Bacteriology of wound infections and Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Isolates

V. N., Ashli Raj V, Nisharani Ss, Li Al, Chandini S, S. R
{"title":"Bacteriology of wound infections and Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the Isolates","authors":"V. N., Ashli Raj V, Nisharani Ss, Li Al, Chandini S, S. R","doi":"10.52711/2321-5836.2021.00017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wound infection has always been a major complication of surgery and trauma. The aim of our study was to determine the bacteriology of wound infections and to study the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates. The study was conducted in tertiary care hospital, Erode. The design of the study was a prospective type. Pus swabs / specimens were collected from hospitalized patients who developed wound infections. Bacterial pathogens were identified by conventional biochemical methods according to standard microbiological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on Muller – Hinton agar by the standard disk diffusion method. The incidence of wound infection was more common in males (63%) than in females (37%). Out of 100 culture positive samples, 61 samples were collected from diabetic ulcer patients, 20 samples were from ulcer patients, and 19 samples were from post operative patients. Of the 100 samples (culture positive), 71% collected samples showed mono-microbial growth, 29% showed two type of microbial growth. The prevalence of S. aureus (62.87%) from different wound infections was found to be high, followed by E.coli (48.65%), Klebsiella (30.21%), Pseudomonas (22.16%). Organisms showed diversity in the sensitivity pattern towards the antibiotics tested. High level of sensitivity was observed to Imipenem, Piperacillin tazobactum and Amikacin. High level of resistance was observed to Cephalosporins and Penicillin derivatives. We concluded that the sensitivity pattern of the antibiotics is not based on the infection site but on the type of organisms. This study gives us an insight to the current state of causative pathogens and their sensitivity to different antibiotics used in tertiary care hospital, Erode. The data of this study may be used to determine trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities and to modify antibiotic policy of the Hospital.","PeriodicalId":20945,"journal":{"name":"Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5836.2021.00017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wound infection has always been a major complication of surgery and trauma. The aim of our study was to determine the bacteriology of wound infections and to study the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates. The study was conducted in tertiary care hospital, Erode. The design of the study was a prospective type. Pus swabs / specimens were collected from hospitalized patients who developed wound infections. Bacterial pathogens were identified by conventional biochemical methods according to standard microbiological techniques. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed on Muller – Hinton agar by the standard disk diffusion method. The incidence of wound infection was more common in males (63%) than in females (37%). Out of 100 culture positive samples, 61 samples were collected from diabetic ulcer patients, 20 samples were from ulcer patients, and 19 samples were from post operative patients. Of the 100 samples (culture positive), 71% collected samples showed mono-microbial growth, 29% showed two type of microbial growth. The prevalence of S. aureus (62.87%) from different wound infections was found to be high, followed by E.coli (48.65%), Klebsiella (30.21%), Pseudomonas (22.16%). Organisms showed diversity in the sensitivity pattern towards the antibiotics tested. High level of sensitivity was observed to Imipenem, Piperacillin tazobactum and Amikacin. High level of resistance was observed to Cephalosporins and Penicillin derivatives. We concluded that the sensitivity pattern of the antibiotics is not based on the infection site but on the type of organisms. This study gives us an insight to the current state of causative pathogens and their sensitivity to different antibiotics used in tertiary care hospital, Erode. The data of this study may be used to determine trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities and to modify antibiotic policy of the Hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伤口感染的细菌学及分离株的抗生素敏感性
伤口感染一直是外科手术和创伤的主要并发症。本研究的目的是确定伤口感染的细菌学,并研究分离株的抗生素敏感性模式。这项研究是在罗德三级护理医院进行的。本研究设计为前瞻性研究。从发生伤口感染的住院患者收集脓拭子/标本。根据标准微生物学技术,采用常规生化方法对病原菌进行鉴定。采用标准圆盘扩散法对Muller - Hinton琼脂进行药敏试验。伤口感染的发生率男性(63%)高于女性(37%)。100份培养阳性样本中,61份来自糖尿病溃疡患者,20份来自溃疡患者,19份来自手术后患者。在100份样本(培养阳性)中,71%的样本显示单一微生物生长,29%的样本显示两种微生物生长。不同伤口感染中金黄色葡萄球菌感染率最高(62.87%),其次是大肠杆菌(48.65%)、克雷伯菌(30.21%)、假单胞菌(22.16%)。微生物对所测抗生素的敏感性表现出多样性。对亚胺培南、哌拉西林、他唑巴坦和阿米卡星均有较高的敏感性。观察到对头孢菌素和青霉素衍生物的高度耐药。我们得出结论,抗生素的敏感性模式不是基于感染部位,而是基于生物体的类型。这项研究让我们了解到目前的状态的致病病原体和他们的敏感性对不同的抗生素使用三级护理医院,侵蚀。本研究的数据可用于确定抗菌药物敏感性的趋势和修改医院的抗生素政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Facing the Challenge: Hormonal hurdles, Olfaction Obstacles in Kallmann Syndrome A Comprehensive Guide to Paget’s Disease of Bone A Review on Rett Syndrome: A Debilitating Neurodevelopmental Disorder Lumpy Skin Disease, an Emerging Transboundary Viral Disease in Animal’s: A Review Wolfram Syndrome: A Rare Genetic disorder affecting Multiple Organ Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1