The Influence of Novick Constructivism Learning Model on Critical Thinking Skills and Motivation in Online Learning

Maretania Arafa, S. Dwiastuti, Umi Fatmawati, Lina Mahanani
{"title":"The Influence of Novick Constructivism Learning Model on Critical Thinking Skills and Motivation in Online Learning","authors":"Maretania Arafa, S. Dwiastuti, Umi Fatmawati, Lina Mahanani","doi":"10.24042/BIOSFER.V12I1.9613","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the influence of the Novick constructivism learning model on 1) critical thinking skills and motivation, 2) the extent of influence of the Novick constructivism model on the aspects of critical thinking skills, 3) the extent of influence of the Novick constructivism model on learning motivation, and 4) the effectiveness of the model on critical thinking skills. The method used was quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The population was the tenth-grade science students. The critical thinking skills were assessed using a cognitive test, and the motivation was assessed using questionnaires. The MANOVA analysis was used to determine the model's influence. The regression analysis was used to determine the extent of the model's influence. The N-gain was used to determine the model's effectiveness. The MANOVA analysis obtained a significant value of 0.02, which was lower than 0. 05. Thus, H0 was rejected. The regression analysis showed the values of critical thinking skills ranged from high to low. The values consisted of strategies and tactics (46.49%), advance clarification (14.02%), basic support (13.96%), elementary clarification (13.62), and inference (11.88%). The motivation aspects ranging from high to low: relevance (26.35%), attention (25.98%), confidence (25.40%), and satisfaction (22.25%). The N-Gain score obtained by the experimental class was 0.437 in the moderate category. Based on the results, it can be concluded that 1) there was an influence of Novick constructivism model on critical thinking skills and motivation on online learning, 2) there was an unequal influence of the model on critical thinking aspects, and 3 ) motivation aspects, and 4) Novick constructivism model was relatively effective to be used in online learning.","PeriodicalId":33978,"journal":{"name":"Biosfer Jurnal Tadris Biologi","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosfer Jurnal Tadris Biologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24042/BIOSFER.V12I1.9613","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine the influence of the Novick constructivism learning model on 1) critical thinking skills and motivation, 2) the extent of influence of the Novick constructivism model on the aspects of critical thinking skills, 3) the extent of influence of the Novick constructivism model on learning motivation, and 4) the effectiveness of the model on critical thinking skills. The method used was quasi-experimental with a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The population was the tenth-grade science students. The critical thinking skills were assessed using a cognitive test, and the motivation was assessed using questionnaires. The MANOVA analysis was used to determine the model's influence. The regression analysis was used to determine the extent of the model's influence. The N-gain was used to determine the model's effectiveness. The MANOVA analysis obtained a significant value of 0.02, which was lower than 0. 05. Thus, H0 was rejected. The regression analysis showed the values of critical thinking skills ranged from high to low. The values consisted of strategies and tactics (46.49%), advance clarification (14.02%), basic support (13.96%), elementary clarification (13.62), and inference (11.88%). The motivation aspects ranging from high to low: relevance (26.35%), attention (25.98%), confidence (25.40%), and satisfaction (22.25%). The N-Gain score obtained by the experimental class was 0.437 in the moderate category. Based on the results, it can be concluded that 1) there was an influence of Novick constructivism model on critical thinking skills and motivation on online learning, 2) there was an unequal influence of the model on critical thinking aspects, and 3 ) motivation aspects, and 4) Novick constructivism model was relatively effective to be used in online learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诺维克建构主义学习模式对在线学习中批判性思维技能和动机的影响
本研究旨在确定诺维克建构主义学习模式对以下方面的影响:1)批判性思维技能和动机;2)诺维克建构主义学习模式对批判性思维技能各方面的影响程度;3)诺维克建构主义学习模式对学习动机的影响程度;4)诺维克建构主义学习模式对批判性思维技能的有效性。采用准实验方法,采用非等效前测后测对照组设计。人口是十年级理科学生。批判性思维能力是通过认知测试来评估的,动机是通过问卷来评估的。方差分析用于确定模型的影响。回归分析用于确定模型的影响程度。n增益用于确定模型的有效性。方差分析的显著性值为0.02,小于0。05. 因此,H0被拒绝。回归分析显示,批判性思维技能的价值由高到低不等。价值依次为战略战术(46.49%)、预先澄清(14.02%)、基本支持(13.96%)、初步澄清(13.62%)和推理(11.88%)。动机方面由高到低依次为:相关性(26.35%)、注意力(25.98%)、信心(25.40%)和满意度(22.25%)。实验班获得的N-Gain评分在中等类别为0.437。结果表明:1)Novick建构主义模式对在线学习中批判性思维技能和动机的影响是存在的;2)Novick建构主义模式对批判性思维和动机的影响是不均衡的;4)Novick建构主义模式在在线学习中是相对有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Study From Home: An Analysis of Learning Difficulties of Biology in Junior High School Students During Online Learning Development of a Lichens Pocketbook in Low-Level Organism Taxonomy Course Bioedutainment-Based Jenga Board Game: A Learning Media Development for Human Digestive System Material A Quasi-Experimental Study: The Influence of Web-Enhanced Learning on Student Learning Independence in the Human Movement System Student Eco-literacy in Preventing Ecological Damage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1