Loneliness in healthcare providers: Results from a mid-pandemic survey

D. Kolcz, Jennifer L. Ferrand, K. Young, D. O’Sullivan, K. Robinson
{"title":"Loneliness in healthcare providers: Results from a mid-pandemic survey","authors":"D. Kolcz, Jennifer L. Ferrand, K. Young, D. O’Sullivan, K. Robinson","doi":"10.1177/11795573231198032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Provider loneliness in healthcare can have devastating consequences. The causes of loneliness are not well known and workplace changes during the COVID-19 pandemic likely cause fewer opportunities for socialization. We sought to explore the relationships between healthcare worker loneliness and isolation among various specialties and work environments. We evaluated factors that may contribute to increased loneliness/isolation, such as job satisfaction, time with peers, and work-related changes during COVID-19. An email containing an 18-item survey was sent out to Hartford Hospital’s medical staff. Hartford Hospital Hartford Hospital’s medical staff including physicians, psychologists, physician assistants, and APRNs Our survey included demographic information, questions regarding frequency of meaningful interactions with colleagues, isolation behaviors, as well as the UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2, Single-Item Burnout Scale, and Single-Item Measure of Job Satisfaction Of 1,015 respondents, almost half (48%) reported feeling lonely. Staff in procedure areas had significantly higher loneliness scores, while hospital-based floor/unit staff reported the lowest scores. Isolation was attributed to exhaustion from clinical work (36.1%), being too busy (39.6%), and being cautious due to COVID-19 (39.2%). Those who reported burnout, depression, and having few meaningful interactions all had increased loneliness scores. Those with higher job satisfaction reported lower loneliness. While our study had a 51% response rate, this rate is equivalent or higher than the response rate the organization receives to obligatory engagement surveys. It is likely that the ongoing pandemic affected these results. We found significant levels of loneliness among our medical staff that appeared strongly related to work setting and environment. Social isolation behaviors were associated with higher loneliness scores. Future research should examine the efficacy of tailored strategies/interventions to reduce loneliness. None","PeriodicalId":10437,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights: Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795573231198032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Provider loneliness in healthcare can have devastating consequences. The causes of loneliness are not well known and workplace changes during the COVID-19 pandemic likely cause fewer opportunities for socialization. We sought to explore the relationships between healthcare worker loneliness and isolation among various specialties and work environments. We evaluated factors that may contribute to increased loneliness/isolation, such as job satisfaction, time with peers, and work-related changes during COVID-19. An email containing an 18-item survey was sent out to Hartford Hospital’s medical staff. Hartford Hospital Hartford Hospital’s medical staff including physicians, psychologists, physician assistants, and APRNs Our survey included demographic information, questions regarding frequency of meaningful interactions with colleagues, isolation behaviors, as well as the UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire-2, Single-Item Burnout Scale, and Single-Item Measure of Job Satisfaction Of 1,015 respondents, almost half (48%) reported feeling lonely. Staff in procedure areas had significantly higher loneliness scores, while hospital-based floor/unit staff reported the lowest scores. Isolation was attributed to exhaustion from clinical work (36.1%), being too busy (39.6%), and being cautious due to COVID-19 (39.2%). Those who reported burnout, depression, and having few meaningful interactions all had increased loneliness scores. Those with higher job satisfaction reported lower loneliness. While our study had a 51% response rate, this rate is equivalent or higher than the response rate the organization receives to obligatory engagement surveys. It is likely that the ongoing pandemic affected these results. We found significant levels of loneliness among our medical staff that appeared strongly related to work setting and environment. Social isolation behaviors were associated with higher loneliness scores. Future research should examine the efficacy of tailored strategies/interventions to reduce loneliness. None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健提供者的孤独感:大流行中期调查的结果
医疗服务提供者的孤独感可能会带来毁灭性的后果。造成孤独感的原因尚不清楚,在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,工作场所的变化可能会减少社交机会。我们试图探索医护人员在不同专业和工作环境中的孤独感和孤立感之间的关系。我们评估了可能导致孤独感/孤立感增加的因素,如工作满意度、与同事相处的时间以及COVID-19期间与工作相关的变化。一封包含18项调查的电子邮件被发送给了哈特福德医院的医务人员。我们的调查包括人口统计信息,与同事有意义的互动频率的问题,孤立行为,以及加州大学洛杉矶分校3项孤独量表,患者健康问卷-2,单项倦怠量表和单项工作满意度测量。1015名受访者中,近一半(48%)表示感到孤独。程序区工作人员的孤独感得分明显较高,而医院的楼层/单位工作人员报告的孤独感得分最低。被隔离的原因包括临床工作劳累(36.1%)、太忙(39.6%)和新冠肺炎(39.2%)。那些报告倦怠、抑郁和很少有意义的互动的人都有更高的孤独得分。那些工作满意度较高的人报告的孤独感较低。虽然我们的研究有51%的回复率,但这一比率相当于或高于组织收到的强制性参与调查的回复率。目前的大流行很可能影响了这些结果。我们发现,医务人员的孤独感程度很高,这似乎与工作环境密切相关。社会孤立行为与更高的孤独感得分有关。未来的研究应该检查量身定制的策略/干预措施的有效性,以减少孤独感。没有一个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digeorge syndrome, schizophrenia, intellectual disability and borderline personality disorder: A case report Loneliness in healthcare providers: Results from a mid-pandemic survey The Lifetime Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Co-Morbidities of Specific Phobia Among Pediatric Population: A Cross-Sectional National Survey Modifying Group Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Peripartum Adolescents in Sub-Saharan African Context: Reviewing Differential Contextual and Implementation Considerations How Do Case Mangers Determine the Types of Services Provided to Users in the Intensive Case Management? A Longitudinal Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1