“It’s the economy, stupid”: Changing Irish minds on the Lisbon Treaty

Mervyn O’Driscoll
{"title":"“It’s the economy, stupid”: Changing Irish minds on the Lisbon Treaty","authors":"Mervyn O’Driscoll","doi":"10.5771/0947-9511-2022-1-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ireland was Europeanised as part of a pragmatic top-down policy of modernisation. The national bargain with regional integration was built on soft Europeanism and rudimentary knowledge about the “ever closer union”. By the 21st century the vir‐ tuous Irish-EU narrative was weakening. Multiple domestic factors contributed. They included political fragmentation, affluence, and constitutional constrictions on the government’s conduct during referendum campaigns. Complacency, dis‐ traction, and an energetic single-issue party (Libertas) were some of the immediate causes of the defeat of Lisbon in 2008. The legitimacy of the first Lisbon referen‐ dum was undercut in an extended post-mortem that laid bare the electorate’s lack of knowledge. The negotiation of guarantees to ameliorate concerns about some national sacred cows and clarify misapprehensions played a crucial part in the ap‐ proach to the second referendum. However, the Global Financial Crisis was paramount. It invigorated the conventional narrative that full EU membership was axiomatic to Ireland’s continued economic and fiscal health.","PeriodicalId":53497,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9511-2022-1-123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ireland was Europeanised as part of a pragmatic top-down policy of modernisation. The national bargain with regional integration was built on soft Europeanism and rudimentary knowledge about the “ever closer union”. By the 21st century the vir‐ tuous Irish-EU narrative was weakening. Multiple domestic factors contributed. They included political fragmentation, affluence, and constitutional constrictions on the government’s conduct during referendum campaigns. Complacency, dis‐ traction, and an energetic single-issue party (Libertas) were some of the immediate causes of the defeat of Lisbon in 2008. The legitimacy of the first Lisbon referen‐ dum was undercut in an extended post-mortem that laid bare the electorate’s lack of knowledge. The negotiation of guarantees to ameliorate concerns about some national sacred cows and clarify misapprehensions played a crucial part in the ap‐ proach to the second referendum. However, the Global Financial Crisis was paramount. It invigorated the conventional narrative that full EU membership was axiomatic to Ireland’s continued economic and fiscal health.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“这是经济问题,笨蛋”:改变爱尔兰人对里斯本条约的看法
作为务实的自上而下的现代化政策的一部分,爱尔兰被欧洲化了。国家与区域一体化的交易建立在软欧洲主义和对“日益紧密的联盟”的基本认识之上。到了21世纪,爱尔兰-欧盟的邪恶叙事正在减弱。多重国内因素起了作用。这些因素包括政治分裂、富裕以及宪法对政府在公投期间行为的限制。自满、疏离和充满活力的单一议题政党(自由自由党)是2008年里斯本公投失败的直接原因。第一次《里斯本条约》公投的合法性在冗长的事后分析中遭到削弱,暴露出选民对该条约缺乏了解。谈判保证,以减轻对一些国家神圣不可侵犯的问题的担忧,并澄清误解,在第二次公投中发挥了至关重要的作用。然而,全球金融危机是最重要的。它重振了一种传统说法,即欧盟成员国身份对爱尔兰持续的经济和财政健康是理所当然的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of European Integration History
Journal of European Integration History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Divided by Memory: Divergent Memory Cultures and the Debate about Democracy in the EU Colonial Memories and the French Partisan Right: Preserving National Identity Through or Against Diversity (2002-2022) Constructing a Collective Memory in the Franco-German-Swiss Upper Rhine Region: European, Trans(national) or Regional? The Complexity of Memory in Global Relations and European Integration: A Theoretical Perspective In memoriam Claudia Hiepel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1