Defining the Protected Class: Who Qualifies for Protection Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act?

IF 5.2 1区 社会学 Q1 LAW Yale Law Journal Pub Date : 2008-04-01 DOI:10.2307/20454678
Jill E. Habig
{"title":"Defining the Protected Class: Who Qualifies for Protection Under the Pregnancy Discrimination Act?","authors":"Jill E. Habig","doi":"10.2307/20454678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)2 amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964' to combat systemic workplace discrimination against women because of their reproductive capacity. Congress drafted the PDA to frame pregnancy discrimination broadly in pursuit of this ambitious goal, intending to protect women \"before, during, and after\" pregnancy.4 The ambiguity of the Act's text and legislative history, however, has caused confusion in the courts, which have differed in their interpretations of the PDA's scope. Many of these disagreements have centered on what types of employer actions constitute \"discrimination\" and whether the PDA entitles a woman to accommodation or simply protection from discrimination. This Comment focuses instead on a prior question: who is sufficiently \"affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions\"' to qualify for the PDA's protection? This preliminary decision is a crucial, yet underexplored, component of the discussion about the PDA's scope.","PeriodicalId":48293,"journal":{"name":"Yale Law Journal","volume":"2672 1","pages":"1215"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2008-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yale Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20454678","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA)2 amended Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964' to combat systemic workplace discrimination against women because of their reproductive capacity. Congress drafted the PDA to frame pregnancy discrimination broadly in pursuit of this ambitious goal, intending to protect women "before, during, and after" pregnancy.4 The ambiguity of the Act's text and legislative history, however, has caused confusion in the courts, which have differed in their interpretations of the PDA's scope. Many of these disagreements have centered on what types of employer actions constitute "discrimination" and whether the PDA entitles a woman to accommodation or simply protection from discrimination. This Comment focuses instead on a prior question: who is sufficiently "affected by pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions"' to qualify for the PDA's protection? This preliminary decision is a crucial, yet underexplored, component of the discussion about the PDA's scope.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定受保护阶层:谁有资格获得《怀孕歧视法》的保护?
《怀孕歧视法案》(PDA)修订了1964年《民权法案》第七章,以打击因生育能力而在工作场所对妇女的系统性歧视。为了实现这一雄心勃勃的目标,国会起草了PDA,对怀孕歧视进行了广泛的界定,旨在保护“怀孕前、怀孕期间和怀孕后”的妇女然而,该法文本和立法历史的模糊性引起了法院的混淆,法院对PDA的范围有不同的解释。其中许多分歧集中在哪些类型的雇主行为构成“歧视”,以及PDA是否使妇女有权获得便利,还是仅仅是保护妇女免受歧视。这篇评论关注的是先前的一个问题:谁足够“受到怀孕、分娩或相关医疗状况的影响”而有资格获得PDA的保护?这一初步决定是关于PDA范围的讨论中一个至关重要但尚未得到充分探讨的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Yale Law Journal Online is the online companion to The Yale Law Journal. It replaces The Pocket Part, which was the first such companion to be published by a leading law review. YLJ Online will continue The Pocket Part"s mission of augmenting the scholarship printed in The Yale Law Journal by providing original Essays, legal commentaries, responses to articles printed in the Journal, podcast and iTunes University recordings of various pieces, and other works by both established and emerging academics and practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Abolitionist Prison Litigation How to Save the Supreme Court Prosecuting Corporate Crime When Firms Are Too Big to Jail: Investigation, Deterrence, and Judicial Review The Statutory Separation of Powers A Cooperative Federalism Approach to Shareholder Arbitration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1