Trust in Healthcare during COVID-19 in Europe: vulnerable groups trust the least.

Johannes Beller, Jürgen Schäfers, Jörg Haier, Siegfried Geyer, Jelena Epping
{"title":"Trust in Healthcare during COVID-19 in Europe: vulnerable groups trust the least.","authors":"Johannes Beller, Jürgen Schäfers, Jörg Haier, Siegfried Geyer, Jelena Epping","doi":"10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We examined predictors of trust in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic in 27 European countries.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>We used population-based data drawn from the Living, working and COVID-19 survey (<i>N</i> = 21,884, 52% female, ages 18 to 92 years) covering 27 European countries dated June and July 2020. Multilevel linear regression, linear regression, and regression-tree analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that most participants tended to trust the healthcare system, although a substantial part could still be classified as distrusting (approx. 21%). Multiple variables, including being middle-aged or of older age, being female, lower levels of education, unemployment, worse general health status, having income difficulties, having unmet needs for healthcare, no healthcare contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, higher mental distress, and loneliness, were significantly associated with lower levels of trust. Among these variables mental distress, income difficulties, and unmet needs for healthcare emerged as especially important and, across European regions and countries, consistent predictors for lower trust in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medically vulnerable subgroups, such as individuals with unmet healthcare needs, higher levels of mental distress, and older age, as well as people living in socially and economically vulnerable situations, such as higher levels of loneliness and financial difficulties, were the least trusting of the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic. As these vulnerable subgroups are also at highest risk for contracting COVID-19 and experiencing negative COVID-19-related outcomes, more targeted prevention and intervention efforts should be implemented in these groups.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":23839,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8944407/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We examined predictors of trust in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic in 27 European countries.

Subjects and methods: We used population-based data drawn from the Living, working and COVID-19 survey (N = 21,884, 52% female, ages 18 to 92 years) covering 27 European countries dated June and July 2020. Multilevel linear regression, linear regression, and regression-tree analyses were conducted.

Results: We found that most participants tended to trust the healthcare system, although a substantial part could still be classified as distrusting (approx. 21%). Multiple variables, including being middle-aged or of older age, being female, lower levels of education, unemployment, worse general health status, having income difficulties, having unmet needs for healthcare, no healthcare contact during the COVID-19 pandemic, higher mental distress, and loneliness, were significantly associated with lower levels of trust. Among these variables mental distress, income difficulties, and unmet needs for healthcare emerged as especially important and, across European regions and countries, consistent predictors for lower trust in the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusions: Medically vulnerable subgroups, such as individuals with unmet healthcare needs, higher levels of mental distress, and older age, as well as people living in socially and economically vulnerable situations, such as higher levels of loneliness and financial difficulties, were the least trusting of the healthcare system during the COVID-19 pandemic. As these vulnerable subgroups are also at highest risk for contracting COVID-19 and experiencing negative COVID-19-related outcomes, more targeted prevention and intervention efforts should be implemented in these groups.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲 COVID-19 期间对医疗保健的信任度:弱势群体信任度最低。
目的:我们研究了欧洲 27 个国家在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医疗系统信任度的预测因素:我们使用了 2020 年 6 月和 7 月在 27 个欧洲国家进行的 "生活、工作和 COVID-19 调查"(N = 21,884 人,52% 为女性,年龄在 18 岁至 92 岁之间)中获得的人口数据。我们进行了多层次线性回归、线性回归和回归树分析:我们发现,大多数参与者倾向于信任医疗系统,但仍有相当一部分人(约 21%)不信任医疗系统。中年或老年、女性、教育程度较低、失业、总体健康状况较差、收入困难、医疗保健需求未得到满足、在 COVID-19 大流行期间未接触过医疗保健、精神压力较大以及孤独等多个变量与信任度较低有显著关联。在这些变量中,精神痛苦、收入困难和未满足的医疗保健需求尤其重要,而且在欧洲地区和国家中,它们是 COVID-19 大流行期间医疗保健系统信任度较低的一致预测因素:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,在医疗方面处于弱势的亚群体(如医疗需求未得到满足、精神压力较大和年龄较大的个人)以及在社会和经济方面处于弱势的人群(如孤独和经济困难程度较高的人群)最不信任医疗系统。由于这些弱势群体也是感染COVID-19和经历COVID-19相关负面结果的高危人群,因此应在这些群体中开展更有针对性的预防和干预工作:在线版本包含补充材料,可查阅 10.1007/s10389-022-01705-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften
Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
期刊最新文献
A step-by-step researcher's guide to the use of an AI-based transformer in epidemiology: an exploratory analysis of ChatGPT using the STROBE checklist for observational studies A qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers to physical activity among patients with moderate mental disorders. Influences on the uptake of a population health approach to sexual health programs in Ontario public health units: a qualitative descriptive study. Factors associated with the implementation of health-promoting telework from the perspective of company decision makers after the first COVID-19 lockdown How useful is the Making Every Contact Count Healthy Conversation Skills approach for supporting people with musculoskeletal conditions?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1