The Impact of Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder on Restraint and Seclusion in Pre-Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatients

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2020-04-02 DOI:10.1080/19315864.2020.1750742
Elizabeth M. O'Donoghue, D. Pogge, Philip D. Harvey
{"title":"The Impact of Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder on Restraint and Seclusion in Pre-Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatients","authors":"Elizabeth M. O'Donoghue, D. Pogge, Philip D. Harvey","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2020.1750742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Introduction: Features of intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may hinder responsiveness to interventions typically used during psychiatric hospitalization to manage severely disruptive behavior, and could increase the likelihood of experiencing restraint and/or seclusion (R/S). This study investigated the occurrence of R/S in psychiatrically hospitalized children rated by their treatment team as having ID and/or ASD and those who were rated as having neither. Methods: Pre-adolescents (N = 777; M = 9.71; SD = 2.71; Range 5–12) consecutively admitted to an acute psychiatric hospital during a one-year period were assigned a consensus DSM-5 diagnosis of ID (n = 295), ASD (n = 48), Both (n = 77), or Neither (n = 361). R/S occurrences were recorded in terms of their frequency and duration. Results:52% of patients experienced at least one R/S while hospitalized. The modal number of R/S events for this sample was 0, and for children who experienced any R/S, the mode was 2. Comparisons (ID, ASD, Both, Neither) showed statistically significant differences (p <.001) in R/S events. Children rated as meeting diagnostic criteria for ID (68%; M = 13.9), or Both ID and ASD (78%; M = 18.2), had elevated rates of R/S events compared to cases with Neither diagnosis (35%; M = 7.3). ASD alone (50%; M = 10.0) was not associated with an increase in R/S compared to cases with Neither diagnosis. Data on the duration of these events completely paralleled the frequency results. Conclusion: Children who met DSM-5 criteria for ID had a greater risk of experiencing R/S during psychiatric hospitalization. To reduce the occurrence of R/S, interventions must be refined and staff specially trained to address the complexities of treating children with ID.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"1 1","pages":"86 - 109"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2020.1750742","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction: Features of intellectual disability (ID) and/or autism spectrum disorder (ASD) may hinder responsiveness to interventions typically used during psychiatric hospitalization to manage severely disruptive behavior, and could increase the likelihood of experiencing restraint and/or seclusion (R/S). This study investigated the occurrence of R/S in psychiatrically hospitalized children rated by their treatment team as having ID and/or ASD and those who were rated as having neither. Methods: Pre-adolescents (N = 777; M = 9.71; SD = 2.71; Range 5–12) consecutively admitted to an acute psychiatric hospital during a one-year period were assigned a consensus DSM-5 diagnosis of ID (n = 295), ASD (n = 48), Both (n = 77), or Neither (n = 361). R/S occurrences were recorded in terms of their frequency and duration. Results:52% of patients experienced at least one R/S while hospitalized. The modal number of R/S events for this sample was 0, and for children who experienced any R/S, the mode was 2. Comparisons (ID, ASD, Both, Neither) showed statistically significant differences (p <.001) in R/S events. Children rated as meeting diagnostic criteria for ID (68%; M = 13.9), or Both ID and ASD (78%; M = 18.2), had elevated rates of R/S events compared to cases with Neither diagnosis (35%; M = 7.3). ASD alone (50%; M = 10.0) was not associated with an increase in R/S compared to cases with Neither diagnosis. Data on the duration of these events completely paralleled the frequency results. Conclusion: Children who met DSM-5 criteria for ID had a greater risk of experiencing R/S during psychiatric hospitalization. To reduce the occurrence of R/S, interventions must be refined and staff specially trained to address the complexities of treating children with ID.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智力障碍和自闭症谱系障碍对青少年前精神科住院患者约束和隔离的影响
摘要简介:智力残疾(ID)和/或自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的特征可能会阻碍对精神科住院期间通常用于管理严重破坏性行为的干预措施的反应,并可能增加经历约束和/或隔离(R/S)的可能性。这项研究调查了被治疗小组评定为患有认知障碍和/或自闭症的精神科住院儿童以及被评定为两者都没有的儿童中R/S的发生情况。方法:学龄前青少年(N = 777;M = 9.71;Sd = 2.71;范围5-12)在一年内连续入住急性精神病院,被分配到一致的DSM-5诊断为ID (n = 295), ASD (n = 48),两者(n = 77)或两者都没有(n = 361)。根据其频率和持续时间记录了R/S的发生情况。结果:52%的患者在住院期间至少经历了一次R/S。该样本的R/S事件的模态数为0,对于经历任何R/S的儿童,其模态为2。比较(ID、ASD、Both、Neither) R/S事件差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。被评为符合ID诊断标准的儿童(68%;M = 13.9),或ID和ASD都有(78%;M = 18.2),与没有诊断的病例相比,R/S事件发生率升高(35%;M = 7.3)。单独ASD (50%;M = 10.0)与两种诊断都没有的病例相比,与R/S的增加无关。这些事件持续时间的数据与频率结果完全一致。结论:符合DSM-5标准的儿童在精神科住院期间出现R/S的风险较大。为了减少R/S的发生,必须改进干预措施,并对工作人员进行专门培训,以解决治疗ID儿童的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Suicidality and Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review Mental Functions in People with Mild Intellectual Disability to Borderline Intellectual Functioning Personal Growth Among Parents of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities and Psychopathology: The Role of Social Support and Attitudes Toward Service Use Clinical Opinion: Differences in Addressing Needs of Persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities for In-Person and Digital Psychotherapy Impact of Crisis Care on Psychiatric Admission in Adults with Intellectual Disability and Mental Illness And/Or Challenging Behavior: A Systematic Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1