Evaluation of Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Urine and Feces of Patients with Acute or Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

Hossein Norouzian, N. Shahrokhi, S. Sabeti, S. Bouzari, M. Pooya
{"title":"Evaluation of Quinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolates Recovered from Urine and Feces of Patients with Acute or Recurrent Urinary Tract Infection","authors":"Hossein Norouzian, N. Shahrokhi, S. Sabeti, S. Bouzari, M. Pooya","doi":"10.29252/jommid.7.4.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"*Correspondences Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir Tel: +98 21 64112220 Fax: +98 21 64112803 Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially in Gram-negative uropathogens such as Escherichia coli, is the main barrier to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). In recent years, the dramatically increased resistance of E. coli to quinolones, a group of widely used antibiotics, has become a significant concern. Methods: In this descriptive crosssectional study, we collected 261 E. coli isolates from the urine and stool samples of patients, referred to or hospitalized at Loghman hospital in Tehran, Iran, with either acute or recurrent UTI. The susceptibility testing for quinolones was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the recent protocols. Results: The frequency of resistant E. coli isolates was higher against nalidixic acid than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (67.8% vs. 48.7% and 44.1% respectively). When comparing acute and recurrent phases of UTI, in the urine samples, no significant difference was seen in the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid and norfloxacin, while this frequency against ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in recurrent UTI (68% vs. 48.2%). However, in the stool samples, the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid was higher in recurrent UTI (77.1% vs. 55.7%), while no significant difference was seen against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in these phases. Conclusion: Regarding the antibiotic type and frequency of the administration, the resistance pattern of E. coli to quinolones seems to differ in acute and recurrent phases of UTI.","PeriodicalId":34460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/jommid.7.4.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

*Correspondences Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir Tel: +98 21 64112220 Fax: +98 21 64112803 Introduction: Antibiotic resistance, especially in Gram-negative uropathogens such as Escherichia coli, is the main barrier to treat urinary tract infection (UTI). In recent years, the dramatically increased resistance of E. coli to quinolones, a group of widely used antibiotics, has become a significant concern. Methods: In this descriptive crosssectional study, we collected 261 E. coli isolates from the urine and stool samples of patients, referred to or hospitalized at Loghman hospital in Tehran, Iran, with either acute or recurrent UTI. The susceptibility testing for quinolones was performed by the disk diffusion method according to the recent protocols. Results: The frequency of resistant E. coli isolates was higher against nalidixic acid than ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin (67.8% vs. 48.7% and 44.1% respectively). When comparing acute and recurrent phases of UTI, in the urine samples, no significant difference was seen in the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid and norfloxacin, while this frequency against ciprofloxacin was significantly higher in recurrent UTI (68% vs. 48.2%). However, in the stool samples, the frequency of resistant isolates against nalidixic acid was higher in recurrent UTI (77.1% vs. 55.7%), while no significant difference was seen against ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin in these phases. Conclusion: Regarding the antibiotic type and frequency of the administration, the resistance pattern of E. coli to quinolones seems to differ in acute and recurrent phases of UTI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性或复发性尿路感染患者尿液和粪便中分离的大肠埃希菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药性评价
*通信Email1: m_pooya@pasteur.ac.ir Email2: bouzari@pasteur.ac.ir电话:+98 21 64112220传真:+98 21 64112803简介:抗生素耐药性,特别是革兰氏阴性尿路病原体如大肠杆菌,是治疗尿路感染(UTI)的主要障碍。近年来,大肠杆菌对喹诺酮类抗生素(一组广泛使用的抗生素)的耐药性急剧增加,已成为一个重大问题。方法:在这项描述性横断面研究中,我们从伊朗德黑兰Loghman医院转诊或住院的急性或复发性尿路感染患者的尿液和粪便样本中收集了261株大肠杆菌。喹诺酮类药物的药敏试验按现行方案采用纸片扩散法。结果:对纳利地酸的耐药率67.8%高于环丙沙星和诺氟沙星(分别为48.7%和44.1%);当比较尿路感染的急性期和复发期时,在尿液样本中,对纳利地酸和诺氟沙星耐药的分离株的频率没有显著差异,而对环丙沙星的耐药频率在复发性尿路感染中明显更高(68%对48.2%)。然而,在粪便样本中,对纳利地酸耐药的分离株在复发性UTI中出现的频率更高(77.1%对55.7%),而在这些阶段对环丙沙星和诺氟沙星无显著差异。结论:就抗生素种类和给药频率而言,大肠杆菌对喹诺酮类药物的耐药模式在尿路感染的急性期和复发期似乎有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Salmonella enterica Subspecies enterica Serovar Typhi (Salmonella typhi) Infection in Febrile Patients at the Sino-Gabonese Friendship Hospital in Franceville: A Two-Year Retrospective Study in South East Gabon Intraventricular Administration of Cefepime for the Treatment of Meningitis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa A Bibliometric Analysis Study on Pregnancy and COVID-19 A Recent Profile of HIV-Positive Patients Attending an Integrated Testing and Counseling Centre (ICTC) at a Tertiary Care Center in Bangalore, India Prevalence of Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from Clinical Samples and Their Antibiotic Resistance Pattern
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1