A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ESL LEARNER'S PERCEPTION OF VIRTUAL LEARNING VS TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN THE AGE OF CONVERGENCE - A CASE STUDY AT JAZAN UNIVERSITY KSA

Heena Nadeem Ansari
{"title":"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ESL LEARNER'S PERCEPTION OF VIRTUAL LEARNING VS TRADITIONAL LEARNING IN THE AGE OF CONVERGENCE - A CASE STUDY AT JAZAN UNIVERSITY KSA","authors":"Heena Nadeem Ansari","doi":"10.54513/joell.2023.10102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of Covid-19 created the stipulation for virtual learning as a teaching platform. This study aims to ascertain the perception of ESL learners about virtual education in contrast with the Traditional one in the age of convergence. The comparative analysis will focus on fathoming the influence of these two platforms' engagement and interaction intensity with the ESL learners and the repercussion of the teaching and learning styles adopted to compete for the hostile circumstances of Covid-19. The methodology used is the quantitative comparative analytical method of research. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect initial data from two samples of classroom size of 60 each; adopted one population from virtual learning and another from a traditional setting. The finding shows that the sample of the virtual learning could have been more satisfied with the engagement, interaction and teaching methods. In contrast, the second sample experienced a wide variety of exposure to the learning style, communications, and engagement and was satisfied with traditional learning. Therefore, to increase the activities and study convenience, blended learning would be a better option to improve learners' contentment.","PeriodicalId":42230,"journal":{"name":"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asiatic-IIUM Journal of English Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54513/joell.2023.10102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of Covid-19 created the stipulation for virtual learning as a teaching platform. This study aims to ascertain the perception of ESL learners about virtual education in contrast with the Traditional one in the age of convergence. The comparative analysis will focus on fathoming the influence of these two platforms' engagement and interaction intensity with the ESL learners and the repercussion of the teaching and learning styles adopted to compete for the hostile circumstances of Covid-19. The methodology used is the quantitative comparative analytical method of research. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect initial data from two samples of classroom size of 60 each; adopted one population from virtual learning and another from a traditional setting. The finding shows that the sample of the virtual learning could have been more satisfied with the engagement, interaction and teaching methods. In contrast, the second sample experienced a wide variety of exposure to the learning style, communications, and engagement and was satisfied with traditional learning. Therefore, to increase the activities and study convenience, blended learning would be a better option to improve learners' contentment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
融合时代esl学习者对虚拟学习与传统学习认知的比较分析——以吉赞大学为例
新冠肺炎疫情的出现催生了虚拟学习作为教学平台的规定。本研究旨在了解融合时代ESL学习者对虚拟教育与传统教育的看法。对比分析将侧重于了解这两个平台对ESL学习者的参与度和互动强度的影响,以及为应对Covid-19的敌对环境而采取的教学方式的影响。所采用的研究方法是定量比较分析法。使用电子问卷收集两个样本的初始数据,每个样本的教室规模为60;从虚拟学习中选取一组,从传统环境中选取另一组。研究结果表明,虚拟学习的样本本可以对虚拟学习的参与性、互动性和教学方法更满意。相比之下,第二个样本经历了各种各样的学习方式、交流和参与,并对传统学习感到满意。因此,为了增加活动和学习的便利性,混合学习将是一个更好的选择,以提高学习者的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Asiatic is the very first international journal on English writings by Asian writers and writers of Asian origin, currently being the only one of its kind. It aims to publish high-quality researches and outstanding creative works combining the broad fields of literature and linguistics on the same intellectual platform. Asiatic will contain a rich collection of selected articles on issues that deal with Asian Englishes, Asian cultures and Asian literatures in English, including diasporic literature and Asian literatures in translation. Articles may include studies that address the multidimensional impacts of the English Language on a wide variety of Asian cultures (South Asian, East Asian, Southeast Asian and others). Subjects of debates and discussions will encompass the socio-economic facet of the Asian world in relation to current academic investigations on literature, culture and linguistics. This approach will present the works of English-trained Asian writers and scholars, having English as the unifying device and Asia as a fundamental backdrop of their study. The three different segments that will be featured in each issue of Asiatic are: (i) critical writings on literary, cultural and linguistics studies, (ii) creative writings that include works of prose fiction and selections of poetry and (iv) review articles on Asian books, novels and plays produced in English (or translated into English). These works will reflect how elements of western and Asian are both subtly and intensely intertwined as a result of acculturation, globalisation and such.
期刊最新文献
THE TRIPARTITE RELATIONSHIP AMONG EFL TEACHERS’ COGNITION, PERCEIVED AND ACTUAL CLASSROOM PRACTICES OF READING INSTRUCTION THE ASSOCIATION OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND SOCIETY IN INDIAN CONTEXT ON THE WITCH IMAGE OF HESTER MOTIVATION TO LEARN ENGLISH AND USE OF COMMUNICATION STRATEGIES RETREVING KEY INSIGHTS FROM KHUSHWANT SINGH’S SHORT STORIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1