Seven Challenges for the Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Hospitals

Bruno Folly Guimarães e Silva, V. Prochnik
{"title":"Seven Challenges for the Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Hospitals","authors":"Bruno Folly Guimarães e Silva, V. Prochnik","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.899343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a literature review on performance measurement in health care institutions. This survey identifies seven main challenges to the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The external environment poses three different challenges: more rigorous regulation processes, increasingly diverse customer needs and stiffer competition. In the internal environment, the main challenges to health care management are: conflicts between management and physicians' interests, conflicts among value proposals for different kinds of customers, lack of performance measurement methods and inefficient information systems. The empirical part of the article discusses the use of performance measurement techniques by a sample of 15 Brazilian hospitals. The article shows that all the seven challenges found in the international literature are also present in the Brazilian healthcare institutions. Among other conclusions, its shows that healthcare institutions in Brazil make use of several performance measures in day-to-day management. However, the information produced by these measures is not linked to the hospitals' strategic planning. In general, the indicators are traditional and well-known and can be applied to any sector of activity. Only some financial and internal process indicators were specific to hospitals' needs and could also be found in the international literature. The indicators were distributed unequally across the four BSC perspectives. Much more accurate indicators were available for the financial and internal process approaches than for the other two approaches (clients and learning and growth). Performance measurement systems can thus be said to be much needed in Brazilian hospitals, and the focal task in implementing them is to link them with the strategic plan design. This article was presented at the 3rd CONFERENCE ON PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL, Nice, September 22-23, 2005.","PeriodicalId":73765,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health care law & policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health care law & policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.899343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The article presents a literature review on performance measurement in health care institutions. This survey identifies seven main challenges to the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC). The external environment poses three different challenges: more rigorous regulation processes, increasingly diverse customer needs and stiffer competition. In the internal environment, the main challenges to health care management are: conflicts between management and physicians' interests, conflicts among value proposals for different kinds of customers, lack of performance measurement methods and inefficient information systems. The empirical part of the article discusses the use of performance measurement techniques by a sample of 15 Brazilian hospitals. The article shows that all the seven challenges found in the international literature are also present in the Brazilian healthcare institutions. Among other conclusions, its shows that healthcare institutions in Brazil make use of several performance measures in day-to-day management. However, the information produced by these measures is not linked to the hospitals' strategic planning. In general, the indicators are traditional and well-known and can be applied to any sector of activity. Only some financial and internal process indicators were specific to hospitals' needs and could also be found in the international literature. The indicators were distributed unequally across the four BSC perspectives. Much more accurate indicators were available for the financial and internal process approaches than for the other two approaches (clients and learning and growth). Performance measurement systems can thus be said to be much needed in Brazilian hospitals, and the focal task in implementing them is to link them with the strategic plan design. This article was presented at the 3rd CONFERENCE ON PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT CONTROL, Nice, September 22-23, 2005.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院实施平衡计分卡的七大挑战
本文对医疗机构绩效评估的相关文献进行了综述。这项调查确定了实施平衡计分卡(BSC)的七个主要挑战。外部环境带来了三种不同的挑战:更严格的监管程序、日益多样化的客户需求和更激烈的竞争。在内部环境中,医疗管理面临的主要挑战是:管理层与医生利益冲突,不同类型客户的价值建议冲突,绩效衡量方法缺乏,信息系统效率低下。文章的实证部分讨论了15家巴西医院样本的绩效测量技术的使用。文章表明,在国际文献中发现的所有七个挑战也存在于巴西的医疗机构。在其他结论中,它表明巴西的医疗机构在日常管理中使用了几种绩效指标。然而,这些措施产生的信息与医院的战略规划没有联系。一般来说,这些指标是传统的和众所周知的,可以应用于任何活动部门。只有一些财务和内部流程指标是医院具体需要的,也可以在国际文献中找到。这些指标在四个平衡计分卡视角中分布不均。与其他两种方法(客户、学习和成长)相比,财务和内部过程方法提供了更准确的指标。因此,巴西医院可以说非常需要绩效衡量系统,而实施这些系统的重点任务是将它们与战略计划设计联系起来。本文发表于2005年9月22-23日在尼斯举行的第三届绩效评估与管理控制会议上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
When Not to Ask: A Defense of Choice-Masking Nudges in Medical Research. REFUTING THE RIGHT NOT TO KNOW. FAIR BENEFITS AND ITS CRITICS: WHO IS RIGHT? DO ETHICS DEMAND EVALUATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LAWS? SHIFTING SCIENTIFIC SANDS AND THE CASE OF YOUTH SPORTS-RELATED TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY LAWS. Fragmentation in Mental Health Benefits and Services: A Preliminary Examination into Consumption and Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1