Science funding under an authoritarian regime: Portugal's National Education Board and the European ‘academic landscape’ in the interwar period

Quintino Lopes, E. Pereira
{"title":"Science funding under an authoritarian regime: Portugal's National Education Board and the European ‘academic landscape’ in the interwar period","authors":"Quintino Lopes, E. Pereira","doi":"10.1098/rsnr.2021.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article enables an understanding of scientific practice and funding in a peripheral country ruled by a dictatorship in the interwar period, and thus provides the basis for comparison with studies of other non-democratic regimes. We examine the work of Portugal's Junta de Educação Nacional (National Education Board), which administered and provided funding for science from 1929 to 1936. Our findings show that this public body encouraged the participation of the Portuguese academic community in international science networks. This scenario contrasts with the dominant historiographical thesis that between the wars the Portuguese academic community did not play a role in international networks, and that it lacked state support. Also in contrast with the dominant historiography, whose ideological bias meant that a simplified picture was portrayed, whereas the reality is shown to be complex, this study demonstrates that the Portuguese dictatorial state sought to foster scientific progress through the Junta, but that resentment among academics and the resistance of universities to innovation meant that this objective was only partially achieved. Finally, the memory of a number of scientists has been rescued from oblivion, as we show how their political stance during the dictatorship led to their being ignored by historiographers when democracy prevailed.","PeriodicalId":82881,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania notes and records","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania notes and records","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2021.0037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article enables an understanding of scientific practice and funding in a peripheral country ruled by a dictatorship in the interwar period, and thus provides the basis for comparison with studies of other non-democratic regimes. We examine the work of Portugal's Junta de Educação Nacional (National Education Board), which administered and provided funding for science from 1929 to 1936. Our findings show that this public body encouraged the participation of the Portuguese academic community in international science networks. This scenario contrasts with the dominant historiographical thesis that between the wars the Portuguese academic community did not play a role in international networks, and that it lacked state support. Also in contrast with the dominant historiography, whose ideological bias meant that a simplified picture was portrayed, whereas the reality is shown to be complex, this study demonstrates that the Portuguese dictatorial state sought to foster scientific progress through the Junta, but that resentment among academics and the resistance of universities to innovation meant that this objective was only partially achieved. Finally, the memory of a number of scientists has been rescued from oblivion, as we show how their political stance during the dictatorship led to their being ignored by historiographers when democracy prevailed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
专制政权下的科学资助:两次世界大战期间葡萄牙国家教育委员会和欧洲“学术景观”
本文使人们能够理解在两次世界大战期间,一个由独裁统治的外围国家的科学实践和资助,从而为与其他非民主政权的研究进行比较提供了基础。我们考察了葡萄牙的Junta de educa o Nacional(国家教育委员会)的工作,该委员会从1929年到1936年管理和提供科学资金。我们的研究结果表明,这个公共机构鼓励葡萄牙学术界参与国际科学网络。这种情况与主流的史学论点形成鲜明对比,即在两次世界大战之间,葡萄牙学术界没有在国际网络中发挥作用,而且缺乏国家支持。此外,与主流史学相反,主流史学的意识形态偏见意味着描绘了一个简化的画面,而现实却是复杂的,这项研究表明,葡萄牙的独裁国家试图通过军政府促进科学进步,但学术界的怨恨和大学对创新的抵制意味着这一目标只部分实现了。最后,一些科学家的记忆被从遗忘中拯救出来,因为我们展示了他们在独裁统治期间的政治立场如何导致他们在民主盛行时被历史学家忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ‘seductive scientist’: the emergence of a new persona centred on virility and joy in twentieth-century scientific memoirs The making of a naturalist in Manchuria: Arthur de Carle Sowerby, 1885–1922 Making science for the Portuguese Empire: The Royal Maritime, Military and Geographic Society (1798–1809) Redhead, Paroissien, Parish & Co.: British Field Science in early Independent Río de la Plata Sympathetic Organizations: body, mind, and society in Robert Whytt and David Hume
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1