Creation of a Myth: Rethinking the Cultural Heritage Sites of the Crimea in the Late 18th and 19th Centuries

N. Khrapunov
{"title":"Creation of a Myth: Rethinking the Cultural Heritage Sites of the Crimea in the Late 18th and 19th Centuries","authors":"N. Khrapunov","doi":"10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the myths which appeared around some local archaeological and architectonic sites after the Crimea’s incorporation into Russia in 1783. The author refers to legends of the flood developing around the mediaeval “cave towns”, the remnants of the temple of Tauric Diana, the imprints of St Andrew’s feet, the turbe at the mediaeval town of Chufut-Kale, and Maria Potocka as a captive of the Crimean khan’s harem. The author demonstrates the multidirectional intellectual interactions of various social groups such as local populations, migrants, and learned travellers representing different cultures and countries. It has been shown that the greatest role for the mythologisation of the sites was played by Russian and foreign travelogues which interpreted particular monuments as tourist attractions and drew their readers’ attention to them. By that moment, the real history of the sites had already been forgotten. Moreover, educated travellers knew some plots of classical history which allegedly happened in the peninsula, and therefore tried to “find” their traces amidst Crimean landscapes. The travellers also perceived Crimean Tatar legends and transformed them in a new manner. The locals, in their own turn, understood the tales produced by foreign intellectuals as parts of their own local history. A particular phenomenon comprises the attempts of the Christian migrants to the Crimea to find “support” among the monuments which they interpreted as very old Christian shrines related to the events known from the books. As a result, there appeared incorrect interpretations of the sites, which, because of their romantic and fascinating nature, became imprinted in public mind. This process contributed to the turning of some cultural heritage sites into tourist attractions and therefore made an impact on the establishment of the Crimea as a tourist centre.","PeriodicalId":42281,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo Universiteta-Seriya 2-Gumanitarnye Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15826/izv2.2022.24.2.033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the myths which appeared around some local archaeological and architectonic sites after the Crimea’s incorporation into Russia in 1783. The author refers to legends of the flood developing around the mediaeval “cave towns”, the remnants of the temple of Tauric Diana, the imprints of St Andrew’s feet, the turbe at the mediaeval town of Chufut-Kale, and Maria Potocka as a captive of the Crimean khan’s harem. The author demonstrates the multidirectional intellectual interactions of various social groups such as local populations, migrants, and learned travellers representing different cultures and countries. It has been shown that the greatest role for the mythologisation of the sites was played by Russian and foreign travelogues which interpreted particular monuments as tourist attractions and drew their readers’ attention to them. By that moment, the real history of the sites had already been forgotten. Moreover, educated travellers knew some plots of classical history which allegedly happened in the peninsula, and therefore tried to “find” their traces amidst Crimean landscapes. The travellers also perceived Crimean Tatar legends and transformed them in a new manner. The locals, in their own turn, understood the tales produced by foreign intellectuals as parts of their own local history. A particular phenomenon comprises the attempts of the Christian migrants to the Crimea to find “support” among the monuments which they interpreted as very old Christian shrines related to the events known from the books. As a result, there appeared incorrect interpretations of the sites, which, because of their romantic and fascinating nature, became imprinted in public mind. This process contributed to the turning of some cultural heritage sites into tourist attractions and therefore made an impact on the establishment of the Crimea as a tourist centre.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神话的创造:对18世纪末和19世纪克里米亚文化遗产遗址的再思考
本文分析了1783年克里米亚并入俄罗斯后,一些地方考古和建筑遗址周围出现的神话。作者提到了洪水在中世纪“洞穴城镇”周围发展的传说,陶里克·戴安娜神庙的遗迹,圣安德鲁的脚印,中世纪城镇Chufut-Kale的turbe,以及玛丽亚·波托卡作为克里米亚可汗后宫的俘虏。作者展示了各种社会群体,如当地居民、移民和代表不同文化和国家的有学问的旅行者之间的多向智力互动。有证据表明,俄罗斯和外国的游记家在这些遗址的神话化中发挥了最大的作用,他们将特定的纪念碑解释为旅游景点,并吸引了读者的注意力。到那时,这些遗址的真实历史已经被遗忘了。此外,受过教育的旅行者知道一些据称发生在半岛上的古典历史情节,因此试图在克里米亚的风景中“寻找”它们的痕迹。旅行者们也理解了克里米亚鞑靼人的传说,并以一种新的方式对它们进行了改造。而当地人则把外国知识分子创作的故事理解为他们自己当地历史的一部分。一个特别的现象是,前往克里米亚的基督徒移民试图在纪念碑中寻找“支持”,他们将这些纪念碑解释为与书中所知事件相关的非常古老的基督教圣地。结果,出现了对这些遗址的不正确解释,这些遗址由于其浪漫和迷人的性质,在公众心目中留下了深刻的印象。这一进程有助于将一些文化遗产变成旅游景点,因此对建立克里米亚作为旅游中心产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Elite of Sýrnesgarðr: On the Social Stratification of the Population of the Gnyozdovo Archaeological Complex, 10th — Early 11th Centuries Paints of Old Believer Carved Icons of the Lower Pechora: Technical, Technological, Historical, and Archival Aspects of Study Cultural Heritage Protection in the Notes of the Ural Society of Devotees of Natural Science (Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries) Environmental Lessons of Virgin Lands: Organisational and Scientific Aspects Dualistic Rethinking of the Christian Myth by Philip Pullman
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1