PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LIQUID BIOPSY IN CRC: A LITERATURE REVIEW

T. Nasrytdinov
{"title":"PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF LIQUID BIOPSY IN CRC: A LITERATURE REVIEW","authors":"T. Nasrytdinov","doi":"10.52532/2521-6414-2023-2-68-76-81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance: Liquid biopsy is a modern, quite appropriate, and promising method for diagnosing malignant neoplasms for oncology. The method allows us to determine the level of freely circulating tumor cells – micrometastases, tumor DNA, microRNA, and exosomes in blood plasma- and detect various genetic changes. A literature review of current scientific publications on liquid biopsy techniques, indexed in Medline, PubMed, and Medscape, was carried out as part of the work. \nThe study aimed to review is to assess the prognostic significance of liquid biopsy, to determine the place of the method in current recommendations, and its expediency from the point of view of the practice. \nMethods: The information search was conducted in the Medline, PubMed, and Medscape databases, with a search depth of 8 years. Data from randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were analyzed. The review includes both full-fledged articles in the public domain and abstracts to obtain complete information on the problem. \nResults: Liquid biopsy surpasses tissue biopsy in simplicity and speed of research, easy repeatability, and minimal invasiveness, as well as the possibility of dynamic monitoring of progression – the overall clonal transformation of the tumor and the emergence of resistance to treatment. \nThe disadvantages of this method are low sensitivity, difficulty in correctly interpreting biomarkers and determining their specificity, and high risk of false positive and false negative results due to dormant tumor cells. \nConclusion: At present, the Liquid biopsy method is relevant and in demand, but it needs to be tested on a validated sample of the main population, and in order to achieve effective clinical use, important work needs to be done to standardize both preanalytical and analytical procedures and generalize them for all components of liquid biopsy.","PeriodicalId":19480,"journal":{"name":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncologia i radiologia Kazakhstana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52532/2521-6414-2023-2-68-76-81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance: Liquid biopsy is a modern, quite appropriate, and promising method for diagnosing malignant neoplasms for oncology. The method allows us to determine the level of freely circulating tumor cells – micrometastases, tumor DNA, microRNA, and exosomes in blood plasma- and detect various genetic changes. A literature review of current scientific publications on liquid biopsy techniques, indexed in Medline, PubMed, and Medscape, was carried out as part of the work. The study aimed to review is to assess the prognostic significance of liquid biopsy, to determine the place of the method in current recommendations, and its expediency from the point of view of the practice. Methods: The information search was conducted in the Medline, PubMed, and Medscape databases, with a search depth of 8 years. Data from randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses were analyzed. The review includes both full-fledged articles in the public domain and abstracts to obtain complete information on the problem. Results: Liquid biopsy surpasses tissue biopsy in simplicity and speed of research, easy repeatability, and minimal invasiveness, as well as the possibility of dynamic monitoring of progression – the overall clonal transformation of the tumor and the emergence of resistance to treatment. The disadvantages of this method are low sensitivity, difficulty in correctly interpreting biomarkers and determining their specificity, and high risk of false positive and false negative results due to dormant tumor cells. Conclusion: At present, the Liquid biopsy method is relevant and in demand, but it needs to be tested on a validated sample of the main population, and in order to achieve effective clinical use, important work needs to be done to standardize both preanalytical and analytical procedures and generalize them for all components of liquid biopsy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液体活检在结直肠癌中的预后价值:文献综述
相关性:液体活检是一种现代的、非常合适的、有前途的肿瘤诊断方法。该方法使我们能够确定自由循环肿瘤细胞的水平-微转移,肿瘤DNA, microRNA和血浆中的外泌体-并检测各种遗传变化。在Medline、PubMed和Medscape中检索了当前关于液体活检技术的科学出版物,并对其进行了文献回顾,作为工作的一部分。本研究旨在评估液体活检的预后意义,确定该方法在当前推荐中的地位,以及从实践的角度来看其便利性。方法:在Medline、PubMed和Medscape数据库中进行信息检索,检索深度为8年。我们分析了随机对照试验、临床试验、综述、系统综述和荟萃分析的数据。该综述包括公共领域的完整文章和摘要,以获得有关该问题的完整信息。结果:液体活检优于组织活检的简单性和研究速度,易于重复性和最小的侵入性,以及动态监测进展的可能性-肿瘤的整体克隆转化和治疗耐药性的出现。该方法的缺点是灵敏度低,难以正确解释生物标志物并确定其特异性,并且由于肿瘤细胞处于休眠状态,存在假阳性和假阴性结果的高风险。结论:目前液体活检方法是相关的,也是有需求的,但需要在主要人群的验证样本上进行测试,为了实现有效的临床应用,需要做重要的工作来规范分析前和分析过程,并推广液体活检的所有组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION OF SKIN CANCER AND MELANOMIA IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN IN 2012-2022 DNA BREAKS AND REPAIR IN LYMPHOCYTES AS A DIAGNOSTIC MARKER IN PATIENTS WITH GASTRIC CANCER MODIFIABLE RISK FACTORS FOR COLORECTAL CANCER DEVELOPMENT: A LITERATURE REVIEW CARCINOGENICITY OF IONIZING RADIATION: A LITERATURE REVIEW THE RESULTS OF THE JAPANESE GASTRIC CANCER SOCIETY MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION ADAPTATION FOR THE KAZAKH POPULATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1