Towards improved and more transparent ethics in randomised controlled trials in development social science

IF 0.9 4区 经济学 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Journal of Development Effectiveness Pub Date : 2023-04-07 DOI:10.1080/19439342.2023.2196978
David K. Evans
{"title":"Towards improved and more transparent ethics in randomised controlled trials in development social science","authors":"David K. Evans","doi":"10.1080/19439342.2023.2196978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomised controlled trials in development economics, political science, and other social science fields have been on the rise in recent decades. Recent awards and trials in development economics have re-ignited active discussions of the ethics of these trials. This note surveys common ethical concerns and proposes a series of practical suggestions to help researchers and policymakers be more mindful of and transparent about ethics as they consider, design, implement, and report randomised controlled trials and other impact evaluations in development settings.","PeriodicalId":46384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Development Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2023.2196978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Randomised controlled trials in development economics, political science, and other social science fields have been on the rise in recent decades. Recent awards and trials in development economics have re-ignited active discussions of the ethics of these trials. This note surveys common ethical concerns and proposes a series of practical suggestions to help researchers and policymakers be more mindful of and transparent about ethics as they consider, design, implement, and report randomised controlled trials and other impact evaluations in development settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在发展社会科学的随机对照试验中改进和更透明的伦理
近几十年来,发展经济学、政治学和其他社会科学领域的随机对照试验一直在增加。最近在发展经济学领域的奖励和试验重新引发了对这些试验的伦理性的积极讨论。这份报告调查了常见的伦理问题,并提出了一系列切实可行的建议,以帮助研究人员和政策制定者在考虑、设计、实施和报告发展环境中的随机对照试验和其他影响评估时更加注意和透明伦理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Does the small business programme benefit self-employed workers? Evidence from Nicaragua Grow the pie, or have it? Using machine learning to impact heterogeneity in the Ultra-poor graduation model How do patent subsidies drive SMEs to patent? Evidence from China Impact of cash transfer on food accessibility and calorie-intake in Pakistan Self-selection versus population-based sampling for evaluation of an agronomy training program in Uganda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1