Sally Engle Merry: Shaping the Anthropology of Law

Mark Goodale
{"title":"Sally Engle Merry: Shaping the Anthropology of Law","authors":"Mark Goodale","doi":"10.1080/07329113.2021.1880149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I am grateful to the editors of the Journal of Legal Pluralism for asking me to offer some reflections on the contributions of Sally Engle Merry to the anthropology of law. Rather than a more traditional \"in memoriam\" or obituary, I thought that I would provide a more substantive discussion of the ways in which Sally’s professional life and research career shaped the field in ways that will be felt for many years to come. These contributions can be divided into three categories: institutional, intellectual, and methodological. In describing the ways in which Sally shaped the development of the anthropology of law through these three categories, I will only highlight the key interventions or concepts that seem to me to best crystallize the scope of Sally’s lasting influence. Institutionally, Sally played a fundamental role in promoting the growth of the anthropology of law both within and beyond the discipline. Her entry to the field in the early to mid-1980s coincided with the rapid expansion of what is called in the United States the law and society movement, which gives some indication of the way in which scholars wanted to do more than simply conduct sociolegal research: they wanted to transform the understanding of law itself by studying it as a consequential social process. Within the law and society movement, Sally became one of the leading voices for anthropology and the ethnographic approach to sociolegal research. Along with a few other anthropologists at the time, Sally worked to ensure that the anthropology of law became well-established among the other, and typically more powerful, disciplines—academic law, political science, sociology—that constituted the core of the law and society project. Her success as an advocate for the anthropology of law within the US Law and Society Association (LSA) was marked by a number of high-level accomplishments: she served as LSA President from 1993-1995; she won the LSA’s book prize in sociolegal history in 2002 (for Colonizing Hawai’i: The Cultural Power of Law, published by Princeton University Press); and, in 2007, was awarded the LSA’s most prestigious award, the Harry J. Kalven Jr. Prize, which is given to scholars who are held in the highest regard by their colleagues (the official description is for \"empirical scholarship that has contributed most effectively to the advancement of research in law and society\").","PeriodicalId":44432,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2021.1880149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I am grateful to the editors of the Journal of Legal Pluralism for asking me to offer some reflections on the contributions of Sally Engle Merry to the anthropology of law. Rather than a more traditional "in memoriam" or obituary, I thought that I would provide a more substantive discussion of the ways in which Sally’s professional life and research career shaped the field in ways that will be felt for many years to come. These contributions can be divided into three categories: institutional, intellectual, and methodological. In describing the ways in which Sally shaped the development of the anthropology of law through these three categories, I will only highlight the key interventions or concepts that seem to me to best crystallize the scope of Sally’s lasting influence. Institutionally, Sally played a fundamental role in promoting the growth of the anthropology of law both within and beyond the discipline. Her entry to the field in the early to mid-1980s coincided with the rapid expansion of what is called in the United States the law and society movement, which gives some indication of the way in which scholars wanted to do more than simply conduct sociolegal research: they wanted to transform the understanding of law itself by studying it as a consequential social process. Within the law and society movement, Sally became one of the leading voices for anthropology and the ethnographic approach to sociolegal research. Along with a few other anthropologists at the time, Sally worked to ensure that the anthropology of law became well-established among the other, and typically more powerful, disciplines—academic law, political science, sociology—that constituted the core of the law and society project. Her success as an advocate for the anthropology of law within the US Law and Society Association (LSA) was marked by a number of high-level accomplishments: she served as LSA President from 1993-1995; she won the LSA’s book prize in sociolegal history in 2002 (for Colonizing Hawai’i: The Cultural Power of Law, published by Princeton University Press); and, in 2007, was awarded the LSA’s most prestigious award, the Harry J. Kalven Jr. Prize, which is given to scholars who are held in the highest regard by their colleagues (the official description is for "empirical scholarship that has contributed most effectively to the advancement of research in law and society").
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
莎莉·恩格尔·梅里:塑造法律人类学
我很感谢《法律多元主义杂志》的编辑们邀请我就Sally Engle Merry对法律人类学的贡献发表一些看法。比起传统的“悼念”或讣告,我想我应该提供一个更实质性的讨论,讨论Sally的职业生涯和研究生涯如何塑造了这个领域,而这些影响将在未来许多年里被感受到。这些贡献可以分为三类:制度上的、知识上的和方法论上的。在描述莎莉通过这三个类别塑造法律人类学发展的方式时,我将只强调在我看来最能明确莎莉持久影响范围的关键干预或概念。在制度上,莎莉在促进法律人类学学科内外的发展方面发挥了根本性的作用。她在20世纪80年代早期到中期进入这个领域,与美国所谓的“法律与社会运动”的迅速扩张相吻合,这表明学者们想要做的不仅仅是进行社会法律研究:他们想通过将法律作为一个相应的社会过程来研究,从而改变对法律本身的理解。在法律和社会运动中,莎莉成为人类学和民族志方法在社会法律研究中的主要声音之一。与当时的其他几位人类学家一起,莎莉努力确保法律人类学在其他学科(通常是更强大的学科——学术法学、政治学、社会学)中得到完善,这些学科构成了法律与社会项目的核心。作为美国法律与社会协会(LSA)法律人类学的倡导者,她取得了一系列高水平的成就:1993年至1995年,她担任美国法律与社会协会主席;2002年,她凭借《殖民夏威夷:法律的文化力量》(普林斯顿大学出版社出版)获得美国法律学会社会法律史图书奖;2007年,他获得了美国法律学会最负盛名的奖项——小哈里·j·卡尔文奖(Harry J. Kalven Jr. Prize),该奖项颁发给那些受到同行最高尊敬的学者(官方的描述是“对法律和社会研究的进步做出最有效贡献的实证奖学金”)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: As the pioneering journal in this field The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law (JLP) has a long history of publishing leading scholarship in the area of legal anthropology and legal pluralism and is the only international journal dedicated to the analysis of legal pluralism. It is a refereed scholarly journal with a genuinely global reach, publishing both empirical and theoretical contributions from a variety of disciplines, including (but not restricted to) Anthropology, Legal Studies, Development Studies and interdisciplinary studies. The JLP is devoted to scholarly writing and works that further current debates in the field of legal pluralism and to disseminating new and emerging findings from fieldwork. The Journal welcomes papers that make original contributions to understanding any aspect of legal pluralism and unofficial law, anywhere in the world, both in historic and contemporary contexts. We invite high-quality, original submissions that engage with this purpose.
期刊最新文献
Construing the transformed property paradigm of South Africa’s water law: new opportunities presented by legal pluralism? Wait, what are we fighting about? – Kelsen, Ehrlich and the reconciliation of normative jurisprudence and sociology of law Interview article: water movements’ defense of the right to water. From the European arena to the Dutch exception Scientific versus folk legal pluralism An exploration of legal pluralism, power and custom in South Africa. A conversation with Aninka Claassens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1