Knowledge, attitude, and practices of patient relatives regarding face masks in COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center cross-sectional study

Anirban Das, Preetam Goswami, Pronoy Sen
{"title":"Knowledge, attitude, and practices of patient relatives regarding face masks in COVID-19 pandemic: A single-center cross-sectional study","authors":"Anirban Das, Preetam Goswami, Pronoy Sen","doi":"10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_43_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was declared as a global pandemic on the March 12, 2020. Face masks are recommended to control COVID-19 transmission, whose filtering capability depends on the different materials mask is made of and its structural design. The knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward facemasks play an integral role to understand society's readiness to accept and follow preventive guidelines. The main objective was to estimate various factors affecting KAP in the study population and also to calculate the knowledge score (KS) from the data. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 5, 3, and 5 questions on KAP, respectively. Score of 1 was assigned to the correct response and score of 0 for the incorrect response. Accordingly, score of <3 depicted that individual had poor knowledge, while ≥3 indicated good knowledge. Data were analyzed using appropriate descriptive statistical tests. An independent t-test was used to determine differences in groups concerning mask usage. Results: Out of total 110 participants, majority were males (53.6%). Majority (78.2%) had a good KS and the mean KS was 3.41. The KS was higher in the 18–40 years age group (P = 0.026), males (P = 0.030), literate people (P = 0.011), and in the urban population (P = 0.021). Majority (97.3%) knew that it is necessary to wear face mask during this pandemic. Participants with higher KS covered both their nose and mouth with face mask and also, they removed their mask completely while eating. Conclusions: Most of the patient's relatives had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practices toward the use of face masks to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the community.","PeriodicalId":93784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","volume":"30 6 1","pages":"78 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary care specialties : official publication of the Institute of Family Medicine and Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jopcs.jopcs_43_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic was declared as a global pandemic on the March 12, 2020. Face masks are recommended to control COVID-19 transmission, whose filtering capability depends on the different materials mask is made of and its structural design. The knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) toward facemasks play an integral role to understand society's readiness to accept and follow preventive guidelines. The main objective was to estimate various factors affecting KAP in the study population and also to calculate the knowledge score (KS) from the data. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 5, 3, and 5 questions on KAP, respectively. Score of 1 was assigned to the correct response and score of 0 for the incorrect response. Accordingly, score of <3 depicted that individual had poor knowledge, while ≥3 indicated good knowledge. Data were analyzed using appropriate descriptive statistical tests. An independent t-test was used to determine differences in groups concerning mask usage. Results: Out of total 110 participants, majority were males (53.6%). Majority (78.2%) had a good KS and the mean KS was 3.41. The KS was higher in the 18–40 years age group (P = 0.026), males (P = 0.030), literate people (P = 0.011), and in the urban population (P = 0.021). Majority (97.3%) knew that it is necessary to wear face mask during this pandemic. Participants with higher KS covered both their nose and mouth with face mask and also, they removed their mask completely while eating. Conclusions: Most of the patient's relatives had satisfactory knowledge, a positive attitude, and good practices toward the use of face masks to limit the spread of COVID-19 in the community.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行患者家属对口罩的知识、态度和实践:一项单中心横断面研究
目的:2020年3月12日,新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行宣布为全球大流行。建议使用口罩控制新冠病毒传播,口罩的过滤能力取决于口罩的材质和结构设计。关于口罩的知识、态度和实践(KAP)在了解社会是否愿意接受和遵循预防指南方面发挥着不可或缺的作用。主要目的是估计影响研究人群KAP的各种因素,并从数据中计算知识得分(KS)。材料与方法:采用问卷调查法进行横断面研究。问卷分别包括5题、3题和5题。正确回答得1分,错误回答得0分。因此,得分<3表示个体知识较差,得分≥3表示个体知识较好。使用适当的描述性统计检验对数据进行分析。采用独立t检验来确定各组在口罩使用方面的差异。结果:110名参与者中,男性居多(53.6%)。绝大多数(78.2%)有良好的KS,平均KS为3.41。KS在18-40岁年龄组(P = 0.026)、男性(P = 0.030)、文化人(P = 0.011)和城市人口(P = 0.021)中较高。大多数人(97.3%)知道在这次大流行期间有必要戴口罩。高KS的参与者用口罩遮住了鼻子和嘴巴,而且他们在吃东西的时候完全摘下了口罩。结论:大多数患者家属对佩戴口罩限制COVID-19在社区传播的知识、态度和做法满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cutaneous adverse drug reactions in a tertiary care setup: A cross-sectional observational single-center-based study in Eastern India Knowledge and perceptions of medical students about generic medicines in a medical college in North India Acute undifferentiated fever presenting as multi-organ dysfunction: Narrowing the differential diagnosis A study on patients with pleural effusion with emphasis on pleural fluid adenosine deaminase and pleural biopsy Corticosteroid-induced avascular bone necrosis and possible association with prior COVID-19 infection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1