Identification of Ascitic Fluid Bacterial Pathogens in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Nile Delta and Its Impact on Clinical Outcome of these Patients

S. Abd-Elsalam
{"title":"Identification of Ascitic Fluid Bacterial Pathogens in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Nile Delta and Its Impact on Clinical Outcome of these Patients","authors":"S. Abd-Elsalam","doi":"10.9734/BMRJ/2016/29869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: This study aimed to identify ascetic fluid bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistance profile in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) patients in Nile delta and its impact on the clinical outcome of these patients. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Patients enrolled in this study were admitted to Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt. Further laboratory work was carried out at Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt, from July 2015 to June 2016. Methodology: 247 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites who met the clinical criteria for Original Research Article Khalil et al.; BMRJ, 17(4): 1-6, 2016; Article no.BMRJ.29869 2 suspicion of SBP including: fever, encephalopathy, refractory ascites and abdominal pain were enrolled in the study. Patients were subjected to thorough history and clinical examination. Ascetic fluid sampling was done for every patient and ascetic fluid analysis was done including cell counts and differential counts. Also, ascitic fluid culture, microbiological testing and antimicrobial sensitivity tests were done. Results: Out of 247 patients enrolled in this study with liver cirrhosis, ascites and clinical suspicion of SBP, 138 patients were excluded. These excluded patients included: 91 patients had ascetic fluid neutrophils below 250 cells/mm3, 4 patients were cases of secondary peritonitis with polymicrobial culture and 43 patients were found to started empirical antibiotics within 5 days of admission. Out of 109 patients who had SBP, 28 only were culture positive. Among culture positive SBP, 16 (57.1%) were Gram positive and 12 (42.9%) were Gram negative. The most common organism isolated was Gram positive Enterococci followed by E. coli and Staph aureus. Conclusion: While Gram negative bacteria were the main infectious agents causing SBP a few decades ago, and are still reported to be so in the most recent recommendations and reviews, Gram positive bacteria are now predominant and there is a rising prevalence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones as regarding this study only and not including previous data or speculations. Current international guidelines recommend the use of a third-generation cephalosporin for empirical treatment of SBP which raise the questions about these guidelines and if they are still valid.","PeriodicalId":9269,"journal":{"name":"British microbiology research journal","volume":"15 4 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British microbiology research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BMRJ/2016/29869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to identify ascetic fluid bacterial pathogens and their antibiotic resistance profile in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP) patients in Nile delta and its impact on the clinical outcome of these patients. Study Design: Retrospective observational study. Place and Duration of Study: Patients enrolled in this study were admitted to Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt. Further laboratory work was carried out at Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Egypt, from July 2015 to June 2016. Methodology: 247 patients with liver cirrhosis and ascites who met the clinical criteria for Original Research Article Khalil et al.; BMRJ, 17(4): 1-6, 2016; Article no.BMRJ.29869 2 suspicion of SBP including: fever, encephalopathy, refractory ascites and abdominal pain were enrolled in the study. Patients were subjected to thorough history and clinical examination. Ascetic fluid sampling was done for every patient and ascetic fluid analysis was done including cell counts and differential counts. Also, ascitic fluid culture, microbiological testing and antimicrobial sensitivity tests were done. Results: Out of 247 patients enrolled in this study with liver cirrhosis, ascites and clinical suspicion of SBP, 138 patients were excluded. These excluded patients included: 91 patients had ascetic fluid neutrophils below 250 cells/mm3, 4 patients were cases of secondary peritonitis with polymicrobial culture and 43 patients were found to started empirical antibiotics within 5 days of admission. Out of 109 patients who had SBP, 28 only were culture positive. Among culture positive SBP, 16 (57.1%) were Gram positive and 12 (42.9%) were Gram negative. The most common organism isolated was Gram positive Enterococci followed by E. coli and Staph aureus. Conclusion: While Gram negative bacteria were the main infectious agents causing SBP a few decades ago, and are still reported to be so in the most recent recommendations and reviews, Gram positive bacteria are now predominant and there is a rising prevalence of bacteria with reduced susceptibility to cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones as regarding this study only and not including previous data or speculations. Current international guidelines recommend the use of a third-generation cephalosporin for empirical treatment of SBP which raise the questions about these guidelines and if they are still valid.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼罗河三角洲自发性细菌性腹膜炎腹水细菌病原体的鉴定及其对患者临床预后的影响
目的:本研究旨在鉴定尼罗河三角洲地区自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)患者的腹水细菌病原体及其抗生素耐药性及其对这些患者临床预后的影响。研究设计:回顾性观察性研究。研究地点和时间:纳入研究的患者来自埃及坦塔大学医学院热带医学和传染病学系。2015年7月至2016年6月,在埃及坦塔大学医学院微生物学和免疫学系开展了进一步的实验室工作。方法:247例符合原研究文章Khalil等临床标准的肝硬化腹水患者;中国生物医学工程学报,17(4):1-6,2016;文章no.BMRJ。29869例怀疑有收缩压的患者包括:发热、脑病、难治性腹水和腹痛纳入研究。对患者进行全面的病史和临床检查。对每位患者进行苦行液取样,并进行苦行液分析,包括细胞计数和鉴别计数。同时进行腹水培养、微生物试验和抗菌药物敏感性试验。结果:在247例肝硬化、腹水和临床怀疑收缩压的患者中,138例患者被排除在外。这些被排除的患者包括:91例患者的腹水中性粒细胞低于250细胞/mm3, 4例患者为继发性腹膜炎合并多微生物培养,43例患者在入院5天内开始使用经验性抗生素。109例收缩压患者中,只有28例培养阳性。其中革兰阳性16例(57.1%),革兰阴性12例(42.9%)。最常见的细菌是革兰氏阳性肠球菌,其次是大肠杆菌和金黄色葡萄球菌。结论:虽然革兰氏阴性菌是几十年前引起SBP的主要感染源,并且在最近的建议和综述中仍然报道如此,但革兰氏阳性菌现在占主导地位,并且仅就本研究而言,不包括先前的数据或推测,革兰氏阳性菌对头孢菌素和氟喹诺酮类药物敏感性降低的细菌患病率上升。目前的国际指南建议使用第三代头孢菌素进行SBP的经导性治疗,这就提出了关于这些指南的问题,以及它们是否仍然有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Isolation and Molecular Detection of Pathogenic Vibrio Species among Economic Fish from Red Sea in Egypt Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Wound Swabs of Patients Attending a Public Hospital in Warri Delta State, Nigeria Role of Three Different Laboratory Tests in Demonstrating Sensitization to Various Allergens in Common Atopic Disorders Molecular Identification, Bioactivity Screening and Metabolic Fingerprinting of the Actinomycetes of Chenab River Sediments Antibacterial Activity of Lactobacillus spp and Lactococcus spp Isolated from Various Parts of Pebbly Fish, Alestes baremoze
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1