An Analytical Model of NPS and DQE Comparing Photon Counting and Energy Integrating Detectors.

IF 1.6 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS Plasma Science & Technology Pub Date : 2010-02-01 Epub Date: 2010-03-22 DOI:10.1117/12.845310
Raymond J Acciavatti, Andrew D A Maidment
{"title":"An Analytical Model of NPS and DQE Comparing Photon Counting and Energy Integrating Detectors.","authors":"Raymond J Acciavatti, Andrew D A Maidment","doi":"10.1117/12.845310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this work, analytical models of the optical transfer function (OTF), noise power spectra (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) are developed for two types of digital x-ray detectors. The two detector types are (1) energy integrating (EI), for which the point spread function (PSF) is interpreted as a weighting function for counting x-rays, and (2) photon counting (PC), for which the PSF is treated as a probability. The OTF is the Fourier transform of the PSF. The two detector types, having the same PSF, possess an equivalent OTF. NPS is the discrete space Fourier transform (DSFT) of the autocovariance of signal intensity. From first principles, it is shown that while covariance is equivalent for both detector types, variance is not. As a consequence, provided the two detector types have equivalent PSFs, a difference in NPS exists such that NPS<sub>PC</sub> ≥ NPS<sub>EI</sub> and hence DQE<sub>PC</sub> ≤ DQE<sub>EI</sub>. The necessary and sufficient condition for equality is that the PSF is either zero or unity everywhere. A PSF modeled as the convolution of a Lorentzian with a rect function is analyzed in order to illustrate the differences in NPS and DQE. The Lorentzian models the blurring of the x-ray converter, while the rect function reflects the sampling of the detector. The NPS difference between the two detector types is shown to increase with increasing PSF width. In conclusion, this work develops analytical models of OTF, NPS, and DQE for energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.</p>","PeriodicalId":20250,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Science & Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2010-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290553/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.845310","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2010/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this work, analytical models of the optical transfer function (OTF), noise power spectra (NPS), and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) are developed for two types of digital x-ray detectors. The two detector types are (1) energy integrating (EI), for which the point spread function (PSF) is interpreted as a weighting function for counting x-rays, and (2) photon counting (PC), for which the PSF is treated as a probability. The OTF is the Fourier transform of the PSF. The two detector types, having the same PSF, possess an equivalent OTF. NPS is the discrete space Fourier transform (DSFT) of the autocovariance of signal intensity. From first principles, it is shown that while covariance is equivalent for both detector types, variance is not. As a consequence, provided the two detector types have equivalent PSFs, a difference in NPS exists such that NPSPC ≥ NPSEI and hence DQEPC ≤ DQEEI. The necessary and sufficient condition for equality is that the PSF is either zero or unity everywhere. A PSF modeled as the convolution of a Lorentzian with a rect function is analyzed in order to illustrate the differences in NPS and DQE. The Lorentzian models the blurring of the x-ray converter, while the rect function reflects the sampling of the detector. The NPS difference between the two detector types is shown to increase with increasing PSF width. In conclusion, this work develops analytical models of OTF, NPS, and DQE for energy integrating and photon counting digital x-ray detectors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较光子计数探测器和能量积分探测器的 NPS 和 DQE 分析模型。
在这项工作中,为两种类型的数字 X 射线探测器建立了光传递函数 (OTF)、噪声功率谱 (NPS) 和探测量子效率 (DQE) 的分析模型。这两种探测器分别是:(1) 能量积分探测器(EI),其点扩散函数(PSF)被解释为对 X 射线进行计数的加权函数;(2) 光子计数探测器(PC),其点扩散函数(PSF)被视为一种概率。OTF 是 PSF 的傅里叶变换。具有相同 PSF 的两种探测器具有等效的 OTF。NPS 是信号强度自变量的离散空间傅里叶变换(DSFT)。根据第一原理,两种探测器的协方差是等效的,而方差则不等效。因此,只要两种探测器具有等效的 PSF,就会存在 NPS 差异,即 NPSPC ≥ NPSEI,从而 DQEPC ≤ DQEEI。相等的必要条件和充分条件是 PSF 要么为零,要么处处为一。为了说明 NPS 和 DQE 的差异,我们分析了以洛伦兹函数与矩形函数的卷积为模型的 PSF。洛伦兹曲线模拟了 X 射线转换器的模糊性,而矩形函数则反映了探测器的采样情况。结果表明,随着 PSF 宽度的增加,两种探测器类型之间的 NPS 差异也在增加。总之,这项研究为能量积分和光子计数数字 X 射线探测器建立了 OTF、NPS 和 DQE 的分析模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plasma Science & Technology
Plasma Science & Technology 物理-物理:流体与等离子体
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
3773
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: PST assists in advancing plasma science and technology by reporting important, novel, helpful and thought-provoking progress in this strongly multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary field, in a timely manner. A Publication of the Institute of Plasma Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences and the Chinese Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics.
期刊最新文献
Influence of the position relationship between cathode and magnetic separatrix on the discharge process of Hall thruster Non-thermal atmospheric pressure positive pulsating corona discharge in degradation of textile dye Reactive Blue 19 enhanced by Bi2O3 catalyst Gyro-Landau-fluid simulations of impurity effects on ion temperature gradient driven turbulence transport Ion heat transport in electron cyclotron resonance heated L-mode plasma on the T-10 tokamak Multi-layer phenomena in petawatt laser-driven acceleration of heavy ions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1