Determination of death.

Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, Dear Assemblyman Miller
{"title":"Determination of death.","authors":"Rabbi Moshe Feinstein, Dear Assemblyman Miller","doi":"10.1001/jama.1892.02411110025011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is my carefully considered opinion that: 1) This bill as written is and has always been unacceptable. 2) Any bill defining death must contain the following clarification as I wrote in my responsum: “The sole criterion of death is the total cessation of spontaneous respiration.” In a patient presenting the clinical picture of death, i.e., no signs of life such as movement of response to stimuli, the total cessation of independent respiration, is an absolute proof that death had occurred. This interruption of spontaneous breathing must be for a sufficient length of time for resuscitation to be impossible (approximately 15 min.). If such a “clinically dead” patient is on a respirator it is forbidden to interrupt the respirator. However, when the respirator requires servicing, the services may be withheld while the patient is carefully and continuously monitored to detect any signs of independent breathing no matter how feeble. If such breathing motions do not occur, it is a certainty that he is dead. If they do occur the respirator shall be immediately restarted. I must emphasize that any bill which does not contain these criteria is unacceptable. 3) In the event that these specific requirements will not be incorporated in your bill, I strongly endorse and support the “religious exemption” clause in the Governor’s Program Bill, a concept which is in keeping with religious rights and social ethics.","PeriodicalId":83659,"journal":{"name":"Code of Alabama, 1975 : with provision for subsequent pocket parts. Alabama","volume":"46 1","pages":"Unknown"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Code of Alabama, 1975 : with provision for subsequent pocket parts. Alabama","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1892.02411110025011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is my carefully considered opinion that: 1) This bill as written is and has always been unacceptable. 2) Any bill defining death must contain the following clarification as I wrote in my responsum: “The sole criterion of death is the total cessation of spontaneous respiration.” In a patient presenting the clinical picture of death, i.e., no signs of life such as movement of response to stimuli, the total cessation of independent respiration, is an absolute proof that death had occurred. This interruption of spontaneous breathing must be for a sufficient length of time for resuscitation to be impossible (approximately 15 min.). If such a “clinically dead” patient is on a respirator it is forbidden to interrupt the respirator. However, when the respirator requires servicing, the services may be withheld while the patient is carefully and continuously monitored to detect any signs of independent breathing no matter how feeble. If such breathing motions do not occur, it is a certainty that he is dead. If they do occur the respirator shall be immediately restarted. I must emphasize that any bill which does not contain these criteria is unacceptable. 3) In the event that these specific requirements will not be incorporated in your bill, I strongly endorse and support the “religious exemption” clause in the Governor’s Program Bill, a concept which is in keeping with religious rights and social ethics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
死亡的判定。
这是我经过深思熟虑的意见:1)这份书面的法案是而且一直是不可接受的。2)任何定义死亡的法案都必须包含以下澄清,正如我在回复中所写的:“死亡的唯一标准是完全停止自主呼吸。”如果患者表现出死亡的临床症状,即没有生命迹象,如对刺激的反应运动,完全停止独立呼吸,则绝对证明死亡已经发生。这种自发呼吸的中断必须持续足够长的时间,使复苏成为不可能(大约15分钟)。如果这样的“临床死亡”患者正在使用呼吸器,则禁止中断呼吸器。然而,当呼吸器需要维修时,在仔细和持续监测患者以检测任何独立呼吸的迹象(无论多么微弱)时,可能会暂停服务。如果没有这样的呼吸运动,就可以确定他已经死了。如果发生,应立即重新启动呼吸器。我必须强调,任何不包含这些标准的法案都是不可接受的。3)如果这些具体要求不会纳入您的法案,我强烈赞同并支持州长计划法案中的“宗教豁免”条款,这一概念符合宗教权利和社会伦理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determination of death. Determination of death. Inhalt Erste Ergebnisse von Versuchen zur Ertragsregulierung mit 2-Chloräthylphosphonsäure bei Apfel Thesen zur Reproduktion der Bodenfruchtbarkeit beim Übergang zur industriemäßigen Pflanzenproduktion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1