The burden of personal protective equipment and its effect on the work efficiency in health-care workers

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Clinical Sciences Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jcls.jcls_78_22
B. Vaidiyanathan, S. Amalanathan, Satish Chokalingam, Kumaran Alias Ramesh Colbert, Irudhayaraj Joseph, Prathiba Kishore
{"title":"The burden of personal protective equipment and its effect on the work efficiency in health-care workers","authors":"B. Vaidiyanathan, S. Amalanathan, Satish Chokalingam, Kumaran Alias Ramesh Colbert, Irudhayaraj Joseph, Prathiba Kishore","doi":"10.4103/jcls.jcls_78_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Personal protective equipment (PPE) has become a necessity in the COVID pandemic for containing, protecting, and preventing the spread of the virus among the health-care workers; however, there are limitations to its use due to its associated adverse effects. The objective is to determine the adverse effects of PPE and its effect on work efficiency in health-care workers. Methods: This is a single-center descriptive cross-sectional survey done among 384 health-care workers by a consecutive sampling method. A semi-structured questionnaire was sent through the Google platform and the data were analyzed using SPSS 20. Results: 79.7% of study participants reported irritability and 59.9% had difficulty reading and writing during working hours in PPE, both factors had a significant association with their work efficiency (P = 0.019, P = 0.031). A feeling of being in a closed tight environment (85.7%), headache (71.95%), difficulty in drawing samples and intravenous cannulation (60.2%), and difficulty in adjusting the ventilatory settings and infusion pumps (39%) were reported by the study participants. However, these factors did not affect their work efficiency. On multivariate analysis, most health-care workers (HCWs) in the intensive care unit had more adverse effects than the others posted in other clinical areas. Conclusion: Our survey has identified several factors affecting HCWs during their working hours. These physical and cognitive adverse effects need to be alleviated to maintain a healthy, productive, and efficient work environment. We need to encourage reporting and find ways to mitigate their difficulties regarding PPE.","PeriodicalId":15490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Sciences","volume":"26 1","pages":"30 - 34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcls.jcls_78_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Personal protective equipment (PPE) has become a necessity in the COVID pandemic for containing, protecting, and preventing the spread of the virus among the health-care workers; however, there are limitations to its use due to its associated adverse effects. The objective is to determine the adverse effects of PPE and its effect on work efficiency in health-care workers. Methods: This is a single-center descriptive cross-sectional survey done among 384 health-care workers by a consecutive sampling method. A semi-structured questionnaire was sent through the Google platform and the data were analyzed using SPSS 20. Results: 79.7% of study participants reported irritability and 59.9% had difficulty reading and writing during working hours in PPE, both factors had a significant association with their work efficiency (P = 0.019, P = 0.031). A feeling of being in a closed tight environment (85.7%), headache (71.95%), difficulty in drawing samples and intravenous cannulation (60.2%), and difficulty in adjusting the ventilatory settings and infusion pumps (39%) were reported by the study participants. However, these factors did not affect their work efficiency. On multivariate analysis, most health-care workers (HCWs) in the intensive care unit had more adverse effects than the others posted in other clinical areas. Conclusion: Our survey has identified several factors affecting HCWs during their working hours. These physical and cognitive adverse effects need to be alleviated to maintain a healthy, productive, and efficient work environment. We need to encourage reporting and find ways to mitigate their difficulties regarding PPE.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人防护装备负担及其对卫生保健工作者工作效率的影响
在COVID大流行期间,个人防护装备(PPE)已成为遏制、保护和防止病毒在卫生保健工作者中传播的必需品;然而,由于其相关的副作用,它的使用受到限制。目的是确定个人防护装备的不利影响及其对保健工作者工作效率的影响。方法:采用连续抽样方法,对384名卫生保健工作者进行单中心描述性横断面调查。通过Google平台发送半结构化问卷,使用SPSS 20对数据进行分析。结果:79.7%的被试在PPE工作时间表现为易怒,59.9%的被试在PPE工作时间表现为读写困难,两者均与工作效率显著相关(P = 0.019, P = 0.031)。研究参与者报告的主要症状有:感觉身处封闭的密闭环境(85.7%)、头痛(71.95%)、抽取样本和静脉插管困难(60.2%)、调节通气设置和输液泵困难(39%)。然而,这些因素并没有影响他们的工作效率。在多变量分析中,重症监护病房的大多数卫生保健工作者(HCWs)比其他临床领域的其他卫生保健工作者有更多的不良反应。结论:我们的调查确定了影响医护人员工作时间的几个因素。需要减轻这些身体和认知上的不利影响,以保持一个健康、富有成效和高效的工作环境。我们需要鼓励报告,并设法减轻他们在个人防护装备方面的困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Sciences
Journal of Clinical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
45 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum: Fall risks and health-related quality of life among elderly attending primary healthcare centers in South Western Nigeria: A cross-sectional study Intensive care management of sniper (organophosphate) poisoning secondary to deliberate self-harm: A case report The Journal of Clinical Sciences: From humble beginnings to a dissemination force of scientific research Comparison of Alvarado score, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis score, and ultrasonography for diagnosing acute appendicitis: A prospective study Neck circumference and cardiometabolic syndrome in adult patients at a tertiary hospital in Lagos, Nigeria: A cross-sectional study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1