Evaluation of Nitrate Reductase Assay For Rapid Detection of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis

Ranjit Kumar Sah, Dwij Raj Bhatta, Gokarna Raj Ghimire, Bhuwaneswor Prasad Kandel, Bishnu Raj Tiwari, Jeevan Bahadur Sherchand
{"title":"Evaluation of Nitrate Reductase Assay For Rapid Detection of Drug Resistant Tuberculosis","authors":"Ranjit Kumar Sah, Dwij Raj Bhatta, Gokarna Raj Ghimire, Bhuwaneswor Prasad Kandel, Bishnu Raj Tiwari, Jeevan Bahadur Sherchand","doi":"10.37107/jhas.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) urgently demands for simple, rapid and inexpensive methods of its detection for the effective treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis, particularly in low-income countries. This prospective study was carried out at National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory and South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Centre, Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal, from November 2009 to May 2010 to evaluate nitrate reductase assay (NRA) efficacy for rapid determination of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. A total of 113 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were tested for four first line antitubercular drugs by nitrate reductase assay and were compared with standard proportion method. Results were available in 7-14 days by NRA as compared to proportion method which generally takes 4-6 weeks. The sensitivity and specificity of NRA were 98.1% and 100% for isoniazid, 95.1% and 98.6% for rifampicin, 91.4% and 94.9% for streptomycin, and 78.6% and 97.9% for ethambutol respectively. Agreement between NRA and proportion method were 99.1%, 97.3%, 93.8%, 95.6% for isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin and ethambutol, respectively. NRA is easier, inexpensive and reliable method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterum tuberculosis for isoniazid and rifampicin, the two most important drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. The reduction in susceptibility testing time, and higher sensitivity and specificity of NRA method is of fundamental importance in detecting MDR-TB. \nKey words: Drug susceptibility, MDR-TB, NRA, proportion method","PeriodicalId":39573,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","volume":"279 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37107/jhas.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) urgently demands for simple, rapid and inexpensive methods of its detection for the effective treatment of drug resistant tuberculosis, particularly in low-income countries. This prospective study was carried out at National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory and South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation (SAARC) Tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS Centre, Thimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal, from November 2009 to May 2010 to evaluate nitrate reductase assay (NRA) efficacy for rapid determination of streptomycin, isoniazid, rifampicin and ethambutol susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. A total of 113 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis were tested for four first line antitubercular drugs by nitrate reductase assay and were compared with standard proportion method. Results were available in 7-14 days by NRA as compared to proportion method which generally takes 4-6 weeks. The sensitivity and specificity of NRA were 98.1% and 100% for isoniazid, 95.1% and 98.6% for rifampicin, 91.4% and 94.9% for streptomycin, and 78.6% and 97.9% for ethambutol respectively. Agreement between NRA and proportion method were 99.1%, 97.3%, 93.8%, 95.6% for isoniazid, rifampicin, streptomycin and ethambutol, respectively. NRA is easier, inexpensive and reliable method for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterum tuberculosis for isoniazid and rifampicin, the two most important drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis. The reduction in susceptibility testing time, and higher sensitivity and specificity of NRA method is of fundamental importance in detecting MDR-TB. Key words: Drug susceptibility, MDR-TB, NRA, proportion method
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
硝酸还原酶法快速检测耐药结核病的评价
耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的出现迫切需要简单、快速和廉价的检测方法,以便有效治疗耐药结核病,特别是在低收入国家。本前瞻性研究于2009年11月至2010年5月在尼泊尔巴克塔普尔Thimi的国家结核病参考实验室和南亚区域合作联盟结核病和艾滋病毒/艾滋病中心开展,目的是评价硝酸还原酶测定法(NRA)快速测定结核分枝杆菌菌株链霉素、异烟肼、利福平和乙胺丁醇敏感性的有效性。采用硝酸还原酶法对113株临床分离的结核分枝杆菌进行4种一线抗结核药物的检测,并与标准比例法进行比较。与比例法一般需要4-6周的时间相比,NRA法在7-14天内可得到结果。NRA对异烟肼、利福平、链霉素、乙胺丁醇的敏感性和特异性分别为98.1%和100%、95.1%和98.6%、91.4%和94.9%、78.6%和97.9%。异烟肼、利福平、链霉素和乙胺丁醇的NRA与比例法的符合率分别为99.1%、97.3%、93.8%和95.6%。NRA是结核分枝杆菌对治疗结核病的两种最重要药物异烟肼和利福平进行药敏试验的一种简便、廉价和可靠的方法。NRA法药敏试验时间的缩短、灵敏度和特异性的提高对耐多药结核病的检测具有重要意义。关键词:药敏,耐多药结核病,NRA,比例法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Online Journal of Health & Allied Sciences is the FIRST "Online Only" medical journal from India. The journal brings the vast potential of the Internet to the doorsteps of the biomedical fraternity for publishing various topics of common interest.
期刊最新文献
Current and Future Growing demand of Digital Health Technologies to care Dementia and Elderly during Pandemic Dietary Consumption Practices and Its Associated Factors among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Pokhara Metropolitan Need and Important of Implementation Research in Nepal Prevalence and Effects of Dysmenorrhea on Academic Performance among Secondary School Girls in Pokhara Metropolitan, Kaski Fecal Carriage of Multi-drug Resistant Escherichia coli in Healthy Children: a Community-based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1