ROOT DISTRIBUTION OF MATURE OIL PALMS IN MINERAL AND PEAT SOILS AND ITS IMPLICATION ON FERTILISER PLACEMENT

The Planter Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.56333/tp.2022.007
M. Sidhu, Z. Sinuraya, A. Aziz, Era Wahyudi, Y. Samosir, M. Sharma
{"title":"ROOT DISTRIBUTION OF MATURE OIL PALMS IN MINERAL AND PEAT SOILS AND ITS IMPLICATION ON FERTILISER PLACEMENT","authors":"M. Sidhu, Z. Sinuraya, A. Aziz, Era Wahyudi, Y. Samosir, M. Sharma","doi":"10.56333/tp.2022.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The correct placement of fertilisers is critical, as losses can be very significant especially in regions of high and frequent rainfall, non-terraced slopes, sandy textured soils and peat. To maximise uptake efficiency, fertilisers should be evenly broadcast over the soil surface area that contains the highest density of feeder roots. In order to determine the latter, an investigation was undertaken to ascertain the biomass and distribution of roots of various ages of mature oil palms planted in both mineral and second generation peat soils. Results of the study indicate that if site factors are not limiting, palm age and past fertiliser placement history are two major factors influencing oil palm root development and distribution. In mature well decomposed peat, although roots could be found growing 4 m from palm bole, actual root biomass per unit volume of soil was low. Only 21 per cent of the feeder roots of 8-year-old palms were found growing outside the weeded palm circles (WPC). Even within the latter, approximately 50 per cent were concentrated within a radius of 1 m from the palm bole. The low bulk density and high porosity of peat appears to discourage roots from growing beyond this distance. In mineral soils, there was a consistent and gradual increase in root spread beyond the WPC, with palm age. Feeder root distribution beyond a 2 m radius ranged from as low as 26 per cent in 6-year-old palms planted on terraces to 41 per cent for 8-year-old palms established in non-terraced soils. Only palms older than 10 years of age had root biomass greater than 50 per cent beyond this radius. In all sites, there was an increase in primary and secondary root biomass with soil depth and a linear decrease in feeder root biomass down the soil profile. Soil chemical analysis indicated that apart from palm age, the horizontal and vertical distribution of feeder roots was strongly influenced by soil fertility gradients created by past fertiliser placement history. As fertilisers were previously applied entirely in the WPC for younger palms (<8 years), there was a significant decline in soil fertility with increasing distance from the palm bole and increasing soil depth. The majority of feeder roots were concentrated within the 2 m radius from the palm bole and in the top 20 cm of soil, where nutrient levels were the highest. In older palms (>10 years) where fertilisers had been broadcast over frond heaps in the interpalm spaces and interrows, feeder root biomass was higher outside the WPC, as soil fertility gradients were less apparent. Taking into account the root distribution patterns of oil palm in relation to palm age, specific recommendations on fertiliser placement for oil palm grown on mineral and peat soils are made, so as to improve fertiliser uptake and utilisation.","PeriodicalId":22956,"journal":{"name":"The Planter","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56333/tp.2022.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The correct placement of fertilisers is critical, as losses can be very significant especially in regions of high and frequent rainfall, non-terraced slopes, sandy textured soils and peat. To maximise uptake efficiency, fertilisers should be evenly broadcast over the soil surface area that contains the highest density of feeder roots. In order to determine the latter, an investigation was undertaken to ascertain the biomass and distribution of roots of various ages of mature oil palms planted in both mineral and second generation peat soils. Results of the study indicate that if site factors are not limiting, palm age and past fertiliser placement history are two major factors influencing oil palm root development and distribution. In mature well decomposed peat, although roots could be found growing 4 m from palm bole, actual root biomass per unit volume of soil was low. Only 21 per cent of the feeder roots of 8-year-old palms were found growing outside the weeded palm circles (WPC). Even within the latter, approximately 50 per cent were concentrated within a radius of 1 m from the palm bole. The low bulk density and high porosity of peat appears to discourage roots from growing beyond this distance. In mineral soils, there was a consistent and gradual increase in root spread beyond the WPC, with palm age. Feeder root distribution beyond a 2 m radius ranged from as low as 26 per cent in 6-year-old palms planted on terraces to 41 per cent for 8-year-old palms established in non-terraced soils. Only palms older than 10 years of age had root biomass greater than 50 per cent beyond this radius. In all sites, there was an increase in primary and secondary root biomass with soil depth and a linear decrease in feeder root biomass down the soil profile. Soil chemical analysis indicated that apart from palm age, the horizontal and vertical distribution of feeder roots was strongly influenced by soil fertility gradients created by past fertiliser placement history. As fertilisers were previously applied entirely in the WPC for younger palms (<8 years), there was a significant decline in soil fertility with increasing distance from the palm bole and increasing soil depth. The majority of feeder roots were concentrated within the 2 m radius from the palm bole and in the top 20 cm of soil, where nutrient levels were the highest. In older palms (>10 years) where fertilisers had been broadcast over frond heaps in the interpalm spaces and interrows, feeder root biomass was higher outside the WPC, as soil fertility gradients were less apparent. Taking into account the root distribution patterns of oil palm in relation to palm age, specific recommendations on fertiliser placement for oil palm grown on mineral and peat soils are made, so as to improve fertiliser uptake and utilisation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矿质和泥炭土中成熟油棕根系分布及其对施肥的影响
化肥的正确投放是至关重要的,因为损失可能非常巨大,特别是在降雨量高且频繁的地区、非梯田斜坡、沙质土壤和泥炭地。为了最大限度地提高吸收效率,肥料应该均匀地撒播在含有最高密度的养料根的土壤表面。为了确定后者,进行了一项调查,以确定在矿物和第二代泥炭土中种植的不同年龄的成熟油棕的生物量和根系分布。研究结果表明,在不受场地因素限制的情况下,棕榈树龄和过去施肥历史是影响油棕根系发育和分布的两个主要因素。在成熟的分解良好的泥炭中,虽然在距棕榈孔4 m处可以发现根系生长,但单位体积土壤的实际根系生物量较低。只有21%的8岁棕榈树的喂食根被发现生长在杂草棕榈圈(WPC)之外。即使在后者中,大约50%集中在距离棕榈洞1米的半径范围内。泥炭的低容重和高孔隙率似乎阻碍了根系在这个距离之外的生长。在矿质土壤中,随着棕榈年龄的增长,在WPC以外的根展布有一致的逐渐增加。超过2米半径的取食根分布范围从种植在梯田上的6年树龄棕榈树的26%到种植在非梯田土壤上的8年树龄棕榈树的41%不等。只有树龄大于10年的棕榈树在这个半径以外的根生物量大于50%。所有样地的原生和次生根系生物量都随土壤深度的增加而增加,而取食植物根系生物量则沿土壤剖面呈线性减少。土壤化学分析表明,除棕榈年龄外,饲根的水平和垂直分布还受到施肥历史造成的土壤肥力梯度的强烈影响。由于以前的肥料完全施用于年轻的棕榈(10年),在棕榈间隙和行间的叶堆上施用肥料,由于土壤肥力梯度不太明显,在WPC外,饲料根生物量更高。考虑到油棕的根分布模式与棕榈年龄的关系,对矿质和泥炭土上生长的油棕的施肥提出了具体建议,以提高肥料的吸收和利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EXTENSION CASE STUDY: WHY PADDY FARMERS ARE NOT INCLINED TO USE A DRONE AS PART OF MECHANISATION FOR PADDY CULTIVATION COMPARISON OF ABUNDANCE OF RODENTS IN IMMATURE AND MATURE OIL PALM PLANTATIONS IN LAHAD DATU, SABAH Evaluation of Four Yield Stimulants on Hevea brasiliensis Yield IMPACT OF MSPO CERTIFICATION ON PROFIT AMONG PALM OIL GROWERS IN MALAYSIA IS AN OIL PALM PLANTATION STILL A COMPETITIVE BUSINESS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1