{"title":"On order and prohibition","authors":"Daniël Van Olmen","doi":"10.1075/sl.19036.van","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The present article examines the claim in the literature that the negative first principle, i.e. the preference\n for the order negation-verb to verb-negation, is stronger in negative imperatives (or prohibitives) than in negative declaratives.\n To test this hypothesis, we develop – in contrast to earlier research – a systematic, three-way classification of languages, which\n is also operationalized as a ranking capturing the overall level of strength of the principle. This classification is applied to a\n genealogically and geographically balanced sample of 179 languages. In addition, we consider the role of several factors known to\n correlate with the position of negation – like its form, constituent order and areality. However, no cross-linguistic evidence is\n found for any difference in negation’s position between negative imperatives and negative declaratives. We therefore conclude that\n the hypothesis should be rejected.","PeriodicalId":46377,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.19036.van","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
The present article examines the claim in the literature that the negative first principle, i.e. the preference
for the order negation-verb to verb-negation, is stronger in negative imperatives (or prohibitives) than in negative declaratives.
To test this hypothesis, we develop – in contrast to earlier research – a systematic, three-way classification of languages, which
is also operationalized as a ranking capturing the overall level of strength of the principle. This classification is applied to a
genealogically and geographically balanced sample of 179 languages. In addition, we consider the role of several factors known to
correlate with the position of negation – like its form, constituent order and areality. However, no cross-linguistic evidence is
found for any difference in negation’s position between negative imperatives and negative declaratives. We therefore conclude that
the hypothesis should be rejected.
期刊介绍:
Studies in Language provides a forum for the discussion of issues in contemporary linguistics from discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspectives. Areas of central concern are: discourse grammar; syntactic, morphological and semantic universals; pragmatics; grammaticalization and grammaticalization theory; and the description of problems in individual languages from a discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological perspective. Special emphasis is placed on works which contribute to the development of discourse-pragmatic, functional, and typological theory and which explore the application of empirical methodology to the analysis of grammar.