Predicting Velocity and Direction of Ocean Surface Currents using Elman Recurrent Neural Network Method

Eka Alifia Kusnanti, D. C. R. Novitasari, F. Setiawan, Aris Fanani, M. Hafiyusholeh, Ghaluh Indah Permata Sari
{"title":"Predicting Velocity and Direction of Ocean Surface Currents using Elman Recurrent Neural Network Method","authors":"Eka Alifia Kusnanti, D. C. R. Novitasari, F. Setiawan, Aris Fanani, M. Hafiyusholeh, Ghaluh Indah Permata Sari","doi":"10.20473/jisebi.8.1.21-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ocean surface currents need to be monitored to minimize accidents at ship crossings. One way to predict ocean currents—and estimate the danger level of the sea—is by finding out the currents’ velocity and their future direction.\nObjective: This study aims to predict the velocity and direction of ocean surface currents.\nMethods: This research uses the Elman recurrent neural network (ERNN). This study used 3,750 long-term data and 72 short-term data.\nResults: The evaluation with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) achieved the best results in short-term predictions. The best MAPE of the U currents (east to west) was 14.0279% with five inputs; the first and second hidden layers were 50 and 100, and the learning rate was 0.3. While the best MAPE of the V currents (north to south) was 3.1253% with five inputs, the first and second hidden layers were 20 and 50, and the learning rate was 0.1. The ocean surface currents’ prediction indicates that the current state is from east to south with a magnitude of around 169,5773°-175,7127° resulting in a MAPE of 0.0668%.\nConclusion: ERNN is more effective than single exponential smoothing and RBFNN in ocean current prediction studies because it produces a smaller error value. In addition, the ERNN method is good for short-term ocean surface currents but is not optimal for long-term current predictions.\nKeywords: MAPE, ERNN, ocean currents, ocean currents’ velocity, ocean currents’ directions","PeriodicalId":16185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.8.1.21-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Ocean surface currents need to be monitored to minimize accidents at ship crossings. One way to predict ocean currents—and estimate the danger level of the sea—is by finding out the currents’ velocity and their future direction. Objective: This study aims to predict the velocity and direction of ocean surface currents. Methods: This research uses the Elman recurrent neural network (ERNN). This study used 3,750 long-term data and 72 short-term data. Results: The evaluation with Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) achieved the best results in short-term predictions. The best MAPE of the U currents (east to west) was 14.0279% with five inputs; the first and second hidden layers were 50 and 100, and the learning rate was 0.3. While the best MAPE of the V currents (north to south) was 3.1253% with five inputs, the first and second hidden layers were 20 and 50, and the learning rate was 0.1. The ocean surface currents’ prediction indicates that the current state is from east to south with a magnitude of around 169,5773°-175,7127° resulting in a MAPE of 0.0668%. Conclusion: ERNN is more effective than single exponential smoothing and RBFNN in ocean current prediction studies because it produces a smaller error value. In addition, the ERNN method is good for short-term ocean surface currents but is not optimal for long-term current predictions. Keywords: MAPE, ERNN, ocean currents, ocean currents’ velocity, ocean currents’ directions
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用Elman递归神经网络方法预测海流速度和方向
背景:需要监测海洋表面洋流,以尽量减少船舶过境时的事故。预测洋流和估计海洋危险程度的一种方法是找出洋流的速度和未来的方向。目的:预测海洋表面洋流的速度和方向。方法:本研究采用Elman递归神经网络(ERNN)。这项研究使用了3750个长期数据和72个短期数据。结果:平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)评价在短期预测中效果最好。5路输入时,U型电流(东向西)的最佳MAPE为14.0279%;第一层和第二层隐藏层分别为50层和100层,学习率为0.3。5个输入时,V电流(从北向南)的最佳MAPE为3.1253%,第一层和第二层隐藏层分别为20层和50层,学习率为0.1。海流预测表明,海流状态为自东向南,震级约为169、5773°~ 175、7127°,MAPE为0.0668%。结论:相对于单指数平滑和RBFNN, ERNN在海流预测研究中误差值较小,具有较好的效果。此外,ERNN方法对短期海流预报效果较好,但对长期海流预报效果不佳。关键词:MAPE, ERNN,洋流,洋流速度,洋流方向
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sentiment Analysis on a Large Indonesian Product Review Dataset Leveraging Biotic Interaction Knowledge Graph and Network Analysis to Uncover Insect Vectors of Plant Virus Model-based Decision Support System Using a System Dynamics Approach to Increase Corn Productivity Optimizing Support Vector Machine Performance for Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis Using GridSearchCV and PCA-Based Feature Extraction A Practical Approach to Enhance Data Quality Management in Government: Case Study of Indonesian Customs and Excise Office
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1