Predictors of public support for police accreditation

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Pub Date : 2022-07-18 DOI:10.1108/pijpsm-02-2022-0035
Gordon Abner
{"title":"Predictors of public support for police accreditation","authors":"Gordon Abner","doi":"10.1108/pijpsm-02-2022-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to identify the predictors of public support for police accreditation under four different scenarios that vary based upon whether or not accreditation requires a property tax increase and whether or not local police support accreditation.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws upon survey data from 998 US adults. Four binary logistic models are employed to assess support for accreditation under four different scenarios.FindingsIndividual-level factors, including age, education, race, region, generalized trust, political ideology, and volunteer experience, are important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Community-level factors including perceptions of police performance and perceptions of property taxes are also important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Support for police accreditation is highest when police accreditation does not require a property tax increase and when local police support accreditation. Sixty-six percent of respondents support police accreditation under this scenario.Originality/valueThis article represents the first published study on the predictors of support for police accreditation. The findings from this study have important implications for implementing police reform given recent calls by activists to both reform the police and to defund them.","PeriodicalId":47881,"journal":{"name":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policing-An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pijpsm-02-2022-0035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to identify the predictors of public support for police accreditation under four different scenarios that vary based upon whether or not accreditation requires a property tax increase and whether or not local police support accreditation.Design/methodology/approachThis study draws upon survey data from 998 US adults. Four binary logistic models are employed to assess support for accreditation under four different scenarios.FindingsIndividual-level factors, including age, education, race, region, generalized trust, political ideology, and volunteer experience, are important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Community-level factors including perceptions of police performance and perceptions of property taxes are also important predictors of support for police accreditation depending on the scenario presented. Support for police accreditation is highest when police accreditation does not require a property tax increase and when local police support accreditation. Sixty-six percent of respondents support police accreditation under this scenario.Originality/valueThis article represents the first published study on the predictors of support for police accreditation. The findings from this study have important implications for implementing police reform given recent calls by activists to both reform the police and to defund them.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公众对警察认证支持的预测因素
本研究旨在确定四种不同情景下公众支持警察认证的预测因素,这些预测因素取决于认证是否需要增加财产税以及当地警察是否支持认证。设计/方法/方法本研究采用了998名美国成年人的调查数据。采用四种二元逻辑模型来评估四种不同情景下的认证支持度。个人层面的因素,包括年龄、教育、种族、地区、普遍信任、政治意识形态和志愿者经验,是支持警察认证的重要预测因素,具体取决于所提出的方案。社区层面的因素,包括对警察绩效的看法和对财产税的看法,也是支持警察认证的重要预测因素,具体取决于所提出的方案。当警察认证不需要增加财产税和当地警察支持认证时,对警察认证的支持是最高的。66%的受访者支持在这种情况下对警察进行认证。原创性/价值这篇文章是首次发表的关于警察认证支持预测因素的研究。这项研究的结果对实施警察改革具有重要意义,因为活动人士最近呼吁改革警察并解除他们的资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: ■Community policing ■Managerial styles and leadership ■Performance measurement and accountability ■Pursuit guidelines ■Crime trends and analysis ■Crisis negotiation ■Civil disorder ■Organized crime ■Victimology ■Crime prevention ■Career development ■High risk police activities ■Routine policing ■Traffic enforcement ■Civil litigation.
期刊最新文献
How can we help law enforcement agencies learn? A look at CALEA police accreditation Crime on the mass transit system in Hong Kong: a hotspots and harmspots trajectory approach Does Weisburd's law of crime concentration apply to traffic crashes? Implications for policing and traffic law enforcement How the police conceptualise and view the relevance of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) for policing: a qualitative investigation Compliments or complaints: an evaluation of a community oriented policing practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1