Visions: "Which made it look like a gentleman’s”: Anne Lister’s Use of Lord Byron in Her Construction of a Gentlemanly Image

M. Olivieri
{"title":"Visions: \"Which made it look like a gentleman’s”: Anne Lister’s Use of Lord Byron in Her Construction of a Gentlemanly Image","authors":"M. Olivieri","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.11.2.1282.","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the rigorous study of Anne Lister’s personal and public identities, scholars have only minimally acknowledged the ways in which Lister appropriated the ideas and practices of others to construct the image of herself they themselves are so fascinated by. From her teenage years onward, Lister collected ideas, images, and published works that broke with the traditional, conservative ideals on which she was raised and adapted them for her own use in expanding her queer identity. Of the scholars who do investigate Lister’s use of the publicly queer, even fewer have thoroughly examined Lister’s method of adaptation as a distinctly queer process of recognition and replication within the community—a process that, to some extent, still exists today. This paper aims to bridge a portion of this gap by examining Lister’s use of Lord Byron and argues that in her reflecting the easily visible traits of other, more public figures like Byron, Anne Lister exemplifies a tradition of queer survival methods that have created a community built on recognition and visibility within while maintaining the ability to hide in plain sight without, existing in the space between seen and unseen.","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.11.2.1282.","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the rigorous study of Anne Lister’s personal and public identities, scholars have only minimally acknowledged the ways in which Lister appropriated the ideas and practices of others to construct the image of herself they themselves are so fascinated by. From her teenage years onward, Lister collected ideas, images, and published works that broke with the traditional, conservative ideals on which she was raised and adapted them for her own use in expanding her queer identity. Of the scholars who do investigate Lister’s use of the publicly queer, even fewer have thoroughly examined Lister’s method of adaptation as a distinctly queer process of recognition and replication within the community—a process that, to some extent, still exists today. This paper aims to bridge a portion of this gap by examining Lister’s use of Lord Byron and argues that in her reflecting the easily visible traits of other, more public figures like Byron, Anne Lister exemplifies a tradition of queer survival methods that have created a community built on recognition and visibility within while maintaining the ability to hide in plain sight without, existing in the space between seen and unseen.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这使它看起来像一个绅士的”:安妮·李斯特在她的绅士形象的构建中使用拜伦勋爵
尽管学者们对安妮·李斯特的个人身份和公共身份进行了严格的研究,但他们只是最低限度地承认了李斯特利用他人的思想和实践来构建自己形象的方式,而他们自己也如此着迷。从少女时代起,李斯特就开始收集想法、图片,并出版作品,这些想法和作品打破了她成长的传统、保守的理想,并将其改编为自己的用途,以扩大她的酷儿身份。在研究李斯特对公开酷儿的使用的学者中,更少的人将李斯特的适应方法作为一个在社区内识别和复制的明显酷儿过程进行了彻底的研究——在某种程度上,这个过程今天仍然存在。本文旨在通过研究李斯特对拜伦勋爵的使用来弥补这一差距,并认为在她反映其他容易看到的特征时,像拜伦这样的公众人物,安妮·李斯特体现了酷儿生存方法的传统,这种方法创造了一个建立在认可和可见性之上的社区,同时保持了隐藏在可见和不可见之间空间的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1