Embryo Toxicity and Teratogenicity of Formaldehyde

J. D. Thrasher, K. Kilburn
{"title":"Embryo Toxicity and Teratogenicity of Formaldehyde","authors":"J. D. Thrasher, K. Kilburn","doi":"10.1080/00039890109604460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract C-14 formaldehyde crosses the placenta and enters fetal tissues. The incorporated radioactivity is higher in fetal organs (i.e., brain and liver) than in maternal tissues. The incorporation mechanism has not been studied fully, but formaldehyde enters the single-carbon cycle and is incorporated as a methyl group into nucleic acids and proteins. Also, formaldehyde reacts chemically with organic compounds (e.g., deoxyribonucleic acid, nucleosides, nucleotides, proteins, amino acids) by addition and condensation reactions, thus forming adducts and deoxyribonucleic acid-protein crosslinks. The following questions must be addressed: What adducts (e.g., N-methyl amino acids) are formed in the blood following formaldehyde inhalation? What role do N-methyl-amino adducts play in alkylation of nuclear and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, as well as mitochondrial peroxidation? The fact that the free formaldehyde pool in blood is not affected following exposure to the chemical does not mean that formaldehyde is not involved in altering cell and deoxyribonucleic acid characteristics beyond the nasal cavity. The teratogenic effect of formaldehyde in the English literature has been sought, beginning on the 6th day of pregnancy (i.e., rodents) (Saillenfait AM, et al. Food Chem Toxicol 1989, pp 545–48; Martin WJ. Reprod Toxicol 1990, pp 237–39; Ulsamer AC, et al. Hazard Assessment of Chemicals; Academic Press, 1984, pp 337–400; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Toxicological Profile of Formaldehyde; ATSDR, 1999 [references 1–4, respectively, herein]). The exposure regimen is critical and may account for the differences in outcomes. Pregnant rats were exposed (a) prior to mating, (b) during mating, (c) or during the entire gestation period. These regimens (a) increased embryo mortality; (b) increased fetal anomalies (i.e., cryptochordism and aberrant ossification centers); (c) decreased concentrations of ascorbic acid; and (d) caused abnormalities in enzymes of mitochondria, lysosomes, and the endoplasmic reticulum. The alterations in enzymatic activity persisted 4 mo following birth. In addition, formaldehyde caused metabolic acidosis, which was augmented by iron deficiency. Furthermore, newborns exposed to formaldehyde in utero had abnormal performances in open-field tests. Disparities in teratogenic effects of toxic chemicals are not unusual. For example, chlorpyrifos has not produced teratogenic effects in rats when mothers are exposed on days 6–15 (Katakura Y, et al. Br J Ind Med 1993, pp 176–82 [reference 5 herein]) of gestation (Breslin WJ, et al. Fund Appl Toxicol 1996, pp 119–30; and Hartley TR, et al. Toxicol Sci 2000, pp 100–08 [references 6 and 7, respectively, herein]). However, either changing the endpoints for measurement or exposing neonates during periods of neurogenesis (days 1–14 following birth) and during subsequent developmental periods produced adverse effects. These effects included neuroapoptosis, decreased deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid synthesis, abnormalities in adenylyl cyclase cascade, and neurobehavioral effects (Johnson DE, et al. Brain Res Bull 1998, pp 143–47; Lassiter TL, et al. Toxicol Sci 1999, pp 92–100; Chakraborti TK, et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1993, pp 219–24; Whitney KD, et al. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1995, pp 53–62; Chanda SM, et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1996, pp 771–76; Dam K, et al. Devel Brain Res 1998, pp 39–45; Campbell CG, et al. Brain Res Bull 1997, pp 179–89; and Xong X, et al. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1997, pp 158–74 [references 8–15, respectively, herein]). Furthermore, the terata caused by thalidomide is a graphic human example in which the animal model and timing of exposure were key factors (Parman T, et al. Natl Med 1999, pp 582–85; and Brenner CA, et al. Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887–92 [references 16 and 17, respectively, herein]). Thus, it appears that more sensitive endpoints (e.g., enzyme activity, generation of reactive oxygen species, timing of exposure) for the measurement of toxic effects of environmental agents on embryos, fetuses, and neonates are more coherent than are gross terata observations. The perinatal period from the end of organogenesis to the end of the neonatal period in humans approximates the 28th day of gestation to 4 wk postpartum. Therefore, researchers must investigate similar stages of development (e.g., neurogenesis occurs in the 3rd trimester in humans and neonatal days occur during days 1–14 in rats and mice, whereas guinea pigs behave more like humans). Finally, screening for teratogenic events should also include exposure of females before mating or shortly following mating. Such a regimen is fruitful inasmuch as environmental agents cause adverse effects on ovarian elements (e.g., thecal cells and ova [nuclear-deoxyribonucleic acid and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid]), as well as on zygotes and embryos before implantation. Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid mutations and deletions occur in human oocytes and embryos (Parman T, et al. Natl Med 1999, pp 582–85; and Brenner CA, et al. Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887–92 [references 16 and 17, respectively, herein]). Thus, it is likely that xenobiotics directly affect n-deoxyribonucleic acid and/or mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid in either the ovum or the zygote/embryo or both (Thrasher JD. Arch Environ Health 2000, pp 292–94 [reference 18 herein]), and they could account for the increasing appearance of a variety of mitochondrial diseases, including autism (Lomard L. Med Hypotheses 1998, pp 497–99; Wallace EC. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1994, pp 8730–46; and Giles RE, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1980, pp 6715–19 [references 19–21, respectively, herein]). Two cases of human birth defects were reported in formaldehyde-contaminated homes (Woodbury MA, et al. Formaldehyde Toxicity 1983; pp 203–11 [reference 22 herein]). One case was anencephalic at 2.76 ppm, and the other defect at 0.54 ppm was not characterized. Further observations on human birth defects are recommended.","PeriodicalId":8276,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal","volume":"14 1","pages":"300 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"111","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental Health: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00039890109604460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 111

Abstract

Abstract C-14 formaldehyde crosses the placenta and enters fetal tissues. The incorporated radioactivity is higher in fetal organs (i.e., brain and liver) than in maternal tissues. The incorporation mechanism has not been studied fully, but formaldehyde enters the single-carbon cycle and is incorporated as a methyl group into nucleic acids and proteins. Also, formaldehyde reacts chemically with organic compounds (e.g., deoxyribonucleic acid, nucleosides, nucleotides, proteins, amino acids) by addition and condensation reactions, thus forming adducts and deoxyribonucleic acid-protein crosslinks. The following questions must be addressed: What adducts (e.g., N-methyl amino acids) are formed in the blood following formaldehyde inhalation? What role do N-methyl-amino adducts play in alkylation of nuclear and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid, as well as mitochondrial peroxidation? The fact that the free formaldehyde pool in blood is not affected following exposure to the chemical does not mean that formaldehyde is not involved in altering cell and deoxyribonucleic acid characteristics beyond the nasal cavity. The teratogenic effect of formaldehyde in the English literature has been sought, beginning on the 6th day of pregnancy (i.e., rodents) (Saillenfait AM, et al. Food Chem Toxicol 1989, pp 545–48; Martin WJ. Reprod Toxicol 1990, pp 237–39; Ulsamer AC, et al. Hazard Assessment of Chemicals; Academic Press, 1984, pp 337–400; and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Toxicological Profile of Formaldehyde; ATSDR, 1999 [references 1–4, respectively, herein]). The exposure regimen is critical and may account for the differences in outcomes. Pregnant rats were exposed (a) prior to mating, (b) during mating, (c) or during the entire gestation period. These regimens (a) increased embryo mortality; (b) increased fetal anomalies (i.e., cryptochordism and aberrant ossification centers); (c) decreased concentrations of ascorbic acid; and (d) caused abnormalities in enzymes of mitochondria, lysosomes, and the endoplasmic reticulum. The alterations in enzymatic activity persisted 4 mo following birth. In addition, formaldehyde caused metabolic acidosis, which was augmented by iron deficiency. Furthermore, newborns exposed to formaldehyde in utero had abnormal performances in open-field tests. Disparities in teratogenic effects of toxic chemicals are not unusual. For example, chlorpyrifos has not produced teratogenic effects in rats when mothers are exposed on days 6–15 (Katakura Y, et al. Br J Ind Med 1993, pp 176–82 [reference 5 herein]) of gestation (Breslin WJ, et al. Fund Appl Toxicol 1996, pp 119–30; and Hartley TR, et al. Toxicol Sci 2000, pp 100–08 [references 6 and 7, respectively, herein]). However, either changing the endpoints for measurement or exposing neonates during periods of neurogenesis (days 1–14 following birth) and during subsequent developmental periods produced adverse effects. These effects included neuroapoptosis, decreased deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid synthesis, abnormalities in adenylyl cyclase cascade, and neurobehavioral effects (Johnson DE, et al. Brain Res Bull 1998, pp 143–47; Lassiter TL, et al. Toxicol Sci 1999, pp 92–100; Chakraborti TK, et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1993, pp 219–24; Whitney KD, et al. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1995, pp 53–62; Chanda SM, et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1996, pp 771–76; Dam K, et al. Devel Brain Res 1998, pp 39–45; Campbell CG, et al. Brain Res Bull 1997, pp 179–89; and Xong X, et al. Toxicol Appl Pharm 1997, pp 158–74 [references 8–15, respectively, herein]). Furthermore, the terata caused by thalidomide is a graphic human example in which the animal model and timing of exposure were key factors (Parman T, et al. Natl Med 1999, pp 582–85; and Brenner CA, et al. Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887–92 [references 16 and 17, respectively, herein]). Thus, it appears that more sensitive endpoints (e.g., enzyme activity, generation of reactive oxygen species, timing of exposure) for the measurement of toxic effects of environmental agents on embryos, fetuses, and neonates are more coherent than are gross terata observations. The perinatal period from the end of organogenesis to the end of the neonatal period in humans approximates the 28th day of gestation to 4 wk postpartum. Therefore, researchers must investigate similar stages of development (e.g., neurogenesis occurs in the 3rd trimester in humans and neonatal days occur during days 1–14 in rats and mice, whereas guinea pigs behave more like humans). Finally, screening for teratogenic events should also include exposure of females before mating or shortly following mating. Such a regimen is fruitful inasmuch as environmental agents cause adverse effects on ovarian elements (e.g., thecal cells and ova [nuclear-deoxyribonucleic acid and mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid]), as well as on zygotes and embryos before implantation. Mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid mutations and deletions occur in human oocytes and embryos (Parman T, et al. Natl Med 1999, pp 582–85; and Brenner CA, et al. Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887–92 [references 16 and 17, respectively, herein]). Thus, it is likely that xenobiotics directly affect n-deoxyribonucleic acid and/or mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid in either the ovum or the zygote/embryo or both (Thrasher JD. Arch Environ Health 2000, pp 292–94 [reference 18 herein]), and they could account for the increasing appearance of a variety of mitochondrial diseases, including autism (Lomard L. Med Hypotheses 1998, pp 497–99; Wallace EC. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1994, pp 8730–46; and Giles RE, et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1980, pp 6715–19 [references 19–21, respectively, herein]). Two cases of human birth defects were reported in formaldehyde-contaminated homes (Woodbury MA, et al. Formaldehyde Toxicity 1983; pp 203–11 [reference 22 herein]). One case was anencephalic at 2.76 ppm, and the other defect at 0.54 ppm was not characterized. Further observations on human birth defects are recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲醛的胚胎毒性和致畸性
C-14甲醛通过胎盘进入胎儿组织。胎儿器官(即大脑和肝脏)中的放射性掺入比母体组织中的放射性要高。甲醛的掺入机理尚未得到充分的研究,但甲醛进入单碳循环,以甲基的形式掺入核酸和蛋白质中。此外,甲醛通过加成和缩合反应与有机化合物(如脱氧核糖核酸、核苷、核苷酸、蛋白质、氨基酸)发生化学反应,从而形成加合物和脱氧核糖核酸-蛋白质交联。必须解决以下问题:吸入甲醛后血液中会形成什么加合物(如n -甲基氨基酸)?n -甲基氨基加合物在细胞核和线粒体脱氧核糖核酸的烷基化以及线粒体过氧化反应中起什么作用?暴露于这种化学物质后,血液中的游离甲醛池不受影响,这一事实并不意味着甲醛不参与改变鼻腔以外的细胞和脱氧核糖核酸特征。在英国文献中,甲醛的致畸作用已被寻求,从怀孕第6天开始(即啮齿动物)(Saillenfait AM, et al.)。食品化学毒理学1989,pp 545-48;马丁WJ。生殖毒物,1990,pp 237-39;Ulsamer AC等。化学品危害评估;学术出版社,1984年,337-400页;以及美国卫生与公众服务部甲醛的毒理学概况;ATSDR, 1999[分别参考文献1-4])。暴露方案至关重要,可能是导致结果差异的原因。妊娠大鼠分别在(a)交配前、(b)交配中、(c)或整个妊娠期暴露。这些方案(a)增加胚胎死亡率;(b)胎儿异常增加(即隐索畸形和异常骨化中心);(c)抗坏血酸浓度降低;(d)引起线粒体、溶酶体和内质网酶的异常。酶活性的改变在出生后4个月仍然存在。此外,甲醛引起代谢性酸中毒,并因缺铁而加重。此外,在子宫内暴露于甲醛的新生儿在露天测试中表现异常。有毒化学物质致畸作用的差异并不罕见。例如,当母鼠在第6-15天接触毒死蜱时,毒死蜱不会对大鼠产生致畸作用(Katakura Y等)。Br J Ind Med, 1993, pp 176-82[文献5])妊娠(Breslin WJ, et。基金苹果毒理学1996,pp 119-30;Hartley TR等。毒物科学2000,第100-08页[分别参考文献6和7])。然而,无论是改变测量终点,还是在新生儿神经发生期间(出生后1-14天)和随后的发育期间暴露,都会产生不良影响。这些影响包括神经细胞凋亡、脱氧核糖核酸和核糖核酸合成减少、腺苷酸环化酶级联异常以及神经行为影响(Johnson DE等)。Brain Res, 1998, pp 143-47;Lassiter TL,等。毒物科学1999,pp 92-100;Chakraborti TK等。生物化学学报1993,pp 219-24;惠特尼·KD,等。苹果制药1995,pp 53-62;Chanda SM,等。药物生物化学行为1996,pp 771-76;Dam K,等。Devel Brain Res 1998, pp 39-45;坎贝尔等人。Brain Res Bull 1997, pp 179-89;熊鑫,等。毒理学杂志,苹果制药,第158-74页[参考文献8-15])。此外,沙利度胺引起的早产是一个生动的人类例子,其中动物模型和暴露时间是关键因素(Parman T等)。国家医学1999,582-85页;Brenner CA等。Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887-92[分别参考文献16和17])。因此,在测量环境因素对胚胎、胎儿和新生儿的毒性作用时,更敏感的终点(如酶活性、活性氧的产生、暴露时间)似乎比总的terata观察结果更连贯。围产期从人体器官发生结束到新生儿期结束,大约为妊娠第28天至产后4周。因此,研究人员必须研究相似的发育阶段(例如,人类的神经发生在妊娠晚期,大鼠和小鼠的新生期发生在第1-14天,而豚鼠的行为更像人类)。最后,筛查致畸事件还应包括雌性在交配前或交配后不久的暴露。这种方案是卓有成效的,因为环境因素会对卵巢元素(例如,鞘细胞和卵子[核脱氧核糖核酸和线粒体脱氧核糖核酸])以及着床前的受精卵和胚胎产生不利影响。 线粒体脱氧核糖核酸突变和缺失发生在人类卵母细胞和胚胎(Parman T, et al.)。国家医学1999,582-85页;Brenner CA等。Mol Human Repro 1998, pp 887-92[分别参考文献16和17])。因此,外源药物很可能直接影响卵子或受精卵/胚胎或两者中的n-脱氧核糖核酸和/或线粒体脱氧核糖核酸(Thrasher JD)。Arch Environ Health, 2000年,第292-94页[此处参考文献18]),它们可以解释包括自闭症在内的各种线粒体疾病越来越多的出现(Lomard L. Med hypothesis, 1998年,第497-99页;华莱士EC。国家科学进展1994,pp 8730-46;和Giles RE等。《国家科学学报》1980,pp 6715-19[参考文献19-21])。在甲醛污染的家庭中报告了两例人类出生缺陷(Woodbury MA等)。甲醛毒性1983;第203-11页[参考文献22])。一个病例是无脑在2.76 ppm,而另一个缺陷在0.54 ppm没有表征。建议进一步观察人类出生缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Index to Volume 59 Mold Conference Objectives and Summary Diisocyanates and Nonoccupational Disease: A Review Index to volume 57 The Archives—a New Beginning Every Month
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1