H. Dao, V. M. Dinh, Anh Nguyen, Quan T. Dang, Hue T. Nguyen, Muu T. Nguyen, Duc Minh Nguyen, Linh H. Duong, Anh Q. Nguyen, Anh T. M. Pham, T. Q. Le, Trang T. T. Hoang, T. T. Dao, P. M. Le, T. N. Nguyen, L. Nguyen, T. T. M. Tran, T. M. Tran, M. Nguyen
{"title":"Arsenic in the soil–rice system of the Mekong River delta","authors":"H. Dao, V. M. Dinh, Anh Nguyen, Quan T. Dang, Hue T. Nguyen, Muu T. Nguyen, Duc Minh Nguyen, Linh H. Duong, Anh Q. Nguyen, Anh T. M. Pham, T. Q. Le, Trang T. T. Hoang, T. T. Dao, P. M. Le, T. N. Nguyen, L. Nguyen, T. T. M. Tran, T. M. Tran, M. Nguyen","doi":"10.1080/10807039.2023.2192292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Arsenic (As) in rice has been known as a worldwide human health threat that results originally from the accumulation of As in soil in many rice cultivation regions. This study aims to evaluate As levels in the soil–rice system in the Mekong River delta (MRD) with special focuses on the geographical distribution and the relation to soil physio-chemical properties. It was found that soil As contents varied from 0.3 to 15.9 mg kg−1 ( = 7.22 ± 0.3 mg kg−1), whereas straw As content was about one order of magnitude lower ( = 0.92 ± 0.1 mg kg−1). The content of As in grain varied from “not detectable” to 1115 µg kg−1 ( = 73 ± 19 µg kg−1). Relatively similar geographical distribution patterns were observed for soil As and straw As, meanwhile grain As did not reveal a clear association with straw As and soil As. The accumulation of As in rice (straw and grain) were likely affected by various factors, but the mutual effects of soil As pool and soil properties were the most obvious. The East coastal area of the MRD has been identified as a vulnerable area to As threat. This finding suggests that in addition to the action plans to preserve coastal paddy soils from the threats of sea level rise and salt intrusion, contamination of As should also be considered.","PeriodicalId":13141,"journal":{"name":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"801 - 816"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2023.2192292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Arsenic (As) in rice has been known as a worldwide human health threat that results originally from the accumulation of As in soil in many rice cultivation regions. This study aims to evaluate As levels in the soil–rice system in the Mekong River delta (MRD) with special focuses on the geographical distribution and the relation to soil physio-chemical properties. It was found that soil As contents varied from 0.3 to 15.9 mg kg−1 ( = 7.22 ± 0.3 mg kg−1), whereas straw As content was about one order of magnitude lower ( = 0.92 ± 0.1 mg kg−1). The content of As in grain varied from “not detectable” to 1115 µg kg−1 ( = 73 ± 19 µg kg−1). Relatively similar geographical distribution patterns were observed for soil As and straw As, meanwhile grain As did not reveal a clear association with straw As and soil As. The accumulation of As in rice (straw and grain) were likely affected by various factors, but the mutual effects of soil As pool and soil properties were the most obvious. The East coastal area of the MRD has been identified as a vulnerable area to As threat. This finding suggests that in addition to the action plans to preserve coastal paddy soils from the threats of sea level rise and salt intrusion, contamination of As should also be considered.
摘要水稻中的砷(As)已被认为是一个全球性的人类健康威胁,其主要原因是砷在许多水稻种植区的土壤中积累。本研究旨在评价湄公河三角洲土壤-水稻系统中砷含量,重点研究其地理分布及其与土壤理化性质的关系。土壤As含量变化范围为0.3 ~ 15.9 mg kg - 1(= 7.22±0.3 mg kg - 1),而秸秆As含量低约1个数量级(= 0.92±0.1 mg kg - 1)。砷在籽粒中的含量从“不可检测”到1115µg kg - 1(= 73±19µg kg - 1)。土壤砷和秸秆砷的地理分布格局较为相似,而籽粒砷与秸秆砷和土壤砷的相关性不明显。水稻(秸秆和籽粒)中砷的积累可能受到多种因素的影响,但土壤砷库与土壤性质的相互影响最为明显。MRD的东部沿海地区已被确定为易受威胁的地区。这一发现表明,除了保护沿海水稻土免受海平面上升和盐入侵威胁的行动计划外,还应考虑砷的污染。