{"title":"Differentiation between Pleural Mesothelioma versus Pseudo-Mesothelioma Demonstrated in Eight Autopsy Cases","authors":"J. Fries, M. Saleh, R. Büttner","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pleural lobes are the origin of different pathologies, including malignant tumors, e.g., pleural \nmesothelioma. In some cases, clinical and macroscopic presentation point strongly to the diagnosis but often \nenough the patient has another underlying disease; malignant neoplasms of the lung as well as other organs \n(skin, pancreas, prostate or kidney) can mimic pleural mesothelioma and if so, are defined as ‘pseudo-mesothelioma’. We present eight cases that are clinically and macroscopically highly suspicious for pleural \nmesothelioma. All patients were autopsied due to medico-legal issues and work-related diseases. Six out of \neight patients underwent autopsy to exclude possibility of asbestos-related malignancy and two out of eight \ndue to exclusion of silicosis. From the eight cases, only three were real pleural mesotheliomas. Another \nthree were adenocarcinomas of the lung mimicking pleural mesotheliomas. One had squamous cell \ncarcinoma of the lung. Lastly, one patient had an extraordinary case of papillary renal cell carcinoma \nmetastasizing universally in both pleura lobes. Due to striking morphological similarities, the exact final \ndiagnosis was only possible after extended immunohistochemical analysis of the tissues. In summary, not \nonly is it difficult to distinguish between real or pseudo pleural mesothelioma in patients having had contact \nwith asbestos. Even patients with no evidence of asbestos contact can have clinical and pathological events \nstrongly suggesting asbestosis and mesothelioma, without having it.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.08.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The pleural lobes are the origin of different pathologies, including malignant tumors, e.g., pleural
mesothelioma. In some cases, clinical and macroscopic presentation point strongly to the diagnosis but often
enough the patient has another underlying disease; malignant neoplasms of the lung as well as other organs
(skin, pancreas, prostate or kidney) can mimic pleural mesothelioma and if so, are defined as ‘pseudo-mesothelioma’. We present eight cases that are clinically and macroscopically highly suspicious for pleural
mesothelioma. All patients were autopsied due to medico-legal issues and work-related diseases. Six out of
eight patients underwent autopsy to exclude possibility of asbestos-related malignancy and two out of eight
due to exclusion of silicosis. From the eight cases, only three were real pleural mesotheliomas. Another
three were adenocarcinomas of the lung mimicking pleural mesotheliomas. One had squamous cell
carcinoma of the lung. Lastly, one patient had an extraordinary case of papillary renal cell carcinoma
metastasizing universally in both pleura lobes. Due to striking morphological similarities, the exact final
diagnosis was only possible after extended immunohistochemical analysis of the tissues. In summary, not
only is it difficult to distinguish between real or pseudo pleural mesothelioma in patients having had contact
with asbestos. Even patients with no evidence of asbestos contact can have clinical and pathological events
strongly suggesting asbestosis and mesothelioma, without having it.