Programme responses for men who perpetrate intimate partner violence in the context of alcohol or other drugs: a scoping review

IF 0.8 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Advances in Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1108/add-07-2022-0021
Van Nguyen, Margaret Kertesz, Jennifer Davidson, C. Humphreys, A. Laslett
{"title":"Programme responses for men who perpetrate intimate partner violence in the context of alcohol or other drugs: a scoping review","authors":"Van Nguyen, Margaret Kertesz, Jennifer Davidson, C. Humphreys, A. Laslett","doi":"10.1108/add-07-2022-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nSubstance use plays a significant role in the perpetration of much intimate partner violence (IPV). However, responses to these two issues are rarely integrated. Single focus programme responses can lead to poor outcomes for men as well as their families experiencing these intersecting issues. This scoping paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on contextual factors influencing the development and implementation of combined programmes.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nFour electronic databases were systematically searched in May 2021 and December 2021. Twenty-one peer-reviewed studies reporting on ten programmes were included.\n\n\nFindings\nThis scoping review revealed that combined programme responses are an underdeveloped area of research and evaluation. The limited evidence base indicated systemic barriers hindering services’ capacity to expand this field of work, affecting implementation and outcomes. Support is required from the wider service systems to intervene in men’s perpetration of IPV in the context of substance use.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFindings in this scoping review demonstrate the importance of fostering a coordinated and collective response to IPV in the context of substance use. Combined programmes have the potential to reduce siloed practices, enabling more holistic responses for men with intersecting issues. However, researchers and policymakers must also address contextual issues hindering or enabling combined programmes’ implementation and development.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nMapping the evidence based on combined programmes provides direction for further development and research to expand this field of inquiry.\n","PeriodicalId":51922,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/add-07-2022-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose Substance use plays a significant role in the perpetration of much intimate partner violence (IPV). However, responses to these two issues are rarely integrated. Single focus programme responses can lead to poor outcomes for men as well as their families experiencing these intersecting issues. This scoping paper aims to establish the current state of knowledge on contextual factors influencing the development and implementation of combined programmes. Design/methodology/approach Four electronic databases were systematically searched in May 2021 and December 2021. Twenty-one peer-reviewed studies reporting on ten programmes were included. Findings This scoping review revealed that combined programme responses are an underdeveloped area of research and evaluation. The limited evidence base indicated systemic barriers hindering services’ capacity to expand this field of work, affecting implementation and outcomes. Support is required from the wider service systems to intervene in men’s perpetration of IPV in the context of substance use. Practical implications Findings in this scoping review demonstrate the importance of fostering a coordinated and collective response to IPV in the context of substance use. Combined programmes have the potential to reduce siloed practices, enabling more holistic responses for men with intersecting issues. However, researchers and policymakers must also address contextual issues hindering or enabling combined programmes’ implementation and development. Originality/value Mapping the evidence based on combined programmes provides direction for further development and research to expand this field of inquiry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对在酒精或其他药物情况下实施亲密伴侣暴力的男子的方案对策:范围审查
物质使用在亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的实施中起着重要作用。然而,对这两个问题的反应很少结合起来。单一的重点方案反应可能导致男性及其家庭面临这些交叉问题的不良结果。这份范围界定文件的目的是确定影响综合方案的制定和执行的背景因素的知识现状。设计/方法/方法于2021年5月和2021年12月系统检索了四个电子数据库。报告了10个项目的21项同行评议研究。这项范围审查表明,综合规划反应是一个研究和评价不发达的领域。有限的证据基础表明,系统性障碍阻碍了服务部门扩大这一工作领域的能力,影响了实施和成果。需要得到更广泛的服务系统的支持,以干预男子在使用药物的情况下实施IPV。实际意义本次范围审查的结果表明,在药物使用的背景下,促进对IPV的协调和集体反应的重要性。综合方案有可能减少孤立的做法,使男性能够对交叉问题作出更全面的反应。然而,科学家和决策者还必须解决阻碍或使联合项目的实施和发展成为可能的背景问题。原创性/价值根据综合方案绘制证据为进一步发展和研究提供了方向,以扩大这一调查领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Dual Diagnosis
Advances in Dual Diagnosis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The needs of carers who support people living with schizophrenia and a substance use disorder: a multiperspective evaluation Combating stigma: development and implementation of an education resource on older adults behavioral health challenges Positive addiction recovery therapy: a replication and follow-up study Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation implementation within residential substance use disorder treatment centers for patients with comorbid depression Addiction recovery stories: Bradley Maguire in conversation with Lisa Ogilvie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1