multimorbid patients in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. Material and methods Participants were randomised 1:1 to the intervention or standard care. A senior pharmacist performed a systematic deprescribing intervention, including a patient interview with follow-up 7 and 30 days after inclusion. A senior physician received the proposed recommendations and decided which should be implemented. The main outcome was the number of patients having ≥1 sustained medication deprescribed between inclusion and the 30 day follow-up. Results Of 76 eligible patients, 72 (95%) were included and 67 (93%) completed the study (57% men; mean age 73 years and mean number of prescribed medications 10). In total, 37 medications were deprescribed in the intervention group and 5 in the control group. 19 patients (56%) in the intervention group and 4 (12%) in the control group had ≥1 sustained medications deprescribed 30 days after the intervention (p=0.015). The three most frequent deprescribed medication groups were analgesics, and cardiovascular and gastrointestinal medications. Conclusion and relevance In conclusion, a pharmacist led deprescribing intervention to subacute multimorbid patients is feasible to perform in a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic. References and/or acknowledgements Conflict of interest No conflict of interest
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
6ER-033药剂师主导的亚急性多学科门诊开处方和随访:一项试点随机对照试验
背景和重要性药物处方化是防止不当用药的必要措施。然而,在丹麦门诊诊所的经验是有限的。目的和目的我们的目的是确定在多学科门诊亚急性多病患者中由药剂师主导的处方干预的可行性。材料和方法参与者按1:1随机分为干预组或标准治疗组。一名高级药剂师进行了系统的处方干预,包括在纳入后7天和30天对患者进行随访。一位资深医生收到了建议,并决定实施哪些建议。主要结局是纳入研究至30天随访期间持续服用≥1种药物的患者数量。76例符合条件的患者中,72例(95%)被纳入研究,67例(93%)完成了研究(57%为男性;平均年龄73岁,平均处方药物数10)。干预组共开了37种药物,对照组开了5种药物。干预组19例(56%),对照组4例(12%)在干预后30天持续服药1次以上(p=0.015)。三个最常见的处方药物组是镇痛药、心血管和胃肠道药物。结论及相关性综上所述,药师主导的亚急性多病患者处方干预在多学科门诊是可行的。参考文献和/或致谢利益冲突无利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacoeconomic and clinical impact of pharmaceutical service in the intensive care unit: a systematic review Assessment of particle contamination in vancomycin syringe pumps following fluid withdrawal using three diverse aseptic reconstitution techniques Comparative analysis of the prevalence 3-HIT concept in people living with HIV and seronegative patients with chronic conditions. Cross-3HIT Project. Adverse drug effect in the context of drug shortage: the CIRUPT prospective study from the French pharmacovigilance network Investigation of the hospital pharmacy profession in Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1