Does the indicator of relative need (IoRN2) tool improve inter-professional conversations?

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2021-09-08 DOI:10.1108/jica-08-2021-0044
W. Barron, Elaine Gifford, P. Knight, Helen Rainey
{"title":"Does the indicator of relative need (IoRN2) tool improve inter-professional conversations?","authors":"W. Barron, Elaine Gifford, P. Knight, Helen Rainey","doi":"10.1108/jica-08-2021-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper provides an overview of an improvement project that explored whether the implementation of IoRN2, a validated freely available tool designed for any health or social care professional to use, resulted in improved conversations across professions within an integrated rehabilitative reablement service.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative descriptive evaluative approach was applied underpinned by quality improvement Lean and Total Quality Management (TQM) to capture perceptions, variables and IoRN2 value-add. Professionals' (N = 8) across Nursing, Allied Health Professions, Social Work, Quality Improvement and Support Workers participated in one-to-one semi-structured <1 h interviews. Recurring themes and experiences were identified.FindingsIoRN2 improved collaborative conversations. The evaluation of the tool demonstrated greatest impact when all professionals were IoRN2 trained. Participants, regardless of profession, believed that their conversations, professional relationships and outcomes improved when using IoRN2. When differing judgments arose with colleagues who were not IoRN2 trained, fear and tension emerged around trust, cultural manners and power play causing disconnects. Incorporating IoRN2 led to psychologically safe environments where trust, confidence and motivation to explore new creative conversations enhanced strength-based outcomes and helped to generate transformational change.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size offered transferable learning worthy of larger future study. The project lead was also the reablement service manager, which may have generated unintended influence.Originality/valueIoRN2 has the potential to improve how HSC professionals converse, acting as a catalytic tool for system-level integration, transformation and sustainable improvement.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-08-2021-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper provides an overview of an improvement project that explored whether the implementation of IoRN2, a validated freely available tool designed for any health or social care professional to use, resulted in improved conversations across professions within an integrated rehabilitative reablement service.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative descriptive evaluative approach was applied underpinned by quality improvement Lean and Total Quality Management (TQM) to capture perceptions, variables and IoRN2 value-add. Professionals' (N = 8) across Nursing, Allied Health Professions, Social Work, Quality Improvement and Support Workers participated in one-to-one semi-structured <1 h interviews. Recurring themes and experiences were identified.FindingsIoRN2 improved collaborative conversations. The evaluation of the tool demonstrated greatest impact when all professionals were IoRN2 trained. Participants, regardless of profession, believed that their conversations, professional relationships and outcomes improved when using IoRN2. When differing judgments arose with colleagues who were not IoRN2 trained, fear and tension emerged around trust, cultural manners and power play causing disconnects. Incorporating IoRN2 led to psychologically safe environments where trust, confidence and motivation to explore new creative conversations enhanced strength-based outcomes and helped to generate transformational change.Research limitations/implicationsThe small sample size offered transferable learning worthy of larger future study. The project lead was also the reablement service manager, which may have generated unintended influence.Originality/valueIoRN2 has the potential to improve how HSC professionals converse, acting as a catalytic tool for system-level integration, transformation and sustainable improvement.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对需求指标(IoRN2)工具是否改善了专业间的对话?
本文概述了一个改进项目,该项目探讨了IoRN2(一种经过验证的免费工具,专为任何健康或社会护理专业人员设计使用)的实施是否会改善综合康复服务中各专业之间的对话。设计/方法/方法在质量改进精益和全面质量管理(TQM)的基础上,采用定性描述性评估方法来捕捉感知、变量和IoRN2增值。护理、联合医疗专业、社会工作、质量改进和支持工作者的专业人员(N = 8)参加了一对一的半结构化访谈。确定了反复出现的主题和经验。发现siorn2改进了协作对话。当所有专业人员都接受过IoRN2培训时,对该工具的评估显示出最大的影响。无论从事何种职业,参与者都认为,使用IoRN2后,他们的对话、职业关系和结果都有所改善。当与没有接受过IoRN2训练的同事产生不同的判断时,围绕信任、文化礼仪和权力游戏的恐惧和紧张情绪就会出现,从而导致关系破裂。结合IoRN2会带来心理安全的环境,在这种环境中,信任、信心和探索新的创造性对话的动机会增强基于力量的结果,并有助于产生转型变革。研究局限性/启示小样本量提供了可转移的学习,值得未来更大规模的研究。项目负责人也是实现服务经理,这可能会产生意想不到的影响。原创性/价值eiorn2有潜力改善HSC专业人员的交流方式,作为系统级集成、转型和可持续改进的催化工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Are community health agents the link to integrating care? Lesson from Brazil Full Engagement with the NHS in an integrated age: reflections on past endeavours (the Wanless Report) and current challenges (the anti-vaxxer movement) Tackling health inequalities through integrated care in English police custodies: an inclusion perspective and model of care Integrated child mental health care provision in Pakistan: End-user and provider perspectives Health care model for people living in nursing homes based on integrated care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1