Donations for Refugee Crises: In-kind Versus Cash Assistance

Telesilla O. Kotsi, Owen Q. Wu, Alfonso Pedraza Martinez
{"title":"Donations for Refugee Crises: In-kind Versus Cash Assistance","authors":"Telesilla O. Kotsi, Owen Q. Wu, Alfonso Pedraza Martinez","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3685845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Six million refugees lived in camps in 2021 due to multiple armed conflicts worldwide. Regulations often impede refugees’ integration into host countries, and thus refugees have to seek help from humanitarian organizations (HOs). HOs traditionally provide in-kind (e.g. food) assistance and, just recently, offer cash (monetary assistance) that refugees can spend at local retail stores. However, cash assistance can be exploited by local retailers’ market power, which challenges the HOs’ mission of helping refugees while doing no harm to host communities. Practical Relevance: Completely informed by field research in three refugee camps in north-western Greece, we analyze the trade-off between in-kind and cash assistance from the perspective of an HO. We propose two cash assistance policies, implementable by a partnership between the HO and the local government, to curb the retailer’s market power and ensure that the refugees, the local residents, and the retailer are better off than if only in-kind assistance is provided. Methodology: We use field research to define our research setting and support our main modeling assumptions and parameters. Then, we use a game-theoretical model to analyze the interactions among multiple stakeholders in an ecosystem consisting of an HO, refugees, a monopolistic retailer, local residents, and government. Results: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed cash assistance policies that benefit refugees and local residents while ensuring the retailer’s profitability. In particular, a price-dependent cash assistance (PDCA) policy aligns the incentives between the retailer and the HO-government partnership. This new policy for cash assistance acts as a lever for the retailer to set desirable prices, which benefit both refugees and the host community. Managerial Implications: We provide prescriptions that can guide HOs to improve their budget allocation between in-kind and cash assistance for refugees living in areas where market power exists. Moreover, we clearly outline the roles of HOs and the local government in a partnership for cash assistance to refugees.","PeriodicalId":7501,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3685845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem definition: Six million refugees lived in camps in 2021 due to multiple armed conflicts worldwide. Regulations often impede refugees’ integration into host countries, and thus refugees have to seek help from humanitarian organizations (HOs). HOs traditionally provide in-kind (e.g. food) assistance and, just recently, offer cash (monetary assistance) that refugees can spend at local retail stores. However, cash assistance can be exploited by local retailers’ market power, which challenges the HOs’ mission of helping refugees while doing no harm to host communities. Practical Relevance: Completely informed by field research in three refugee camps in north-western Greece, we analyze the trade-off between in-kind and cash assistance from the perspective of an HO. We propose two cash assistance policies, implementable by a partnership between the HO and the local government, to curb the retailer’s market power and ensure that the refugees, the local residents, and the retailer are better off than if only in-kind assistance is provided. Methodology: We use field research to define our research setting and support our main modeling assumptions and parameters. Then, we use a game-theoretical model to analyze the interactions among multiple stakeholders in an ecosystem consisting of an HO, refugees, a monopolistic retailer, local residents, and government. Results: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed cash assistance policies that benefit refugees and local residents while ensuring the retailer’s profitability. In particular, a price-dependent cash assistance (PDCA) policy aligns the incentives between the retailer and the HO-government partnership. This new policy for cash assistance acts as a lever for the retailer to set desirable prices, which benefit both refugees and the host community. Managerial Implications: We provide prescriptions that can guide HOs to improve their budget allocation between in-kind and cash assistance for refugees living in areas where market power exists. Moreover, we clearly outline the roles of HOs and the local government in a partnership for cash assistance to refugees.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对难民危机的捐赠:实物援助与现金援助
问题定义:由于全球多次武装冲突,2021年有600万难民住在难民营。法规往往阻碍难民融入东道国,因此难民不得不向人道主义组织(HOs)寻求帮助。HOs传统上提供实物(例如食品)援助,最近还提供现金(货币援助),难民可以在当地零售商店消费。然而,现金援助可以被当地零售商的市场力量所利用,这挑战了HOs在不损害收容社区的情况下帮助难民的使命。实际意义:通过对希腊西北部三个难民营的实地研究,我们从世界卫生组织的角度分析了实物援助和现金援助之间的权衡。我们提出了两项现金援助政策,由世界卫生组织和当地政府合作实施,以遏制零售商的市场力量,并确保难民、当地居民和零售商比只提供实物援助更好。方法:我们使用实地调查来定义我们的研究设置,并支持我们的主要建模假设和参数。在此基础上,运用博弈论模型分析了由移民、难民、垄断零售商、当地居民和政府组成的生态系统中多个利益相关者之间的相互作用。结果:我们证明了我们提出的现金援助政策的有效性,使难民和当地居民受益,同时确保零售商的盈利能力。特别是,价格相关现金援助(PDCA)政策使零售商与卫生组织-政府伙伴关系之间的激励机制保持一致。这项新的现金援助政策起到了零售商设定理想价格的杠杆作用,这对难民和收容社区都有利。管理启示:我们提供的处方可以指导HOs改善对生活在市场力量存在的地区的难民的实物和现金援助之间的预算分配。此外,我们明确概述了居委会和地方政府在向难民提供现金援助的伙伴关系中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change and State-Building in the World’s Most Agricultural Countries The heterogeneous effects of agricultural conservation easements on the loss of farmland to development in New England Displacement Risk in Agricultural Commodity Markets: The Impact of Plant-Based Meat Interest Group Responses to Reform Efforts in the U.S. House of Representatives: The Case of Big Sugar Fishing under the Radar: Illuminating the Compliance Gap of Fishing Bans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1