towards pragmatic and functional unit of mind-and-brain in rEsponsE to danko gEorgiEv's "a linkagE of mind and brain: sir john EcclEs and modErn dualistic intEractionism"
{"title":"towards pragmatic and functional unit of mind-and-brain in rEsponsE to danko gEorgiEv's \"a linkagE of mind and brain: sir john EcclEs and modErn dualistic intEractionism\"","authors":"Rayito Rivera-Hernández, D. Stoyanov","doi":"10.14748/BMR.V22.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consciousness is an enigma, perhaps the greatest enigma of philosophy of science. It can be described as a multilevel phenomenon, where transition (from unconsciousness to consciousness) is not a compromise OFF/ON in neuronal activity, but involves a complex change in nerve function, which is mediated by the environment. For the analysis of consciousness, the Australian philosopher David J. Chalmers distinguishes the easy problem of the hard problem of consciousness. The easy problem to analyze issues such as discrimination between sensory stimuli, the integration of information to guide behavior, verbalization of internal states, the integration of sensory information with past experience, how to focus attention, and what distinguishes waking from sleep. On the other hand, the \"hard problem\" of consciousness is to explain how the physical brain gives rise to consciousness. This analysis deals with the latter. Biomedical Reviews 2011; 22: 85-89.","PeriodicalId":8906,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Reviews","volume":"20 1","pages":"85-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/BMR.V22.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Consciousness is an enigma, perhaps the greatest enigma of philosophy of science. It can be described as a multilevel phenomenon, where transition (from unconsciousness to consciousness) is not a compromise OFF/ON in neuronal activity, but involves a complex change in nerve function, which is mediated by the environment. For the analysis of consciousness, the Australian philosopher David J. Chalmers distinguishes the easy problem of the hard problem of consciousness. The easy problem to analyze issues such as discrimination between sensory stimuli, the integration of information to guide behavior, verbalization of internal states, the integration of sensory information with past experience, how to focus attention, and what distinguishes waking from sleep. On the other hand, the "hard problem" of consciousness is to explain how the physical brain gives rise to consciousness. This analysis deals with the latter. Biomedical Reviews 2011; 22: 85-89.
意识是一个谜,也许是科学哲学中最大的谜。它可以被描述为一个多层次的现象,其中转换(从无意识到意识)不是神经元活动的妥协关闭/打开,而是涉及神经功能的复杂变化,这是由环境介导的。对于意识的分析,澳大利亚哲学家大卫·查默斯(David J. Chalmers)将意识的简单问题与困难问题区分开来。容易分析的问题包括:感官刺激之间的区别,信息的整合以指导行为,内部状态的语言化,感官信息与过去经验的整合,如何集中注意力,以及清醒与睡眠的区别。另一方面,意识的“难题”是解释物理大脑如何产生意识。本文分析的是后者。生物医学评论2011;22日:85 - 89。