Description of Long Term Outcome of Sublingual Immunotherapy Treatment in Children: A Follow-Up Observation Through Phone Interviews

L. Steiner, T. Engel, A. Nöding, M. Licht, A. Delaney, A. Distler, G. Zwacka, Markert Ur
{"title":"Description of Long Term Outcome of Sublingual Immunotherapy Treatment in Children: A Follow-Up Observation Through Phone Interviews","authors":"L. Steiner, T. Engel, A. Nöding, M. Licht, A. Delaney, A. Distler, G. Zwacka, Markert Ur","doi":"10.2174/1874838400902010030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapies (SLIT) is mostly demonstrated during or immediately af- ter the therapy, but little is reported about long-term efficacy. Patients and Methods: 121 phone interviews were performed to analyze the state of patients after SLIT. All patients were children who were treated in two centers in Germany. Questionnaires were developed and standardized with respect to statistical and social rules. 19 questions were designed to elucidate the subjective estimation of allergic symptoms (con- junctivitis, rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis), duration of therapy (> 2 years), duration of preexisting allergy, type of al- lergen, symptomatical medication, age, gender and others before starting SLIT, immediately after SLIT and 1 to 6 years after having finished the therapy. All interviews were conducted with the patients' mothers. Due to ethical considerations, for this period of up to 9 years after initiation of treatment, formation of a placebo control group was impossible. Results: In summary, the general state of health improved significantly in 93% of all patients during therapy. This was similar for all single symptoms. During the period after therapy, 84% of patients did not feel any worsening of their state and 15% reported a very slight return of symptoms. At the same time, no patient felt worse than before initiating SLIT, and 8% felt similar to the state before. Results were equal 1, 3 and 5 years after termination of SLIT. Conclusion: In comparison to the expectable allergic march, which implicates a high risk of intensifying symptoms in un- treated patients, SLIT treated patients improved and demonstrated a long-lasting clinical effect (5 years) of the therapy. Rates of improvements are higher than spontaneous remissions (age dependently, 5 - 25%) as reported in previous stud- ies.","PeriodicalId":22835,"journal":{"name":"The Open Allergy Journal","volume":"77 1","pages":"30-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Allergy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874838400902010030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Efficacy of sublingual immunotherapies (SLIT) is mostly demonstrated during or immediately af- ter the therapy, but little is reported about long-term efficacy. Patients and Methods: 121 phone interviews were performed to analyze the state of patients after SLIT. All patients were children who were treated in two centers in Germany. Questionnaires were developed and standardized with respect to statistical and social rules. 19 questions were designed to elucidate the subjective estimation of allergic symptoms (con- junctivitis, rhinitis, asthma, atopic dermatitis), duration of therapy (> 2 years), duration of preexisting allergy, type of al- lergen, symptomatical medication, age, gender and others before starting SLIT, immediately after SLIT and 1 to 6 years after having finished the therapy. All interviews were conducted with the patients' mothers. Due to ethical considerations, for this period of up to 9 years after initiation of treatment, formation of a placebo control group was impossible. Results: In summary, the general state of health improved significantly in 93% of all patients during therapy. This was similar for all single symptoms. During the period after therapy, 84% of patients did not feel any worsening of their state and 15% reported a very slight return of symptoms. At the same time, no patient felt worse than before initiating SLIT, and 8% felt similar to the state before. Results were equal 1, 3 and 5 years after termination of SLIT. Conclusion: In comparison to the expectable allergic march, which implicates a high risk of intensifying symptoms in un- treated patients, SLIT treated patients improved and demonstrated a long-lasting clinical effect (5 years) of the therapy. Rates of improvements are higher than spontaneous remissions (age dependently, 5 - 25%) as reported in previous stud- ies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童舌下免疫治疗的长期疗效描述:电话随访观察
背景:舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)的疗效主要体现在治疗过程中或治疗后立即,但很少有关于长期疗效的报道。患者与方法:对121例患者进行了电话访谈,分析了SLIT后患者的状态。所有患者都是在德国两个中心接受治疗的儿童。根据统计和社会规则编制了调查表并使之标准化。设计了19个问题,以阐明过敏症状(结膜炎、鼻炎、哮喘、特应性皮炎)、治疗持续时间(bb0 - 2年)、既往过敏持续时间、过敏原类型、对症用药、年龄、性别等的主观评估,以及开始SLIT前、SLIT后立即和完成治疗后1 - 6年。所有访谈均与患者母亲进行。出于伦理考虑,在治疗开始后长达9年的时间里,不可能形成安慰剂对照组。结果:总的来说,93%的患者在治疗期间总体健康状况明显改善。所有单一症状都是相似的。在治疗后的一段时间内,84%的患者没有感觉到他们的状态有任何恶化,15%的患者报告有非常轻微的症状复发。同时,没有患者感觉比开始SLIT前更糟,8%的患者感觉与开始SLIT前相似。终止SLIT后1、3、5年的结果相同。结论:与预期的过敏进展相比,未治疗患者的过敏进展意味着症状加剧的高风险,SLIT治疗的患者得到改善,并显示出持久的临床效果(5年)。在以前的研究中,改善率高于自发缓解率(与年龄有关,5 - 25%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Asthma-Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Overlap Syndrome (ACOS) are Risk Factors for Cryptococcosis Association Between Endoscopic, Radiologic and Patient-reported Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Food Allergy Knowledge and Attitudes Among School Teachers in Jazan, Saudi Arabia Anaphylaxis to Glatiramer Acetate Dynamics of Plasma and Granule Membrane in Murine Bone Marrow- Derived Mast Cells after Re-stimulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1