New Approaches in Soviet Antiquity Studies of the 1950—1970s: Vladislav Andreev’s Case

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY Rossiiskaya Istoriya Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.18254/s207987840024620-1
Anastasia Ashaeva
{"title":"New Approaches in Soviet Antiquity Studies of the 1950—1970s: Vladislav Andreev’s Case","authors":"Anastasia Ashaeva","doi":"10.18254/s207987840024620-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the scientific biography of Vladislav Nikolaevich Andreev (1927—1984), associate professor of the A. I. Herzen Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute. Based on an extensive set of archival documents, including the personal fund of V. N. Andreev, as well as scientific publications of the scientist and published memoirs about him, it will be shown how the Soviet science of antiquity was integrated into the late Soviet ideological structure, which influenced not only the problems of research, but also communication within the scientific community. Scientific problems of V. N. Andreev was associated with the economic life of classical Athens and, in particular, the history of the origin of wealth in ancient Greece. Interdisciplinary topics using the methods of sociology and mathematics in Soviet antiquity did not formally contradict the rules. However, Andreev nevertheless did not fit into any institutional discourse. The use of methods new to the Soviet science of antiquity, as well as fruitful contacts with foreign scientists (for example, with Moses Finley) also predetermined the \"incident\" of V. N. Andreev — his difficulties with defending first a candidate's and then a doctoral dissertation caused by complex relationships with the Leningrad Scientific School of Antiquity. Non-recognition of scientific achievements of V. N. Andreev's Leningrad colleagues vividly contrasted with the high assessments of the scientist's research achievements by foreign colleagues and colleagues from the Soviet Academy of Sciences, with a large number of publications not only in Soviet, but also in foreign publications, contacts with world-famous scientists.","PeriodicalId":43742,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskaya Istoriya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18254/s207987840024620-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the scientific biography of Vladislav Nikolaevich Andreev (1927—1984), associate professor of the A. I. Herzen Leningrad State Pedagogical Institute. Based on an extensive set of archival documents, including the personal fund of V. N. Andreev, as well as scientific publications of the scientist and published memoirs about him, it will be shown how the Soviet science of antiquity was integrated into the late Soviet ideological structure, which influenced not only the problems of research, but also communication within the scientific community. Scientific problems of V. N. Andreev was associated with the economic life of classical Athens and, in particular, the history of the origin of wealth in ancient Greece. Interdisciplinary topics using the methods of sociology and mathematics in Soviet antiquity did not formally contradict the rules. However, Andreev nevertheless did not fit into any institutional discourse. The use of methods new to the Soviet science of antiquity, as well as fruitful contacts with foreign scientists (for example, with Moses Finley) also predetermined the "incident" of V. N. Andreev — his difficulties with defending first a candidate's and then a doctoral dissertation caused by complex relationships with the Leningrad Scientific School of Antiquity. Non-recognition of scientific achievements of V. N. Andreev's Leningrad colleagues vividly contrasted with the high assessments of the scientist's research achievements by foreign colleagues and colleagues from the Soviet Academy of Sciences, with a large number of publications not only in Soviet, but also in foreign publications, contacts with world-famous scientists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1950 - 1970年代苏联古代研究的新途径:弗拉迪斯拉夫·安德烈夫的案例
本文介绍列宁格勒国立赫尔岑师范学院副教授弗拉季斯拉夫·尼古拉耶维奇·安德烈夫(1927-1984)的科学传记。根据大量档案文件,包括V. N. Andreev的个人基金,以及这位科学家的科学出版物和出版的关于他的回忆录,它将展示苏联古代科学如何融入苏联晚期的意识形态结构,这不仅影响了研究问题,也影响了科学界的交流。安德烈夫的科学问题与古典雅典的经济生活有关,特别是与古希腊财富起源的历史有关。在苏联古代,使用社会学和数学方法的跨学科主题并没有正式违反规则。然而,安德烈夫并不适合任何制度话语。苏联古代科学新方法的使用,以及与外国科学家卓有成效的接触(例如,与摩西·芬利)也预先决定了v·n·安德烈夫的“事件”——他先是为候选人辩护,后来又为一篇博士论文辩护,这都是由于他与列宁格勒古代科学学院的复杂关系造成的。安德烈耶夫列宁格勒同事对科学成果的不承认与外国同事和苏联科学院同事对该科学家研究成果的高度评价形成鲜明对比,不仅在苏联,而且在外国出版物上发表了大量论文,与世界著名科学家进行了接触。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visual Narrative and Ktisissagen: New Mosaics on the Foundation of Two Seleukid Cities Poetics of Empire in the Literature of the Early Principate “Insiders Among Outsiders”: Representation of Enemies and Allies in the Texts of British Prisoners of War on the Iberian Peninsula 1808—1814 The Ruling Elite in Russia at the End of the 15th — 17th Сenturies in Modern Russian and Foreign Historiography The Court of the Spanish Habsburgs: Results and Prospects of Researches (Appendix. Interview with Professor Manuel Rivero Rodríguez
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1