Correlation between clinical symptomatology and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of COVID-19: An analysis using routine data in Burkina Faso

H. Ouédraogo, Pascal Nabia, K. Cissé, O. Ouédraogo, A. Zouré, Danielle Belemsaga Yugbare, Sylvie Zida, E. Diendéré, T. Sagna
{"title":"Correlation between clinical symptomatology and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of COVID-19: An analysis using routine data in Burkina Faso","authors":"H. Ouédraogo, Pascal Nabia, K. Cissé, O. Ouédraogo, A. Zouré, Danielle Belemsaga Yugbare, Sylvie Zida, E. Diendéré, T. Sagna","doi":"10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2023.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between suspected COVID-19 symptoms and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Burkina Faso. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR routine diagnostic data in Burkina Faso. Data were collected from March 9, 2020 to September 30, 2020 in the framework of the COVID-19 surveillance. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and Kappa concordance were used to check the correlation between COVID-19 symptoms and the RT-PCR results. A total of 2217 participants were tested for COVID-19 using RT-PCR, of them 779 COVID-19 positive. The mean age of the participants was 38.7± 17.69 years. Suspected symptoms presented by participants were fever (40.4%), cough (38.6%), asthenia (27.3%), headache (23.6%), dyspnea (20.8%), and odynophagia (16.3%). The sensitivity of presence of at least a clinical sign compared to RT-PCR results was 62.13% and the specificity was 39.85%. The kappa agreement between the presence of COVID-19 suspected symptoms and RT-PCR results was 0.017. The presence of aguesia and/or anosmia in patients induced a positive predictive value of RT-PCR of 91.30%. : The correlation between the COVID-19 symptoms and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was very weak. The present study confirms that most clinical signs associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not specific to COVID-19, hence the need to always combine RT-PCR or other biological tests with the clinical diagnosis. However, aguesia and anosmia are of interest with a high degree of RT-PCR positivity when present in a COVID-19 suspected patient.","PeriodicalId":14553,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Medical Microbiology and Tropical Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijmmtd.2023.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between suspected COVID-19 symptoms and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection in Burkina Faso. We analyzed SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR routine diagnostic data in Burkina Faso. Data were collected from March 9, 2020 to September 30, 2020 in the framework of the COVID-19 surveillance. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and Kappa concordance were used to check the correlation between COVID-19 symptoms and the RT-PCR results. A total of 2217 participants were tested for COVID-19 using RT-PCR, of them 779 COVID-19 positive. The mean age of the participants was 38.7± 17.69 years. Suspected symptoms presented by participants were fever (40.4%), cough (38.6%), asthenia (27.3%), headache (23.6%), dyspnea (20.8%), and odynophagia (16.3%). The sensitivity of presence of at least a clinical sign compared to RT-PCR results was 62.13% and the specificity was 39.85%. The kappa agreement between the presence of COVID-19 suspected symptoms and RT-PCR results was 0.017. The presence of aguesia and/or anosmia in patients induced a positive predictive value of RT-PCR of 91.30%. : The correlation between the COVID-19 symptoms and RT-PCR results in the diagnosis of COVID-19 was very weak. The present study confirms that most clinical signs associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection are not specific to COVID-19, hence the need to always combine RT-PCR or other biological tests with the clinical diagnosis. However, aguesia and anosmia are of interest with a high degree of RT-PCR positivity when present in a COVID-19 suspected patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床症状与RT-PCR结果在COVID-19诊断中的相关性:利用布基纳法索常规数据进行的分析
本研究旨在评估布基纳法索疑似COVID-19症状与诊断SARS-CoV-2感染的RT-PCR结果之间的相关性。我们分析了布基纳法索的SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR常规诊断数据。数据采集时间为2020年3月9日至2020年9月30日,采集时间为2019冠状病毒病监测框架。采用敏感性、特异性、预测值和Kappa一致性来检验COVID-19症状与RT-PCR结果的相关性。使用RT-PCR对2217名参与者进行了COVID-19检测,其中779人COVID-19阳性。参与者的平均年龄为38.7±17.69岁。参与者的疑似症状为发热(40.4%)、咳嗽(38.6%)、虚弱(27.3%)、头痛(23.6%)、呼吸困难(20.8%)和吞咽困难(16.3%)。与RT-PCR结果相比,至少存在一种临床体征的敏感性为62.13%,特异性为39.85%。出现COVID-19疑似症状与RT-PCR结果的kappa一致性为0.017。患者出现贫血和/或嗅觉缺失导致RT-PCR阳性预测值为91.30%。COVID-19症状与RT-PCR结果诊断COVID-19相关性很弱。本研究证实,与SARS-CoV-2感染相关的大多数临床症状并非COVID-19特异性,因此需要始终将RT-PCR或其他生物学检测与临床诊断相结合。然而,在COVID-19疑似患者中出现的高水平RT-PCR阳性引起了人们的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Campylobacter infections in Middle Eastern children: Review article The diagnostic concordance between micro real-time PCR and Lowenstein Jensen (LJ) media assays for pulmonary tuberculosis detection with associated clinical characteristics In vitro activity of Tityus metuendus and Brotheas amazonicus scorpion venoms against Plasmodium falciparum FRC3 A rare case of pelvic hydatidosis Recent trends in the Susceptibility pattern of Candida to Fluconazole and Amphotericin B at a tertiary care center in South India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1