Dragisa Stojadinovic’s Open letter regarding Miroslav Krleza’s “Serbian themes”

Vukašin Marić
{"title":"Dragisa Stojadinovic’s Open letter regarding Miroslav Krleza’s “Serbian themes”","authors":"Vukašin Marić","doi":"10.2298/zmsdn2281075m","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the reaction of Dragisa Stojadinovic to the feuilleton ?Serbian themes? done by the writer Miroslav Krleza. Krleza?s feuilleton was being published in newspaper Politika during April, May and June of 1963. It consisted of fragments from his earlier writings organized in thematic units and concerning different topics from Serbian history. Dragisa Stojadinovic, former soldier, chief of Cinematographic section of Serbian army on Salonica front during the First World War and politician in interwar Yugoslavia, responded to Krleza?s feuilleton by writting an Open letter to the Yugoslav Academy of Sciences and Arts (Zagreb), the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (Belgrade) and the Matica Srpska (Novi Sad). Stojadinovic?s Open letter was sent on June 28th, 1963. It focused on scrutinizing Krleza?s article Pasic about the Salonika trial published in Politika on June 9th. Both informations stated by Krleza and criticism put forward by Stojadinovic are analyzed in the light of contemporary historiographical knowledge. Different interpretations presented by Krleza and Stojadinovic have their roots in opposed views on causes and results of Salonika trial. Stojadinovic defended the legitimacy of trial started by his father-in-law Ljuba Jovanovic Patak, he was involved in its organisation and later accused of witness tampering. Krleza saw trial in the light of ?counter-revolutionary? Yugoslav unification in 1918 and as an act of ?political and judicial murder?. Article also contains original documents from National Library of Serbia.","PeriodicalId":40081,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","volume":"206 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik Matice Srpske za Likovne Umetnosti-Matica Srpska Journal for Fine Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2281075m","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the reaction of Dragisa Stojadinovic to the feuilleton ?Serbian themes? done by the writer Miroslav Krleza. Krleza?s feuilleton was being published in newspaper Politika during April, May and June of 1963. It consisted of fragments from his earlier writings organized in thematic units and concerning different topics from Serbian history. Dragisa Stojadinovic, former soldier, chief of Cinematographic section of Serbian army on Salonica front during the First World War and politician in interwar Yugoslavia, responded to Krleza?s feuilleton by writting an Open letter to the Yugoslav Academy of Sciences and Arts (Zagreb), the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (Belgrade) and the Matica Srpska (Novi Sad). Stojadinovic?s Open letter was sent on June 28th, 1963. It focused on scrutinizing Krleza?s article Pasic about the Salonika trial published in Politika on June 9th. Both informations stated by Krleza and criticism put forward by Stojadinovic are analyzed in the light of contemporary historiographical knowledge. Different interpretations presented by Krleza and Stojadinovic have their roots in opposed views on causes and results of Salonika trial. Stojadinovic defended the legitimacy of trial started by his father-in-law Ljuba Jovanovic Patak, he was involved in its organisation and later accused of witness tampering. Krleza saw trial in the light of ?counter-revolutionary? Yugoslav unification in 1918 and as an act of ?political and judicial murder?. Article also contains original documents from National Library of Serbia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dragisa Stojadinovic关于Miroslav Krleza“塞尔维亚主题”的公开信
这篇文章探讨了德拉吉萨·斯托亚迪诺维奇对弗伊尔顿?塞尔维亚主题的反应。作者是米罗斯拉夫·克雷扎Krleza吗?1963年4月、5月和6月,《政治报》(Politika)刊登了他的自传。它由他早期作品的片段组成,以主题单位组织,涉及塞尔维亚历史的不同主题。退役军人、第一次世界大战期间在萨洛尼卡前线的塞尔维亚军队电影科科长、两次世界大战期间南斯拉夫的政治家德拉吉萨·斯托亚迪诺维奇对克雷扎?他给南斯拉夫科学与艺术学院(萨格勒布)、塞尔维亚科学与艺术学院(贝尔格莱德)和塞族共和国(诺维萨德)写了一封公开信。Stojadinovic吗?这封公开信是1963年6月28日发出的。专注于调查克莱扎?6月9日,他在《政治报》上发表了一篇关于萨洛尼卡审判的文章。本文从当代史学知识的角度分析了克雷扎所陈述的信息和斯托亚迪诺维奇所提出的批评。Krleza和Stojadinovic提出的不同解释,其根源在于对萨洛尼卡审判的原因和结果的不同看法。Stojadinovic为其岳父Ljuba Jovanovic Patak发起的审判辩护,他参与了该组织,后来被指控篡改证人。克莱扎从反革命的角度看待审判?1918年南斯拉夫统一,并被视为“政治和司法谋杀”。文章还包含塞尔维亚国家图书馆的原始文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Bank performance analysis and identification of key determinants of electronic banking customer satisfaction - balanced scorecard approach Competition among interest group - mechanism and consequences The selection of topics in good practice of teaching the holocaust in England and Republica Srpska: A case study Development, state and perspectives of urban geography with special review of Serbia Ideal fundaments of the history of education as teaching disciplines in Serbia in the 19th century
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1