Prediction of Gas Viscosity of Yemeni Gas Fields Using Machine Learning Techniques

Salman Sadeg Deumah, Wahib Ali Yahya, A. M. Al-Khudafi, K. Ba-Jaalah, Waleed Tawfeeq Al-Absi
{"title":"Prediction of Gas Viscosity of Yemeni Gas Fields Using Machine Learning Techniques","authors":"Salman Sadeg Deumah, Wahib Ali Yahya, A. M. Al-Khudafi, K. Ba-Jaalah, Waleed Tawfeeq Al-Absi","doi":"10.2118/208667-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Gas viscosity is an important physical property that controls and influences the flow of gas through porous media and pipe networks. An accurate gas viscosity model is essential for use with reservoir and process simulators. The objective of this study is to assess the predictability of gas viscosity of Yemeni gas fields using machine learning techniques.\n Performance of some machine learning techniques in the prediction of gas viscosity investigated in this work. The techniques include K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Decision Tree (DT). About 440 data points were collected from different Yemeni gas fields were used to develop the machine-learning model. The input data used in the training include pressure, temperature, gas density, specific gravity, gas formation volume factor, gas deviation factor, gas molecular weight, pseudo-reduced temperature and pressure, pseudo-critical temperature and pressure, and non-hydrocarbon gas components (N2, CO2, and H2S). Part of the data (75%) was used to train the developed models using the algorithms while another part of the data (25%) was used to predict the viscosity of gas for samples. Trained machine learning models were constructed using the Python programming language. The performance and accuracy of the machine learning models were tested and compared their results based on four different functional input datasets. The result of this study found that that the DT model predicted the gas viscosity with higher accuracy, and gave very good results better than other models based on input parameters of the dataset (A) and (B). This was evidenced by lower the Root mean square error (0.000832), lower mean absolute percent relative error (0.042%), and higher coefficient of determination (R2=0.9465).\n The proposed approach in the present study provides an accurate and inexpensive model for estimating the viscosity of gases as a function of all input parameters of the dataset (A). Overall, the relative effects of these different input parameters have verified that the gas viscosity has the uppermost relevant to the gas density and specific gravity that have the highest percentage of 51%.","PeriodicalId":10904,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 19, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/208667-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Gas viscosity is an important physical property that controls and influences the flow of gas through porous media and pipe networks. An accurate gas viscosity model is essential for use with reservoir and process simulators. The objective of this study is to assess the predictability of gas viscosity of Yemeni gas fields using machine learning techniques. Performance of some machine learning techniques in the prediction of gas viscosity investigated in this work. The techniques include K-nearest neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and Decision Tree (DT). About 440 data points were collected from different Yemeni gas fields were used to develop the machine-learning model. The input data used in the training include pressure, temperature, gas density, specific gravity, gas formation volume factor, gas deviation factor, gas molecular weight, pseudo-reduced temperature and pressure, pseudo-critical temperature and pressure, and non-hydrocarbon gas components (N2, CO2, and H2S). Part of the data (75%) was used to train the developed models using the algorithms while another part of the data (25%) was used to predict the viscosity of gas for samples. Trained machine learning models were constructed using the Python programming language. The performance and accuracy of the machine learning models were tested and compared their results based on four different functional input datasets. The result of this study found that that the DT model predicted the gas viscosity with higher accuracy, and gave very good results better than other models based on input parameters of the dataset (A) and (B). This was evidenced by lower the Root mean square error (0.000832), lower mean absolute percent relative error (0.042%), and higher coefficient of determination (R2=0.9465). The proposed approach in the present study provides an accurate and inexpensive model for estimating the viscosity of gases as a function of all input parameters of the dataset (A). Overall, the relative effects of these different input parameters have verified that the gas viscosity has the uppermost relevant to the gas density and specific gravity that have the highest percentage of 51%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习技术预测也门气田的气体粘度
气体粘度是控制和影响气体通过多孔介质和管网流动的重要物理性质。准确的气体粘度模型对于油藏和过程模拟器的使用至关重要。本研究的目的是利用机器学习技术评估也门气田天然气粘度的可预测性。本文研究了一些机器学习技术在气体粘度预测中的性能。这些技术包括k近邻(KNN)、随机森林(RF)、多元线性回归(MLR)和决策树(DT)。从也门不同的气田收集了大约440个数据点,用于开发机器学习模型。训练中使用的输入数据包括压力、温度、气体密度、比重、地层体积因子、气体偏差因子、气体分子量、伪还原温度和压力、伪临界温度和压力、非烃气体组分(N2、CO2和H2S)。部分数据(75%)用于使用算法训练开发的模型,而另一部分数据(25%)用于预测样品的气体粘度。使用Python编程语言构建训练有素的机器学习模型。基于四种不同的功能输入数据集,测试了机器学习模型的性能和准确性,并比较了它们的结果。本研究结果发现,DT模型预测气体粘度的精度更高,并且比基于数据集(A)和(B)输入参数的其他模型给出了非常好的结果。这体现在均方根误差(0.000832)更低,平均绝对百分比相对误差(0.042%)更低,决定系数(R2=0.9465)更高。本研究中提出的方法为估计气体粘度作为数据集所有输入参数的函数提供了一个准确且廉价的模型(a)。总体而言,这些不同输入参数的相对影响已经验证了气体粘度与气体密度和比重的相关性最大,其百分比最高,为51%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Control of malodorous gases emission from wet-end white water with hydrogen peroxide Application of spruce wood flour as a cellulosic-based wood additive for recycled paper applications— A pilot paper machine study Corrosion damage and in-service inspection of retractable sootblower lances in recovery boilers Kraft recovery boiler operation with splash plate and/or beer can nozzles — a case study Application of Machine Learning in Gas-Hydrate Formation and Trendline Prediction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1