Preliminary Comparison of the Performance of Thermodynamic Models of the Subsonic Ejector and Turbofan

IF 1.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Strojniski Vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering Pub Date : 2020-05-20 DOI:10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6379
V. Martinaitis, Dovydas Rimdžius, Juozas Bielskus, Giedrė Streckienė, Violeta Motuzienė
{"title":"Preliminary Comparison of the Performance of Thermodynamic Models of the Subsonic Ejector and Turbofan","authors":"V. Martinaitis, Dovydas Rimdžius, Juozas Bielskus, Giedrė Streckienė, Violeta Motuzienė","doi":"10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flow-mixing is common in technological processes, and both ejectors and turbofans can produce an interaction between flows with different energy potentials. Ejectors have been extensively used, and their analytical models have been widely presented. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is a lack of studies exploring the efficiencies of turbofans. The goal of this paper is to compare thermodynamic processes in these devices. Their efficiencies are compared in terms of compression and entrainment ratios. A comprehensive one-dimensional subsonic thermodynamic models of the ejector and turbofan are presented. The quantitative indices are obtained for the same initial conditions expressed as the ratio of differences in enthalpies for ideal compression and ideal expansion. When initial conditions are equal to the numeric value of the combination of the isentropic efficiency of the evaluated components (numerical case 0.16), both devices have the same efficiencies; at lower initial conditions (numerical case 0.10), a turbofan’s entrainment ratio is 1.5 times and compression efficiency 1.25 times higher; at higher values of initial conditions (numerical case 0.28), the ejector is more efficient. Such distinctive characteristics of turbofans and the nature of their variation may correspond to the specific application areas of technological equipment that require certain flow-mixing parameters.","PeriodicalId":49472,"journal":{"name":"Strojniski Vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering","volume":"44 1","pages":"325-336"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strojniski Vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2019.6379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Flow-mixing is common in technological processes, and both ejectors and turbofans can produce an interaction between flows with different energy potentials. Ejectors have been extensively used, and their analytical models have been widely presented. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there is a lack of studies exploring the efficiencies of turbofans. The goal of this paper is to compare thermodynamic processes in these devices. Their efficiencies are compared in terms of compression and entrainment ratios. A comprehensive one-dimensional subsonic thermodynamic models of the ejector and turbofan are presented. The quantitative indices are obtained for the same initial conditions expressed as the ratio of differences in enthalpies for ideal compression and ideal expansion. When initial conditions are equal to the numeric value of the combination of the isentropic efficiency of the evaluated components (numerical case 0.16), both devices have the same efficiencies; at lower initial conditions (numerical case 0.10), a turbofan’s entrainment ratio is 1.5 times and compression efficiency 1.25 times higher; at higher values of initial conditions (numerical case 0.28), the ejector is more efficient. Such distinctive characteristics of turbofans and the nature of their variation may correspond to the specific application areas of technological equipment that require certain flow-mixing parameters.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亚音速喷射器与涡扇热力学模型性能的初步比较
混合流动在工艺过程中是常见的,喷射器和涡扇都可以在具有不同能量势的流动之间产生相互作用。喷射器被广泛应用,其分析模型也被广泛提出。据作者所知,目前还缺乏关于涡轮风扇效率的研究。本文的目的是比较这些装置中的热力学过程。它们的效率是根据压缩率和夹带率进行比较的。提出了一种综合的喷射器和涡扇的一维亚音速热力学模型。在相同的初始条件下,用理想压缩焓差与理想膨胀焓差之比表示得到了定量指标。当初始条件等于所评估组件的等熵效率组合的数值(数值情况为0.16)时,两个设备具有相同的效率;在较低的初始条件下(数值情况为0.10),涡扇的吸入比提高了1.5倍,压缩效率提高了1.25倍;在较高的初始条件值(数值情况为0.28)下,喷射器效率更高。涡扇发动机的这种独特特性及其变化的性质可能对应于需要一定流动混合参数的工艺设备的特定应用领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
17.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: The international journal publishes original and (mini)review articles covering the concepts of materials science, mechanics, kinematics, thermodynamics, energy and environment, mechatronics and robotics, fluid mechanics, tribology, cybernetics, industrial engineering and structural analysis. The journal follows new trends and progress proven practice in the mechanical engineering and also in the closely related sciences as are electrical, civil and process engineering, medicine, microbiology, ecology, agriculture, transport systems, aviation, and others, thus creating a unique forum for interdisciplinary or multidisciplinary dialogue.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Modelling, Experimental Identification and Computer Simulations of Non-Stationary Vibration in High-Speed Elevators Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Pump Penetration Shell Accounting for Material and Geometric Non-Linearity Flat Specimen Shape Recognition Based on Full-Field Optical Measurements and Registration Using Mapping Error Minimization Method Optimization of the Internal Roller Burnishing Process for Energy Reduction and Surface Properties Residual, Corrosion & Tribological Behavior of HVOF Sprayed Sustainable Temperature-Dependent Carbon-Based Hybrid Composite Coating
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1