Metonymy, Presence, and the Ethics of Imagination in Postmemorial Writing: Andra Manfelde’s Zemnīcas bērni and Katja Petrowskaja’s Maybe Esther

IF 0.1 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM Interdisciplinary Literary Studies Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0124
Artis Ostups
{"title":"Metonymy, Presence, and the Ethics of Imagination in Postmemorial Writing: Andra Manfelde’s Zemnīcas bērni and Katja Petrowskaja’s Maybe Esther","authors":"Artis Ostups","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article engages with two third-generation narratives of totalitarian trauma—Latvian writer Andra Manfelde’s prose work Zemnīcas bērni (The children of the bunker, 2010) and German writer Katja Petrowskaja’s autobiographical novel Maybe Esther (Vielleicht Esther, 2014)—to demonstrate the substantial role of metonymy in postmemorial writing where it serves the function of reactivating the troubling past. The author’s theoretical departure point is the observation that metonymy has been overlooked within the emphasis on the archive as the empirical basis of postmemorial prose. Metonymical connections between the past and the present are implied in Marianne Hirsch’s (2012) concept “points of memory.” However, her concept seems suited more for explaining the affective power of family photographs, while postmemorial texts are full of all kinds of metonymies: not just images, but also names, dates, and objects, able to enforce the presence of the past. In order to account for these metonymical signs encountered by autobiographical narrators in their storyworlds and made present on the level of narrative discourse, the article suggests turning to Eelco Runia’s (2014) philosophical conception of metonymy as a transfer of presence. The final aspect discussed here is the way metonymy enables ethical imagination.","PeriodicalId":40903,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"124 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.25.1.0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article engages with two third-generation narratives of totalitarian trauma—Latvian writer Andra Manfelde’s prose work Zemnīcas bērni (The children of the bunker, 2010) and German writer Katja Petrowskaja’s autobiographical novel Maybe Esther (Vielleicht Esther, 2014)—to demonstrate the substantial role of metonymy in postmemorial writing where it serves the function of reactivating the troubling past. The author’s theoretical departure point is the observation that metonymy has been overlooked within the emphasis on the archive as the empirical basis of postmemorial prose. Metonymical connections between the past and the present are implied in Marianne Hirsch’s (2012) concept “points of memory.” However, her concept seems suited more for explaining the affective power of family photographs, while postmemorial texts are full of all kinds of metonymies: not just images, but also names, dates, and objects, able to enforce the presence of the past. In order to account for these metonymical signs encountered by autobiographical narrators in their storyworlds and made present on the level of narrative discourse, the article suggests turning to Eelco Runia’s (2014) philosophical conception of metonymy as a transfer of presence. The final aspect discussed here is the way metonymy enables ethical imagination.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转喻、在场和后纪念写作中的想象伦理:安德拉·曼菲尔德的《zemn》bērni和卡特娅·彼得罗夫斯卡娅的《也许是以斯帖》
本文通过拉脱维亚作家安德拉·曼菲尔德的散文作品《地堡的孩子们》bērni(2010年)和德国作家卡特娅·彼得罗夫斯卡娅的自传体小说《也许以斯帖》(2014年)这两篇关于极权主义创伤的第三代叙事来展示转喻在追忆后写作中的重要作用,转喻在追忆后写作中具有重新激活令人不安的过去的功能。作者的理论出发点是观察到转喻在强调档案作为追忆后散文的经验基础时被忽视了。Marianne Hirsch(2012)的“记忆点”概念暗示了过去和现在之间的转喻联系。然而,她的概念似乎更适合于解释家庭照片的情感力量,而追忆文本则充满了各种各样的转喻:不仅是图像,还有名字、日期和物体,能够强化过去的存在。为了解释自传体叙述者在他们的故事世界中遇到的这些转喻符号,并在叙事话语层面上呈现,本文建议转向Eelco Runia(2014)的转喻哲学概念,即存在的转移。这里讨论的最后一个方面是转喻使伦理想象成为可能的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
Interdisciplinary Literary Studies LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Interdisciplinary Literary Studies seeks to explore the interconnections between literary study and other disciplines, ideologies, and cultural methods of critique. All national literatures, periods, and genres are welcomed topics.
期刊最新文献
Negotiating Demons of the Mind: Psychological Distress, Social Apathy and Victimhood in Tagore’s The Garden (Malancha) Discourse and Madness in Shadows in the Sun The Weather Is Dirty: Jane Austen’s Use of Nature as a Social Agent Women’s Dilemma of Love: An Ethical Literary Interpretation of Miss Sophie’s Diary by Ding Ling Improvisation in Jack Kerouac’s “Jazz” Writing: Intersubjectivity, Authenticity, and the Collectivist Utopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1