Adverse event monitoring of antiretroviral drugs- A pharmacovigilance perspective

R. Sehgal, M. Gupta, P. Ghalaut
{"title":"Adverse event monitoring of antiretroviral drugs- A pharmacovigilance perspective","authors":"R. Sehgal, M. Gupta, P. Ghalaut","doi":"10.7439/IJPR.V7I3.3988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antiretroviral drugs in patients of HIV/AIDS by active and spontaneous/solicited ADR monitoring. Methods: A prospective observational study to monitor ADRs was carried out over 12 months in 187 patients of HIV/AIDS taking antiretroviral treatment. The ADRs reported were evaluated for incidence, frequency, causality, severity, seriousness and preventability. Causality assessment was done using the WHO-UMC and Naranjo scale, seriousness was considered as per the ADR reporting form, severity and preventability assessment were done as per the Hartwig severity scale and the modified Schumock and Thornton criteria respectively. Results: 103 patients (55.1%) reported at least one ADR and 108 ADR reports were collected. Mostly the ADRs came from the tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz regimen with efavirenz related to most number of ADRs (52.5%). Maximum ADRs belonged to the system organ class of neurological disorders (64.81%) followed by gastrointestinal (19.44%) and skin and appendages disorders (7.40%). Causality assessment by WHO-UMC scale revealed most of the reactions as possible (99.2%) while Naranjo scale assessed most of them as probable (69.8%). Most of the reactions (96.1%) were mild in nature and no serious reactions were reported. Preventability assessment determined most reactions (94.6%) as not preventable. Conclusion: Antiretroviral drugs have a huge potential for causing ADRs specially neurological and gastrointestinal. Active pharmacovigilance is vital in recognizing such reactions to ensure timely management and optimal therapeutic outcomes.","PeriodicalId":14194,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacological Research","volume":"89 1","pages":"65-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7439/IJPR.V7I3.3988","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To monitor and evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to antiretroviral drugs in patients of HIV/AIDS by active and spontaneous/solicited ADR monitoring. Methods: A prospective observational study to monitor ADRs was carried out over 12 months in 187 patients of HIV/AIDS taking antiretroviral treatment. The ADRs reported were evaluated for incidence, frequency, causality, severity, seriousness and preventability. Causality assessment was done using the WHO-UMC and Naranjo scale, seriousness was considered as per the ADR reporting form, severity and preventability assessment were done as per the Hartwig severity scale and the modified Schumock and Thornton criteria respectively. Results: 103 patients (55.1%) reported at least one ADR and 108 ADR reports were collected. Mostly the ADRs came from the tenofovir + lamivudine + efavirenz regimen with efavirenz related to most number of ADRs (52.5%). Maximum ADRs belonged to the system organ class of neurological disorders (64.81%) followed by gastrointestinal (19.44%) and skin and appendages disorders (7.40%). Causality assessment by WHO-UMC scale revealed most of the reactions as possible (99.2%) while Naranjo scale assessed most of them as probable (69.8%). Most of the reactions (96.1%) were mild in nature and no serious reactions were reported. Preventability assessment determined most reactions (94.6%) as not preventable. Conclusion: Antiretroviral drugs have a huge potential for causing ADRs specially neurological and gastrointestinal. Active pharmacovigilance is vital in recognizing such reactions to ensure timely management and optimal therapeutic outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗逆转录病毒药物的不良事件监测-药物警戒的观点
目的:通过主动和主动/主动的ADR监测,监测和评价HIV/AIDS患者抗逆转录病毒药物的不良反应(ADR)。方法:对187例接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的HIV/AIDS患者进行为期12个月的不良反应监测前瞻性观察研究。对报告的不良反应的发生率、频率、因果关系、严重程度、严重性和可预防性进行评估。采用WHO-UMC和Naranjo量表进行因果关系评估,根据ADR报告表考虑严重性,分别按照Hartwig严重程度量表和修订的Schumock和Thornton标准进行严重性和可预防性评估。结果:103例(55.1%)患者报告了至少一次ADR,共收集到108例ADR报告。不良反应主要来自替诺福韦+拉米夫定+依非韦伦方案,其中依非韦伦与adr相关最多(52.5%)。不良反应最多的是系统器官类神经系统疾病(64.81%),其次是胃肠道疾病(19.44%)和皮肤及附属物疾病(7.40%)。根据WHO-UMC量表进行的因果关系评估显示,大多数反应是可能的(99.2%),而Naranjo量表将大多数反应评估为可能的(69.8%)。绝大多数(96.1%)为轻度反应,无严重反应报告。可预防性评估确定大多数反应(94.6%)是不可预防的。结论:抗逆转录病毒药物极易引起不良反应,特别是神经系统和胃肠道不良反应。积极的药物警戒对于识别此类反应以确保及时管理和最佳治疗结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Open reduction and Internal fixation of mandibular subcondylar fractures with quadrangular plate - A Case Report Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome - A brief introduction Antimicrobial Potential of Endophytes from Datura metel Linn. Antiviral potential of mangiferin against poliovirus Fluindione and cefixime induced cutaneous bleeding manifestations –A case report and review of literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1