Rubén Francisco Palafox Carvajal, Miriam Teresa Domínguez Guedea
{"title":"Stress in university research professors: A systematic review","authors":"Rubén Francisco Palafox Carvajal, Miriam Teresa Domínguez Guedea","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Research is crucial to the development of society. The literature on the challenges for scientific development highlights that chronic stress in researchers can affect their academic production and their physical and mental health. Although some literature reports the consequences of stress in the academic field, most studies are carried out on students, and there is very little knowledge on the characteristics of stress because of simultaneous academic, occupational, and socio-personal demands. Objective. To analyze and contrast the methodological components and main results of stress-related studies on researchers. Method. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide was used to analyze current evidence in the literature. Full-text scientific papers from the period 2008-2019 were included in both English and Spanish, on subjects engaged in research and teaching. The databases used were Scopus, Ebsco, Dialnet, and Web of Science. Results. One hundred and eighty records were obtained, but only four met the criteria for the qualitative evaluation. Discussion and conclusion. Stress is present in the 20% of subjects associated with psychological (lack of control, emotional fatigue, overload, multi-tasking) and institutional variables (evaluation system demands, tenure track, lack of scientific recognition). The studies emphasize aspects that predispose and precipitate stress but do not highlight psychological aspects of the stressful experience.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2021.032","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Background. Research is crucial to the development of society. The literature on the challenges for scientific development highlights that chronic stress in researchers can affect their academic production and their physical and mental health. Although some literature reports the consequences of stress in the academic field, most studies are carried out on students, and there is very little knowledge on the characteristics of stress because of simultaneous academic, occupational, and socio-personal demands. Objective. To analyze and contrast the methodological components and main results of stress-related studies on researchers. Method. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide was used to analyze current evidence in the literature. Full-text scientific papers from the period 2008-2019 were included in both English and Spanish, on subjects engaged in research and teaching. The databases used were Scopus, Ebsco, Dialnet, and Web of Science. Results. One hundred and eighty records were obtained, but only four met the criteria for the qualitative evaluation. Discussion and conclusion. Stress is present in the 20% of subjects associated with psychological (lack of control, emotional fatigue, overload, multi-tasking) and institutional variables (evaluation system demands, tenure track, lack of scientific recognition). The studies emphasize aspects that predispose and precipitate stress but do not highlight psychological aspects of the stressful experience.
背景。研究对社会的发展至关重要。关于科学发展挑战的文献强调,研究人员的慢性压力会影响他们的学术成果和身心健康。尽管一些文献报道了压力在学术领域的后果,但大多数研究都是在学生身上进行的,由于同时存在学术、职业和社会个人需求,因此对压力的特征知之甚少。目标。分析和比较研究人员压力相关研究的方法组成和主要结果。方法。系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目用于分析文献中的当前证据。2008年至2019年期间的科学论文全文以英语和西班牙语提供,涉及研究和教学主题。使用的数据库有Scopus、Ebsco、Dialnet和Web of Science。结果。获得了180份记录,但只有4份符合定性评价标准。讨论与结论。20%的科目存在与心理(缺乏控制、情绪疲劳、超负荷、多任务处理)和制度变量(评估体系要求、终身教职、缺乏科学认可)相关的压力。这些研究强调了导致压力的因素,但没有强调压力经历的心理因素。
期刊介绍:
Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.