Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages

IF 0.5 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Studies in Language Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1075/sl.20055.luk
Ellison Luk, Jean-Christophe Verstraete
{"title":"Conjunctions and clause linkage in Australian languages","authors":"Ellison Luk, Jean-Christophe Verstraete","doi":"10.1075/sl.20055.luk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study analyses the role of conjunctions in clause linkage in Australian languages. Conjunctions are seemingly\n straightforward clause-linking devices, but they remain under-studied, both for Australian languages and from a broader\n typological perspective. In this study, we propose a functional definition of conjunctions, as set against other resources for\n clause linkage. We show that this captures not just the prototypical free-standing elements (the equivalents of if, because, but\n etc.), but also various types of bound markers with a similar function (bound to clause-scoping positions or predicates). We\n survey the role of conjunctions in a representative sample of 53 Australian languages, showing that they are not a marginal clause\n linkage resource in Australia, as seems to be assumed in the relevant literature, but often form a major category within clause\n linkage systems. We also identify a number of areal patterns, based on the size of conjunction inventories and their\n morphosyntactic features.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.20055.luk","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study analyses the role of conjunctions in clause linkage in Australian languages. Conjunctions are seemingly straightforward clause-linking devices, but they remain under-studied, both for Australian languages and from a broader typological perspective. In this study, we propose a functional definition of conjunctions, as set against other resources for clause linkage. We show that this captures not just the prototypical free-standing elements (the equivalents of if, because, but etc.), but also various types of bound markers with a similar function (bound to clause-scoping positions or predicates). We survey the role of conjunctions in a representative sample of 53 Australian languages, showing that they are not a marginal clause linkage resource in Australia, as seems to be assumed in the relevant literature, but often form a major category within clause linkage systems. We also identify a number of areal patterns, based on the size of conjunction inventories and their morphosyntactic features.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚语言中的连词和从句连接
本研究分析了连词在澳大利亚语从句连接中的作用。连词似乎是简单的从句连接手段,但无论是对澳大利亚语言还是从更广泛的类型学角度来看,连词都还没有得到充分的研究。在本研究中,我们提出了连词的功能定义,作为对其他资源的子句连接。我们表明,这不仅捕获了典型的独立元素(相当于if、because、but等),还捕获了具有类似功能的各种类型的绑定标记(绑定到子句作用域位置或谓词)。我们在53种澳大利亚语言的代表性样本中调查了连词的作用,表明它们在澳大利亚并不是一个边缘的从句连接资源,正如相关文献中所假设的那样,而是经常在从句连接系统中形成一个主要类别。我们还根据连接清单的大小及其形态句法特征确定了一些面积模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.
期刊最新文献
‘Until’ constructions and expletive negation in Huasteca Nahuatl On the link between grammaticalization and subjectification The paradigmaticity of evidentials in the Tibetic languages of Khams Evidentiality, discourse prominence and grammaticalization Speaking about knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1