Comparison of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Risk Factors in End Stage Renal Disease Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis

{"title":"Comparison of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Risk Factors in End Stage Renal Disease Patients with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis","authors":"","doi":"10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with high mortality and frequent complications in end stage renal disease patients. Epidemiological data for this disorder across the spectrum of end stage renal disease in Thai patients is limited.\n\nObjective: To compare the prevalence and risk factors of PAH in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in end stage renal disease among the Thai patients.\n\nMaterials and Methods: The authors retrospectively studied in patients with end stage renal disease at Pranangklao Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021.\n\nResults: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. The average age of patients was 55.57±16.22 years (47.3% male). Most patients had hypertension. Most patients had been prescribed folic acid. The number of patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg was 81 (77.1%) in the hemodialysis group and 52 (54.2%) in the peritoneal dialysis group (p<0.001). PAH in hemodialysis was higher than peritoneal dialysis (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.24, p<0.001). The following were factors associated with PAH: history of coronary artery disease (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.94, p<0.009), history of beta-blocker use (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.79, p<0.015), left ventricular ejection fraction by Simpson’s method (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98, p<0.001). The variable associated with PAH (peritoneal dialysis group) in multivariate logistic regression was Hemodialysis (adjusted OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.66 to 6.03, p<0.001).\n\nConclusion: End stage renal disease in Thai patients undergoing hemodialysis carry a three-fold risk of pulmonary hypertension than peritoneal dialysis patients.\n\nKeywords: Pulmonary hypertension; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis","PeriodicalId":17486,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2023.06.13858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is associated with high mortality and frequent complications in end stage renal disease patients. Epidemiological data for this disorder across the spectrum of end stage renal disease in Thai patients is limited. Objective: To compare the prevalence and risk factors of PAH in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in end stage renal disease among the Thai patients. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively studied in patients with end stage renal disease at Pranangklao Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. The average age of patients was 55.57±16.22 years (47.3% male). Most patients had hypertension. Most patients had been prescribed folic acid. The number of patients with mean pulmonary artery pressure >20 mmHg was 81 (77.1%) in the hemodialysis group and 52 (54.2%) in the peritoneal dialysis group (p<0.001). PAH in hemodialysis was higher than peritoneal dialysis (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.24, p<0.001). The following were factors associated with PAH: history of coronary artery disease (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.29 to 5.94, p<0.009), history of beta-blocker use (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.15 to 3.79, p<0.015), left ventricular ejection fraction by Simpson’s method (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 to 0.98, p<0.001). The variable associated with PAH (peritoneal dialysis group) in multivariate logistic regression was Hemodialysis (adjusted OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.66 to 6.03, p<0.001). Conclusion: End stage renal disease in Thai patients undergoing hemodialysis carry a three-fold risk of pulmonary hypertension than peritoneal dialysis patients. Keywords: Pulmonary hypertension; Hemodialysis; Peritoneal dialysis
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
终末期肾脏疾病腹膜透析与血液透析患者肺动脉高压及危险因素的比较
背景:肺动脉高压(PAH)与终末期肾病患者的高死亡率和频繁并发症相关。这种疾病在泰国终末期肾病患者中的流行病学数据是有限的。目的:比较泰国终末期肾病患者血液透析和腹膜透析中PAH的患病率及危险因素。材料和方法:作者回顾性研究了2016年1月至2021年12月在Pranangklao医院就诊的终末期肾病患者。结果:共纳入201例患者。患者平均年龄55.57±16.22岁,男性占47.3%。大多数患者有高血压。大多数患者都服用了叶酸。血液透析组平均肺动脉压> 20mmhg的患者为81例(77.1%),腹膜透析组为52例(54.2%)(p<0.001)。血液透析组PAH高于腹膜透析组(OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.56 ~ 5.24, p<0.001)。以下是与PAH相关的因素:冠状动脉疾病史(OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.29 ~ 5.94, p<0.009), β受体阻滞剂使用史(OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.15 ~ 3.79, p<0.015),辛普森法左心室射血分数(OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.92 ~ 0.98, p<0.001)。在多因素logistic回归中,与PAH(腹膜透析组)相关的变量是血液透析(校正OR 3.16, 95% CI 1.66 ~ 6.03, p<0.001)。结论:终末期肾病患者接受血液透析的肺动脉高压风险是腹膜透析患者的三倍。关键词:肺动脉高压;血液透析;腹膜透析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD) and Conventional Lumbar Discectomy for Herniated Nucleus Pulposus (HNP) Behavioral Risk Score for Predicting Well-Controlled HbA1c Level in Diabetes Type 2 Patients The Choice of Anesthesia after First Failed Spinal Block and Its Impact on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Cesarean Delivery: A Cross-Sectional Study Efficacy of Levetiracetam versus Phenytoin in Neonatal Seizure in Rural Area of Thailand Spontaneous Sternal Fracture in Multiple Myeloma: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1