Explaining the Components of Reflective Thinking Based on Fuzzy Topsis Analysis

F. Moradi, L. Mousavi, S. Hosseini
{"title":"Explaining the Components of Reflective Thinking Based on Fuzzy Topsis Analysis","authors":"F. Moradi, L. Mousavi, S. Hosseini","doi":"10.53656/str2022-2-6-exp","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reflective thinking paradigm contains a set of trainings based on the pattern of mental tools and it helps its users to be able to present the educational materials in a framework that embraces the nature of thinking, various learning activities and the learning based on reflective, creative and critical forms of thinking. Reviewing of the related literature shows that most of the challenges are due to learning and learning-related factors. Accordingly, the present study examines the thinking level of senior postgraduate engineering students of Shahre- Rey University. For this purpose, the Reflective Thinking Questionnaire (RTQ) developed by Kember et al. (2000) was used. TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the thinking level of the subjects. The results showed that habitual action, which is one of the skills of reflective thinking, is ranked first and perception is ranked last, which means that the senior postgraduate engineering students learn superficially. It is suggested to ask professors and teachers to hold classes that train reflective thinking skills, so that they can be a good and appropriate model of using reflective thinking skills for their students. So that students can improve their thinking levels and succeed in their math problems solving and these learners have good academic progress.","PeriodicalId":40820,"journal":{"name":"Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies for Policy in Science and Education-Strategii na Obrazovatelnata i Nauchnata Politika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/str2022-2-6-exp","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reflective thinking paradigm contains a set of trainings based on the pattern of mental tools and it helps its users to be able to present the educational materials in a framework that embraces the nature of thinking, various learning activities and the learning based on reflective, creative and critical forms of thinking. Reviewing of the related literature shows that most of the challenges are due to learning and learning-related factors. Accordingly, the present study examines the thinking level of senior postgraduate engineering students of Shahre- Rey University. For this purpose, the Reflective Thinking Questionnaire (RTQ) developed by Kember et al. (2000) was used. TOPSIS method was used to evaluate the thinking level of the subjects. The results showed that habitual action, which is one of the skills of reflective thinking, is ranked first and perception is ranked last, which means that the senior postgraduate engineering students learn superficially. It is suggested to ask professors and teachers to hold classes that train reflective thinking skills, so that they can be a good and appropriate model of using reflective thinking skills for their students. So that students can improve their thinking levels and succeed in their math problems solving and these learners have good academic progress.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模糊Topsis分析法解释反思性思维的构成要素
反思性思维范式包含了一套基于思维工具模式的训练,它帮助使用者能够在一个包含思维本质、各种学习活动以及基于反思性、创造性和批判性思维形式的学习的框架中呈现教材。回顾相关文献表明,大多数挑战是由于学习和与学习相关的因素。因此,本研究考察了沙雷伊大学工程专业高年级研究生的思维水平。为此,我们使用了Kember等人(2000)开发的反思性思维问卷(RTQ)。采用TOPSIS法评价被试的思维水平。结果表明,作为反思性思维技能之一的习惯动作排名第一,感知排名最后,说明工科研究生的学习比较肤浅。建议要求教授和老师开设训练反思性思维技能的课程,这样他们就可以成为学生使用反思性思维技能的良好和适当的模式。从而提高学生的思维水平,成功地解决数学问题,这些学习者有良好的学业进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Football Fans Antisocial Acts during The First League Matches in Season 2022/2023 and Bulgarian Football Union’s Sanctions A Model for Healthy and Safe Taekwondo Training Training in Walking with Aids – Risks and Safety for the Patient Online Fitness Training and Cybersecurity: Potential Threats and Prevention Types of Injuries in Parachutism and Their Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1