Politics and Poetics: Narratives of a (Central-)European River

E. Király
{"title":"Politics and Poetics: Narratives of a (Central-)European River","authors":"E. Király","doi":"10.31168/2619-0877.2022.5.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Danube, along with Galicia and Bukovina, was the landscape most commonly associated—between 1955 and 1989—with a widely understood lost Austrian identity and with Austrian Central Europe. The article examines two books on the Danube which are based on a combination of geographical and historical perspectives and establishing a correlation between the Habsburg tradition and the wider Central European space. Both authors had personally visited the places they write about, but their works are not reducible to mere travel descriptions or trip reports. Ernst Trost’s book Die Donau. Lebenslauf eines Stromes was published in 1968, a few years after the Habsburg heritage study Das Blieb vom Doppeladler, which also contained a description of the Danube journey. Claudio Magris’s book Danubio can in turn be seen as a continuation of a dissertation written twenty years earlier (Der Habsburgische Mythos in der modernen österreichischen Literatur) on the literary “afterlife” of the Habsburg Monarchy. If Trost’s book bears the hallmarks of the Cold War, Magris’s is a product of the new discourses on Central Europe that emerged in the 1980s. Both books are not only embedded in the political discourses of their time, but practically “reinvent” the Danube as a political and poetic theme. In a comparative analysis of the two books, the starting point is the central theme of both texts, each of which is a Danube master-narrative. The paper then considers how the two Danube books structure spaces and set boundaries; then general questions of genre affiliation are treated.","PeriodicalId":30305,"journal":{"name":"Central European Political Studies Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Political Studies Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31168/2619-0877.2022.5.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Danube, along with Galicia and Bukovina, was the landscape most commonly associated—between 1955 and 1989—with a widely understood lost Austrian identity and with Austrian Central Europe. The article examines two books on the Danube which are based on a combination of geographical and historical perspectives and establishing a correlation between the Habsburg tradition and the wider Central European space. Both authors had personally visited the places they write about, but their works are not reducible to mere travel descriptions or trip reports. Ernst Trost’s book Die Donau. Lebenslauf eines Stromes was published in 1968, a few years after the Habsburg heritage study Das Blieb vom Doppeladler, which also contained a description of the Danube journey. Claudio Magris’s book Danubio can in turn be seen as a continuation of a dissertation written twenty years earlier (Der Habsburgische Mythos in der modernen österreichischen Literatur) on the literary “afterlife” of the Habsburg Monarchy. If Trost’s book bears the hallmarks of the Cold War, Magris’s is a product of the new discourses on Central Europe that emerged in the 1980s. Both books are not only embedded in the political discourses of their time, but practically “reinvent” the Danube as a political and poetic theme. In a comparative analysis of the two books, the starting point is the central theme of both texts, each of which is a Danube master-narrative. The paper then considers how the two Danube books structure spaces and set boundaries; then general questions of genre affiliation are treated.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治与诗学:一条(中欧)欧洲河流的叙事
1955年至1989年间,多瑙河与加利西亚和布科维纳一道,是最常被人们与奥地利身份和奥地利中欧联系在一起的景观。本文考察了两本关于多瑙河的书,这两本书结合了地理和历史的观点,并建立了哈布斯堡传统与更广阔的中欧空间之间的联系。两位作者都亲自到过他们所写的地方,但他们的作品不能简化为单纯的旅行描述或旅行报告。Ernst Trost的《Donau》一书。《生活的故事》出版于1968年,比哈布斯堡王朝的遗产研究《多普勒德勒之旅》晚了几年,后者也包含了对多瑙河之旅的描述。克劳迪奥·马格里斯的书《达努比奥》可以被看作是二十年前写的关于哈布斯堡王朝文学“来世”的论文(Der Habsburgische Mythos in Der modernen österreichischen literature)的延续。如果说特罗斯特的书带有冷战的特征,那么马格里斯的书则是20世纪80年代出现的关于中欧的新话语的产物。这两本书不仅嵌入了他们时代的政治话语,而且实际上“重塑”了多瑙河作为一个政治和诗歌主题。在对两本书的比较分析中,起点是两个文本的中心主题,每个文本都是多瑙河大师叙事。然后,本文考虑了这两本多瑙河图书如何构造空间和设置边界;然后是关于类型归属的一般性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s Organizations in Belgrade from the Last Quarter of the Nineteenth to the Early Twentieth Centuries A Perfect Monarch: The Image of Francis Joseph I in Textbooks for Habsburg Schools The Image of Power in the Past and Present in the Writings of Jozef Szujski The Birthday of the Party Leader: Klement Gottwald’s Image on the Pages of the “Rudé Právo” Newspaper The Ice-Regime of the Danube and Winter Crossing Over Rivers in the Early Modern Times (1529–1650)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1