{"title":"Assessments of physical activity and cancer risk.","authors":"I. Thune","doi":"10.1097/00008469-200012000-00003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The assessment of physical activity is one of the most important methodological issues in research into physical activity and cancer risk. A sedentary Western lifestyle has been observed to influence biological mechanisms promoting development of certain types of cancer. At present the totality of evidence supports a protective effect against cancers of the colon and probably the breast, while further data concerning carcinoma of other cancers are required. Thus, physical activity represents a powerful public health measure for reducing cancer risk. Studies of the association between physical activity and cancer risk have used a great variety of methods, but have most often included work and/or leisure time activity. Questionnaires are the method most often used and various components of physical activity such as type, frequency, intensity and lifetime physical activity have been recorded. However, the measurements used when assessing physical activity have been hampered by lack of accuracy as regards validity and reliability, missing information on the various components of physical activity and sparse information of lifetime exposure, and often no repeat assessments in cohort studies. Discrepancies between studies elaborating the association between physical activity and site-specific cancer risk may be explained through real differences or lack of information on the various components of physical activity (type, intensity, duration) and incomplete information about the cancer type studied (localization, histological type). The complicated nature of the variable physical activity, combined with incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of most cancer and lack of knowledge regarding possible biological mechanisms operating between physical activity and cancer, warrants further studies. In these studies methodological improvements in measuring physical activity, combined with inclusion of physiological markers (heart rate, energy balance, hormonal levels, etc.) reflecting the variety of physical activities performed are of particular interest. Assessing biomarkers and intermediate steps for site-specific cancer risk may give us further insight into the relation between physical activity and cancer that will be of enormous interest for public health recommendations.","PeriodicalId":11950,"journal":{"name":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200012000-00003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

The assessment of physical activity is one of the most important methodological issues in research into physical activity and cancer risk. A sedentary Western lifestyle has been observed to influence biological mechanisms promoting development of certain types of cancer. At present the totality of evidence supports a protective effect against cancers of the colon and probably the breast, while further data concerning carcinoma of other cancers are required. Thus, physical activity represents a powerful public health measure for reducing cancer risk. Studies of the association between physical activity and cancer risk have used a great variety of methods, but have most often included work and/or leisure time activity. Questionnaires are the method most often used and various components of physical activity such as type, frequency, intensity and lifetime physical activity have been recorded. However, the measurements used when assessing physical activity have been hampered by lack of accuracy as regards validity and reliability, missing information on the various components of physical activity and sparse information of lifetime exposure, and often no repeat assessments in cohort studies. Discrepancies between studies elaborating the association between physical activity and site-specific cancer risk may be explained through real differences or lack of information on the various components of physical activity (type, intensity, duration) and incomplete information about the cancer type studied (localization, histological type). The complicated nature of the variable physical activity, combined with incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis of most cancer and lack of knowledge regarding possible biological mechanisms operating between physical activity and cancer, warrants further studies. In these studies methodological improvements in measuring physical activity, combined with inclusion of physiological markers (heart rate, energy balance, hormonal levels, etc.) reflecting the variety of physical activities performed are of particular interest. Assessing biomarkers and intermediate steps for site-specific cancer risk may give us further insight into the relation between physical activity and cancer that will be of enormous interest for public health recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体育活动和癌症风险的评估。
体育活动的评估是体育活动与癌症风险研究中最重要的方法学问题之一。据观察,久坐不动的西方生活方式会影响促进某些类型癌症发展的生物学机制。目前,所有的证据都支持它对结肠癌和乳腺癌有保护作用,但关于其他癌症的数据还有待进一步研究。因此,体育活动是降低癌症风险的有力公共卫生措施。体育活动与癌症风险之间关系的研究使用了多种方法,但最常见的是包括工作和/或休闲时间的活动。问卷调查是最常用的方法,记录了身体活动的各种组成部分,如类型、频率、强度和终生身体活动。然而,在评估身体活动时使用的测量方法由于缺乏有效性和可靠性方面的准确性,缺乏关于身体活动的各种组成部分的信息和终生暴露的稀疏信息,以及在队列研究中通常没有重复评估而受到阻碍。阐明身体活动与特定部位癌症风险之间关系的研究之间的差异,可能是由于对身体活动的各种组成部分(类型、强度、持续时间)的实际差异或信息的缺乏,以及对所研究的癌症类型(定位、组织学类型)的信息不完整。可变体育活动的复杂性,加上对大多数癌症发病机制的不完全了解,以及对体育活动与癌症之间可能的生物学机制缺乏了解,值得进一步研究。在这些研究中,测量身体活动的方法学改进,结合反映身体活动多样性的生理指标(心率、能量平衡、激素水平等)是特别有趣的。评估特定部位癌症风险的生物标志物和中间步骤可能会让我们进一步了解体育活动与癌症之间的关系,这将对公共卫生建议产生巨大的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The PROPHET project paves the way for personalized prevention in the future healthcare. Prostate cancer burden in major BRICS countries, 1990-2019: findings from the 2019 global burden of disease study. Cancer mortality predictions for 2024 in selected Asian countries and Australia with focus on stomach cancer. Non-contrast MRI and post-mastectomy silicone breast implant rupture: preventing false positive diagnoses. Comment to: Inequalities in adherence to cervical cancer screening in Portugal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1