Accepting Dominion Status as a Way of Reconciliation of British-Irish Disputes?

IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY Britain and the World Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.3366/BRW.2021.0359
J. Valkoun
{"title":"Accepting Dominion Status as a Way of Reconciliation of British-Irish Disputes?","authors":"J. Valkoun","doi":"10.3366/BRW.2021.0359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is focused on an analysis of British-Irish relations in 1921. From the British point of view, the best solution to the conflict seemed to be the granting of Dominion status. It was based on the assumption that the British Empire represented the largest community of free sister nations in the world. On the contrary, Irish officials did not have the confidence to participate in various colonial or imperial projects because they considered themselves a victim of British colonialism. The question of the accepting of the Dominion status divided the Irish political scene into supporters and opponents of the Anglo-Irish treaty. Supporters of the agreement calmed their own sympathizers by claiming that freedom and equality derive directly from Dominion status. However, the lack of precise determination of the rights and duties of the Dominions was a complication of the situation. The question arises as to whether negotiations on reconciliation between Britain and Ireland led from the British and Irish perspectives, in the context of the then unclear situation of what precisely it means to be a Dominion, to a fair solution to the British-Irish Disputes.","PeriodicalId":53867,"journal":{"name":"Britain and the World","volume":"86 3 1","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Britain and the World","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/BRW.2021.0359","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is focused on an analysis of British-Irish relations in 1921. From the British point of view, the best solution to the conflict seemed to be the granting of Dominion status. It was based on the assumption that the British Empire represented the largest community of free sister nations in the world. On the contrary, Irish officials did not have the confidence to participate in various colonial or imperial projects because they considered themselves a victim of British colonialism. The question of the accepting of the Dominion status divided the Irish political scene into supporters and opponents of the Anglo-Irish treaty. Supporters of the agreement calmed their own sympathizers by claiming that freedom and equality derive directly from Dominion status. However, the lack of precise determination of the rights and duties of the Dominions was a complication of the situation. The question arises as to whether negotiations on reconciliation between Britain and Ireland led from the British and Irish perspectives, in the context of the then unclear situation of what precisely it means to be a Dominion, to a fair solution to the British-Irish Disputes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受自治领地位是英爱争端的和解之道?
这篇文章着重分析了1921年英国与爱尔兰的关系。从英国的观点来看,解决冲突的最佳办法似乎是给予自治领地位。它是基于这样一种假设:大英帝国代表着世界上最大的自由姐妹国家共同体。相反,爱尔兰官员没有信心参与各种殖民或帝国项目,因为他们认为自己是英国殖民主义的受害者。在接受自治领地位的问题上,爱尔兰政坛分裂为支持和反对《英爱条约》的两派。该协议的支持者通过声称自由和平等直接来自自治领地位来安抚他们的同情者。然而,缺乏对各自治领的权利和义务的精确确定使情况更加复杂。问题是,在当时不清楚“自治领”究竟意味着什么的情况下,英国和爱尔兰之间的和解谈判是否从英国和爱尔兰的角度出发,导致了英爱争端的公平解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
Contesting an Elastic Constitution: British Nationality and Protection in the Mandates Beyond God, Country, and Empire: The United Kingdom and the Transnational Turn in the First World War In Mutual Recognition of the Value of Seapower: Anglo-American Unity and the Destroyers Transferred Under the Destroyers-for-Bases Deal Lusaka: New Capital and the Imperial Garden City Movement Front matter
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1